Compare and Contrast the Characteristics of External, Internal, and Construct Validity
Validity is an important aspect of the research design. For instance, in research the uses statistics as the primary form of measurement. Validity applies to the truth of a standard. A measure is valid, in general, when it (Renata, 2011, 1) includes what it devised to measure. Renata (2011) explained, "Internal and external validity are the two primary types of validity" (para. 1). However, both display diverse aspects of a study’s design and results.
In order to distinguish internal and external validity, it is essential to understand what the term validity itself means with respect to research design. Validity applies to the truth or likely truth of a deductive debate. Alexander (2007) goes on to describe, “An argument is a set of statements implying true or false facts and a conclusion that derives from the statements” (para. 1). Support can be supplied to a set of circumstances that head to a conclusion or verdict, which is how the constitutional system operations. Alexander (227) asserts "Either the evidence supports the conclusion, or it does not, hence giving it validity or not" (para. 1). For example, all men are mortal, or James is a man. True arguments considered deductive. Arguments that probably are true said to be inductive. Alexander (2007) revealed, “Even when arguments seem to be valid, the question of logic should be introduced as added insurance that an argument is solid” (para. 2). A dispute is deductively legitimate when it has all true premises and conclusion. In instances where the premises are accurate, but the completion is wrong, the dispute shifts to indefensible.
Overall, there are many various types of validity, altho...
... middle of paper ...
...feScript.com
Leed, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2010). Practical Research: Planning and Design (9 ed.). New Jersey, New York , United States of America: Merrill.
MacKenzie, S. (2003). The dangers of poor construct conceptualization. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31, 323-326. doi:10.1177/0092070303031003011
McCroskey, J. R. (2006). An introduction to communication in the class:The role of communication in teaching and training . Boston: Allyn and Bacon .
Renata, R. (2011, Spetember 11). eHow: What is the Difference Between Internal and External Validity of Researcg Study Design? Retrieved December 10, 2013 , from What is the Difference Between Internal and External Validity of Researcg Study Design?: http://www.eHow.com
White, D. a. (1965). Construction of confounding plans for mixed factorial design . The Annals of Mathematical Statistics , 36, 1256-1271.
There are two basic psychometric properties, validity and reliability that have been used to evaluate the quality of scale development. Psychometric testing used to evaluate the quality of instrument (Polit& Beck, 2010).
Quasi-experimental designs are experimental designs that do not provide for the full control of extraneous variables. Primarily, the absence of control in this design is due to the lack of random assignment to groups. Quasi-experimental research designs are used in the study of cause and effect by manipulating the independent variable.
Validity is when the method used measures what it is suppose to measure. Validity is a true picture of what is being studied. Validity is important because it helps the data results achieve accuracy (Cherry, 2015). To ensure and achieve validity researchers should make sure the data collected is evidence of what it claims to be, and not just data which is not accurate or random (Classroom notes, 2015). Unstructured interviews are much more likely to be valid because the interviewer can explain the question to the participant, therefore the participant is not left to interpret the question if they do not understand.
The sampling procedures that can be utilized in evaluation research is vast. The selected sampling procedure is important in the consideration of external validity. External validity generalizes the findings to individuals in the study sample with characteristics that are alike (DiClemente et al., 2013). Although, not all research studies will require a sampling procedure that would deliver an external validity.
Validity is essentially the degree to which a conception is founded and parallels accurately to the real world. Validity is the tool that measures what the particular research was anticipated to measure (Schmitt & Brown, 2012). There are several different types of validity but the ones that will be discussed in this paper are concurrent and predictive. Concurrent validity is taking an already validated point and testing it with another measurement tool. This means that there was already a hypothesis proven right or wrong and now the researcher will be testing this same hypothesis but will being using another type of tool to see if the result...
In the criminal justice system it is imperative to understand why crime occurs in order to prevent them from happening. Researchers look for the cause of crime and experimental research is considered the best when determining cause and effect relationships. However, causality can never actually be proven only be hypothesized to a certain degree. Experimental research is used a top standard for the evaluation of other research methods as they are able to control the validity of the research both internal and external. Internal validity is the accuracy within the study itself while external validity is the ability to say the outcome is applicable to other groups. There are three main types of experimental research designs classical
The father of quantitative analysis, Rene Descartes, thought that in order to know and understand something, you have to measure it (Kover, 2008). Quantitative research has two main types of sampling used, probabilistic and purposive. Probabilistic sampling is when there is equal chance of anyone within the studied population to be included. Purposive sampling is used when some benchmarks are used to replace the discrepancy among errors. The primary collection of data is from tests or standardized questionnaires, structured interviews, and closed-ended observational protocols. The secondary means for data collection includes official documents. In this study, the data is analyzed to test one or more expressed hypotheses. Descriptive and inferential analyses are the two types of data analysis used and advance from descriptive to inferential. The next step in the process is data interpretation, and the goal is to give meaning to the results in regards to the hypothesis the theory was derived from. Data interpretation techniques used are generalization, theory-driven, and interpretation of theory (Gelo, Braakmann, Benetka, 2008). The discussion should bring together findings and put them into context of the framework, guiding the study (Black, Gray, Airasain, Hector, Hopkins, Nenty, Ouyang, n.d.). The discussion should include an interpretation of the results; descriptions of themes, trends, and relationships; meanings of the results, and the limitations of the study. In the conclusion, one wants to end the study by providing a synopsis and final comments. It should include a summary of findings, recommendations, and future research (Black, Gray, Airasain, Hector, Hopkins, Nenty, Ouyang, n.d.). Deductive reasoning is used in studies...
Validity scales are also found in a study by Caldwell- Andrews, Baer, and Berry. Validity scores measured in self- reports can be more bias than those of a correlation between observer and self- reports.
Likewise, in order to validate construct validity, Malhotra et al. (2012) recommends that in conducting research, researchers should use multi versus single-item scales to validate data from experiments, depending upon the complexity of the experiment. Malhotra et al. (2012) also recommends using a step-by-step approach ...
Cooper, P. Simonds, C (1999). Communication for the Classroom Teacher. 6th ed. Needham: Allyn & Bacon. p1-2.
The four different methods of measuring validity are content validity, evidence of validity from contrasting groups, evidence of validity from convergence, and evidence of validity from convergence (Grove et al., 2015, p. 289). Content validity is a measurement of how all the elements of a test are relevant and represent the phenomenon being measured. Evidence of validity from contrasting groups examines how well an instrument correlates in the opposite direction in already established groups (Westen & Rosenthal, 2003). Evidence of validity from convergence measures how the results from a relatively new tool compares in a positive relation to the results from an established tool. Lastly, evidence of validity from divergence measures how the results of a relatively new tool compare in a negative relation to the results of an established tool that measures an opposite phenomenon (Grove et al., 2015, p. 291). Validity of an instrument is paramount in determining how the research relates to the concept that is under
The irony is that speaking to others is one of the most important, if not the most important, professional and personal skill students must have to be successful (Doyle 88). The student needs to understand the importance of this skill and realize that in the future many opportunities and career successes are directly impacted by working with others. Students are also encouraged to take charge of their learning. Giving the student control and as many choices is a good way to optimized their learning.
Yan, J. & Plainiotis, S. (2006): Design for Sustainability. Beijing, China: Architecture and Building Press.
Another concern that some students might have is communication. Some students might not need to have a teacher in front of them and teach the course material to them, to whereas some students might need the te...
The beginnings of today's green revolution can be traced back to the environmental awareness of the 1960s and European design. New construction techniques have lead to the development of innovative materials and design concepts. Green buildings are designed, constructed and commissioned to ensure they are healthy for their occupants. Successfully designed green projects can involve an extensive array of factors, ranging from the resourceful use of materials, to careful consideration of function, climate, and location.