Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The strengths of administrative theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The strengths of administrative theory
Another example of classical theory is administrative principles. Even though scientific management and administrative theories fall under the same category, both of them are very different. Administrative theory is identified to have five general rules used in today’s modern society such as foresight, organisational, command, coordinate and control (Schermerhorn et al. 2014). Mary Parker Follet is well known for her contribution she made towards administrative approach her ideas included things like freedom of speech living in a diverse community, equality for all workers, resolve conflict situations and no dominated authority required (Schermerhorn et al. 2014). Dynamic Administration is an enhanced version of the principles used by modern managers where Mary illustrates the power and ability gained when …show more content…
Whereas, comparing it to scientific management the theory it would not help attract customers. Although administrative principle is a very objective it is still considered to be useful to the modern managers to work in a modern society. It is absolutely critical to take into consideration that administration highly depends on the individual person. For instant, young person can complete a task quicker than someone who has aged. Modern manager’s focus on more aspects and functions that are crucial for the company as it helps keep the customers and workers closer together. This reinforces the same idea that administrative is useful to modern managers but it’s subjective and varies.
One of the other approaches that are proved to be useful for modern management is the contingency approach. This applies to all the management conditions in a diverse environment. This approach normally does not have one particular system to help manage the
The classical approach to management was the result of an effort to develop a body of management thinking, and the management theorists who participated in this effort are considered the pioneers of management study. The classical viewpoint emphasises efficiency in managing work and organisations in order to increase production (S. C. Certo & S. T. Certo, 2006).... ... middle of paper ... ...
In this theory leadership style changes as needed to ensure that the goal is achieved (Huber, 2014). Each situation may need to be addressed differently, which requires flexibility by all involved, especially leadership. Managers need to evaluate every individual to understand what they are capable of and how they fit the needs of the institution and or situation (Nash, 2015). As a nurse I think this is a very important trait for a leader to have because of how quickly things change and how we must work within our environment. For example, in healthcare we sometimes have to allow others to take control of a situation on to ensure the best possible outcome for each patient. In addition, the manager needs to ensure that each person works within the scope of their practice, functions at the highest level allowed and completes their tasks. To be a successful leader in healthcare and achieve desired outcomes requires a high level of flexibility by leadership. I would also say that the contingency theory would also fit into my leadership style. The basis premise of this theory is that each situation is different and leadership needs to take that into account when managing a situation (Huber, 2014). At times a leader needs to look at the bigger picture and incorporate that in their decision making process. When looking at a specific situation taking input from all parties involved can lead to a more effective solution. We can learn a lot form those around us and need to take that in account to be an effective
By the constantly changing dynamics of the 21st century business world, it is clear that it would be highly unproductive for managers to employ what is in actual fact a restrictive, controlling theory of management. As a results of globalisation of the economy, intensification of international competition, pervasive influence of the social market economy, increasing participation of women in the labour force and ecological consciousness, scientific management is no longer suitable in modern workplaces, as this theory tends not to allow for the constant innovation that is necessary to maintain a competitive advantage in the marketplace.
Today’s era of business world adapts to everything new but these modern concepts are an indirect tribute to the theories produced by Taylor, Fayol, Mayo and Weber. Taylor’s Scientific management theory is one such example which has become such an important aspects of modern management that it feels unbelievable that his concepts were a part of the history. It is falsely assumed that as the society progresses, the older theories tend to lose their importance. The thing to be noted here is that these theories are based on basic human needs which do not change with time; the thing that changes is the method to fulfil those needs. Investigating earlier management theories is important because these theories are less complex and provide immediate solution to the problems. These theories basically help us to go to the root of the problem and understand its complexity. The better understanding we have about the problem, the easier it is to accomplish the objectives of the company. The following essay states the importance of the Taylor’s Scientific management theory and how it is implemented even today in the business world.
Scientific management was proposed by Frederick Taylor who believed that worker “could be retooled like machines, their physical and mental gears calibrated for better productivity.” In others words if a company develop a standard method for performing each job, train workers on those methods, and plan their work for them then production would be more efficient and effective. This perspective explains why McDonald 's employees are like robots. Everything is timed from start to finish in order to provide faster service. Max Weber 's hierarchical structure or bureaucratic organizations approach can be seen in McDonald 's structure. This perspective states that advancement in the company is not based on who you know but on what you know. There are certain positions established that people usually have to work from the bottom in order to prove that they have to the skills in order to move to a higher position. The administrative principles by Henri Fayol focuses on Unity of work, division of work, Unity of direction, and scalar chain. This perspective also apply to McDonald 's because usually there is only one manager on duty for the day. Since McDonald 's has implemented all three principles into the organization has this led to the success of the company. If not , then
It is some benefits to the conventional theory which are the average man is by nature indolent, he lacks ambitions, he is by nature resistant to change. It is also two different approaches to management is hard
Over the past hundred years management has continuously been evolving. There have been a wide range of approaches in how to deal with management or better yet how to improve management functions in our ever changing environment. From as early as 1100 B.C managers have been struggling with the same issues and problems that manager’s face today. Modern managers use many of the practices, principles, and techniques developed from earlier concepts and experiences.
There are several theories that examine an organization and it’s approach to managing work in an effort to develop efficiency and increase production. Two classical approaches to management are Taylor’s scientific management theory and Weber's bureaucratic management theory. Both men are considered pioneers of in the study of management.
The classical school of organization theory dominated administrations from the early 1900’s well into the 1930’s, and it is still relevant today in many of the contemporary organization theories. Shafritz states that classical organization theory was the first theory of its kind, and serves as the foundation of other schools organization theory (Shafritz, Ott, & Jang, 2011, p. 32). Classical organization theory includes scientific management approach, bureaucratic approach, and administrative management approach. Several major theorists of classical organization were Adam Smith, Frederick Taylor, Max Weber, Henri Fayol, and Luther Gulick.
Managing a workplace can be an eventful, yet stressful occupation, as motivating others while handling conflict can be challenging. In order to achieve success, the manager can explore many theories to help effectively manage the working environment. The implement of management theories help increase quality of service as well as increase the level of productivity within an organization (Hawthorne). “Not many managers use a singular theory or concept when implementing strategies in the workplace: They commonly use a combination of a number of theories, depending on the workplace, purpose and workforce” (Hawthorne). Contingency theory and Theory X and Theory Y are two of the many options that a manager can explore and adopt in order to effectively
This paper, will discuss scholarly views on the nature and types of theory; compare and contrast some views of what constitutes a theory, differentiate theory from related concepts, such as hypothesis, paradigm, model, and concept. The paper also, will review scholarly literature on the relationship between theory and research and the ways research (quantitative and qualitative) can contribute to theory. Moreover, the paper will discuss various ways research can contribute to theory; and try to explain how the theory adds or may add to our understanding of management field. Finally, this paper will discuss and analyze literatures on two areas of controversy or unanswered questions related to the theory.
There are three well-established theories of classical management: Taylor?s Theory of Scientific Management, Fayol?s Administrative Theory, Weber?s Theory of Bureaucracy. Although these schools, or theories, developed historical sequence, later ideas have not replaced earlier ones. Instead, each new school has tended to complement or coexist with previous ones.
A new element has been introduced by the contingency approach, which takes into consideration the impact of the organizational or work group on the extent to which given leader traits and behaviors will be effective. The approach was used mainly in the late 1960s and 1970s. Fiedler 's contingency theory, path-goal theory, the Vroom-Yetton-Jago decision-making model of leadership and the situational leadership theory are the most popular contingency
Other than that, modern management view too criticise that Functional Theory is only effective during the time of stable and predictable environment. In today’s chaotic environment, managers have to consider democracy as one of the management element. Managers have to be more careful on human behaviour and when necessary provides motivations and persuasion in order to get the work
In general, organizations to some degree of use administrative office management skills to motivate and help their employees with all necessary tools they have available to increase and attain higher business productivity as a whole (Gary P. Latham.) For example, through administrative office assistance services employees are considered the go-to people because of the various managerial activities from organizing meetings, planning events and creating presentations sometimes. Nowadays, administrative office assistants need to go through a continuous employee development; which begins with employee orientation and continues to with the training, counseling, appraising, and motivating employees (Velva