Analysis Of The Treatment Of Caliban In Shakespeare's The Tempest

1939 Words4 Pages

The idea of “monster” is an enduring one that has remained a constant in popular culture through successive generations. There are many different interpretations and definitions of what traits separate man from monster, these traits generally include a large, ugly, and frightening physical appearance, and/or being inhumanly cruel or wicked. In fictional texts that discuss monsters, these traits usually come together in one character, an example being Caliban from Shakespeare’s The Tempest. However, other texts, such as Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, portray characters who arguably show only one of these monstrous traits, which in turn calls to question what truly makes monsters of men. Beings who humans perceive to be monsters, when examined, …show more content…

This means that from a modern perspective, Prospero’s treatment of Caliban makes him a monster, due to the cruelty of his actions. The human want of justice, however, can justify the poor treatment of Caliban by Prospero, given that his status as slave is a punishment for the attempted rape of Prospero’s daughter. In this way, Prospero is not a monster, only a man seeking justice for a perceived wrong. Stephano and Trinculo are ignorant to the evils that make Caliban a monster independent of his appearance, making their actions towards Caliban inexcusable. Upon seeing Caliban, Trinculo states, “Were I in England now… and had but [Caliban] painted, not a holiday-fool there but would give a piece of silver.” (Act 2, Scene 2). Trinculo jests about the worth of Caliban, as if he were no more than a strange creature to take and sell. Stephano is no different in his first appraisal of Caliban, “If I can recover him, and keep him tame, and get to Naples with him, he’s a present for any emperor…” (Act 2, Scene 2). Stephano, like Trinculo, plans to take Caliban away from his native Isle and sell him for a profit. This assessment of his worth comes from little more than a first glance at his person, selling a person for material gain is an act of evil, and considering it as seriously as both Trinculo and Stephano did, makes them not so much men as monsters. This assessment, however, is a product of modern perspective, and it puts into question the intentions of Shakespeare as to the portrayal of these three characters. In an earlier Shakespearean text, Macbeth, the character that exemplifies man, Macduff, says to Macbeth, “We’ll have thee, as our rarer monsters are, painted on a pole, and underwrit, ‘Here may you see the tyrant.’” (Act 5, Scene 8) This shows that the displaying of monsters as exhibits is not rare, and nor is it frowned upon by the general public. This would mean that perspectives of

Open Document