"That government is best which governs least." Or is it? Should the American people be free to rebel against laws they consider unjust? Henry David Thoreau addresses these issues in his essay, Civil Disobedience. Thoreau wholeheartedly accepts the declaration that the government is best which governs least, and would like to see it acted upon. One day, he hopes, we will be able to carry it out to the point where men can have a government that does not govern at all. Government "never of itself furthered any enterprise". He claims that the character of the American people, rather than the government, has kept the country free, settled the west and educated the people. If the government had not interfered, the people would have accomplished even more. Thoreau goes on to claim that we should not decide what is 'right' by majority, but rather by individual conscience. If an individual believes a law to be unjust, he should not obey the law. Thoreau had some good, high-sounding ideas, but it appears he did not understand the reasoning behind some of what the government does. His views do not match up to the views found in the Constitution and the Bible.
Thoreau claims that we should not decide right by majority, but by conscience. The majority are not necessarily right; they are only in power because they are the strongest group of people. Any government in which the majority rules in all cases cannot be based on justice. Thoreau asks why there cannot be "a government in which majorities do not virtually decide right and wrong, but conscience? ... Must the citizen... resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has every man a conscience, then? I think that we should be men first, and subjects afterwards." One should cultivate a res...
... middle of paper ...
... what is right and wrong morally will have complete power, which can easily lead to a tyrannical ruler.
Thoreau says we should not obey unjust laws - yet, if everyone did this, people would begin to call 'unjust' laws that they did not particularly like or that were hard to follow. In addition, this exhortation is completely against Biblical teaching. We are to obey governing authorities unless their laws go against God's law. Minorities can influence the government, but not in the way that Thoreau advises. We should instead be an influence as Peter counsels us to be an influence,
"For it is God’s will that by doing good you should silence the ignorant talk of foolish men. Live as free men, but do not use your freedom as a cover-up for evil; live as servants of God. Show proper respect to everyone: Love the brotherhood of believers, fear God, honor the king."
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- ... It does not settle the West. It does not educate (para. 2). His use of a simple sentence structure for this part was a good strategy because majority of his essay contains complex structure and has deep words; this part somehow provided a contrast to really stress his point. For the proceeding paragraphs, Thoreau talked about how a majority always tends to rule even when it does not portray morally-accepted behaviors nor recognize conscience. He justified this by arguing that majority rules not because they are right but because they are physically the strongest (para.... [tags: Henry David Thoreau, Civil disobedience]
1224 words (3.5 pages)
- Henry David Thoreau was born in a time where the government is not progressing, because they do not respect the rights of all individuals. In "Civil Disobedience," Thoreau shows his readers how useless the government was at the time. In government where they demand obedience from its people, even allowing some individuals to enslave each other. Men that work for the State are unable to practice their moral beliefs in human law, because State laws prevent from doing what is right. Although, Thoreau does believe that one individual can effect a major social change.... [tags: Henry David Thoreau, Civil disobedience]
908 words (2.6 pages)
- ... King knew his audience extremely well; they were all pastors, just like him, so he knew that biblical allusions would work. One example is when King responds to being called an extremist by using the terms “Was not Jesus an extremist for love… was not Amos an extremist for justice… was not Paul an extremist for the Christian Gospel…” (269; par. 31). Not only did these allusions work because they were well understood, but also because King’s references attempted to resonate with the morals of the pastors.... [tags: Civil disobedience, Henry David Thoreau]
1261 words (3.6 pages)
- “Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau was a means of educating people on why they should not settle for a less than perfect government. Thoreau’s work is a reminder that it is our duty to throw off an unsatisfactory government, as stated by Thomas Jefferson in the “Declaration of Independence.” Civil Disobedience touches on the subject of why people choose to do nothing about a government they are unhappy with. People fear the consequences they might suffer if they do interfere with the current government.... [tags: Civil Disobedience Essays]
1167 words (3.3 pages)
- "That government is best which governs least." Or is it. Should the American people be free to rebel against laws they consider unjust. Henry David Thoreau addresses these issues in his essay, Civil Disobedience. Thoreau wholeheartedly accepts the declaration that the government is best which governs least, and would like to see it acted upon. One day, he hopes, we will be able to carry it out to the point where men can have a government that does not govern at all. Government "never of itself furthered any enterprise".... [tags: Henry David Thoreau, Constitution]
1158 words (3.3 pages)
- ... Gandhi’s self-denial and simple lifestyle allowed him to relate to the people who later joined him in defying the government. In response to the British Salt Monopoly and Salt Law in India, Gandhi organized the Salt March, a plan to illegally make salt from the ocean (“Dandi”). It was an entirely nonviolent movement that Gandhi felt was just because as Thoreau had said “oppression and robbery [was] organized (268).” Salt was essential to the Indian people, but they could not afford it, therefore Gandhi reasoned that the injustice had corrupted the system, and he had no choice but to break the law (“Dandi”; Thoreau 273).... [tags: Nonviolence, Civil disobedience]
1424 words (4.1 pages)
- ... Thoreau states “...a mere shadow and reminiscence of humanity, a man laid out alive and standing, and already, as one may say, buried under arms with funeral accompaniments, though it may be.” Insinuating to the death of soldiers, Thoreau connects this allusion to his protest to the war, affirming that one who participates in the war may as well already have their funeral arranged. This talk of death persuades the audience further into the necessity of civil disobedience, as well as stress the urgency in the timing of it.... [tags: Civil disobedience, Henry David Thoreau, Protest]
1646 words (4.7 pages)
- ... Moreover, Thoreau claims that the American government listens to the desires of the majority, not the most informed and virtuous, therefore, the government houses an inability to determine the indicators of justice. Using warfare and politics as examples, Thoreau further claims that the government trains dog-like soldiers and politicians focused on upholding the law when they should be upholding the morals of humanity. Indeed, enslaving one-sixth of Mexico’s population – and accepting the government as one which governs slaves – should be enough to establish a civil duty for Americans to rebel against such atrocities.... [tags: United States, United States Constitution]
904 words (2.6 pages)
- Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau Thoreau's essay entitled "Civil Disobedience" i was an excellent way of educating the public on why people should not settle for a less than perfect government. His belief in demanding a better government was a great reminder that Thomas Jefferson insisted that it was our "duty, to throw off"(2) an unsatisfactory government in the "Declaration of Independence" ii Thoreau's essay also explained why people choose not to do anything about it. Thoreau stated that people "cannot spare the protection of the existing government, and they dread the consequences to their property and families of disobedience to it" (25).... [tags: Civil Disobedience Essays]
2052 words (5.9 pages)
- In Thoreau’s essay “Resistance to Civil Government”, Henry David Thoreau outlines a utopian society in which each individual would be responsible for governing himself. His opposition to a centralized government is an effort to disassociate with the American government, which at the time was supporting slavery and unjustly invading Mexico. While the individual rule would work well for Thoreau who is a man of conscience, it does not account for the immoral, dishonest or overly ambitious people in the nation.... [tags: Civil Disobedience Essays]
396 words (1.1 pages)