On the topic of terrorism, Canada is not impervious to the issue of terrorism. Not only are there international terrorists in Canada but there are domestic terrorists. These terrorists are active in terrorist activities within the borders of Canada and they support terrorism in other countries (“Building Resilience Against Terrorism: Canada’s Counter-terrorism Strategy”). Terrorism has been a concern for a while. Canada is not only concerned with the domestic threats against them, but they are also concerned with the attacks on the United States, Madrid, London, Bali, and Amsterdam (“Permanent Mission of Canada to the United Nations”).
Furthermore, Canada has taken a counter-terrorism position. Canada has created a Counter-Terrorism Capacity Building (CTCB) Program. This allows Canada to help other states to prevent terrorism and respond to terrorist activity according to international counter-terrorism (“Counter-Terrorism Capacity Building Assistance”). Canada provides this Program to share its expertise to other countries in areas such as anti-terrorism funding, border securi...
... middle of paper ...
...d the contributions of the Canadian government. Canada is not only distressed by domestic terrorism, but it is concerned with international terrorism. By creating a strategy to deal with terrorism, Canada is taking many steps to end terrorism. Also, through international collaborations and conventions, Canada has faith that the UN and its members will be able to end terrorism.
"Building Resilience Against Terrorism: Canada’s Counter-terrorism Strategy." Government of Canada, Public Safety Canada. Government of Canada, 19 Aug. 2013. Web. 09 Nov. 2013.
"Counter-Terrorism Capacity Building Assistance." Counter-Terrorism Capacity Building Assistance. Government of Canada, 26 Apr. 2013. Web. 09 Nov. 2013.
"Permanent Mission of Canada to the United Nations." Fighting International Terrorism and Crime. Government of Canada, 07 Aug. 2012. Web. 09 Nov. 2013.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- By defining terrorism, we can begin to look at what terrorism really is about. It is not just coercion, but it’s also revenge. It is the deliberate act of killing innocent people in order to achieve a terrorist’s political and religious goals. To justify terrorism equals justifying the innocent slaughter. Terrorism challenges the natural need for humans to see their world as predictable, orderly, and controllable. The violence of terrorism in its many forms is abhorrent to all that believe human life is a gift of god and therefore infinitely precious.... [tags: Terrorism, Violence, Definition of terrorism]
909 words (2.6 pages)
- In liberal democracies, most political acts are indeed legal, yet some instead decide on another way of influencing political decisions. Terrorism, is a seemly violent method intravenously employed by marginal groups to gain the focus of others on their case. Dyck defines terrorism as “the threat or use of violence, usually directed at civilian populations, in order to create some form of political change” (Dyck 401). The acts of terrorism that took place in the United States on September 11, 2001 are a powerful mementoes of how some choose to engage in violence in order to make a political statement.... [tags: Terrorism ]
1808 words (5.2 pages)
- War on Drugs = War on Terrorism??. The United States’ new claim in today’s world of propaganda and mind-warping media is that The War on Terrorism = The War on Drugs. Recently simple anti-drug slogans have been manipulated into aggressively and often erroneously exaggerated media assaults. (planetpapers.com) The United States claims that each person can help fight terrorism by choosing not to buy or use illicit drugs, and the government itself can help fight terrorism by implementing a more effective War on Drugs throughout the country.... [tags: Essays Papers]
2462 words (7 pages)
- Where is the Glory of War. I cannot find the glory in the war against terrorism. I remember when I picked up the newspaper last year and saw "America Strikes Back!" blazed boastfully across it in letters 10 inches tall--my heart sank. We've answered one terrorist act with another, raining death on the most war-scarred, terrified populace that ever crept to a doorway and looked out. The small plastic boxes of food we also dropped are a travesty. It is reported that these are untouched, of course--Afghanis have spent their lives learning terror of anything hurled at them from the sky.... [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Topics]
1068 words (3.1 pages)
- Abstract: Globalization has had both negative and positive effects. While some cultures accept globalization as a wonderful gesture, others reject it with violent force. Since the main country involved in the notion of globalization is the United States, many countries, most of those who are adamantly opposed to globalization, call globalization "Americanization." For the Muslims who supported the terrorists in the 9-11 attack, they label America's treatment of them as reason for their hatred of the United States. They claim that the United States has forced them into a situation they want no part of, and hence, their actions were a statement of rebellion. Other countrie... [tags: Argumentative Persuasive Essays]
3056 words (8.7 pages)
- A large number of EU countries do not want to share gathered information by the intelligence services, which allows the terrorists to lead free strikes in the continent. According to US intelligence and CT officials (Rubin, 2016), Belgium’s and France’s counterterrorism agencies do not exchange and give to each other crucial information about the terrorists groups. Additionally, after the latest terrorist’s attacks in Paris and Brussels that happened in 2016, the American authorities enhanced the effort to share much more important information with its allies and to help to solve the problem of sharing information among European countries (Rubin, 2016).... [tags: Terrorism, Counter-terrorism, Irregular military]
1527 words (4.4 pages)
- Introduction Just ten years ago the United States publically condemned Israel’s use of targeted killings against Palestinian terrorists. Martin S. Indyk, the former American ambassador to Israel, said in a statement on 5 July 2001, '‘The United States government is very clearly on the record as against targeted assassinations…they are extrajudicial killings, and we do not support that.’' However, after September 11th, the US makes frequent use of the controversial tactic in the global war on terrorism.... [tags: Terrorism]
1487 words (4.2 pages)
- From the perspective of the West, the war on terror can seem to be as never-ending as battling Hydra. For every terrorist leader struck down, three more arise from the dust to take his place, and themselves take positions of power in numerous countries. It’s difficult for Western powers to understand that it is the cutting down of that one leader that gives rise to the others. In the wake of 9/11, the American approach to the war on Terror has poured oil on what was once a small fire of fundamentalist fervour.... [tags: global issues, terrorism]
872 words (2.5 pages)
- ... It may apply techniques such as developing terrorist literature in someone’s house and circulating it to a broader audience covertly (Reich, 1998). It may also involve use of websites that are password-protected and restricted to chant groups on the internet. This form of recruitment has been popular with Al Qaeda after 9/11 since the group as a means of recovering from the loss of proximate and private channels. Some policy experts claim that this form of terrorist group recruitment of Al Qaeda is virtual jihad, as the group uses websites with restricted chat groups and websites that are password protected (Chaliand & Arnaud, 2008).... [tags: the fight against terrorism, profiling]
2060 words (5.9 pages)
- Abandoning the Constitution in the Fight Against Terrorism During his terms as governor of Texas, George W. Bush made it clear that he was ignorant of the Constitution by denying due process to the people he executed and refusing effective counsel to indigent inmates. As president, Bush, terrorized by terrorists, is abandoning more and more of the fundamental rights and liberties that he-and his subordinates-assure us they are fighting to preserve. On Thursday, November 15, William Safire-The New York Times' constitutional conservative-distilled Bush's new raid on the Constitution: "Misadvised by a frustrated and panic-stricken attorney general, a president of the United States has... [tags: September 11 Terrorism Essays]
1656 words (4.7 pages)