Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should concealed carry be allowed
Gun control in the us and uk essay
Gun control in the us and uk essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Should concealed carry be allowed
Every individual has rights afforded to them, be it natural rights, inherent rights, or rights given by a person’s governing body. With great rights, come great individual responsibilities. Where do these individual rights and responsibilities begin, end, or overlap with the government’s? There are restrictions that accompany these right and responsibilities, and rightfully so. This is due to the fact that not every person is capable of fulfilling the responsibilities set forth to afford these rights. So, who then does this make responsible for individual and public safety? The second amendment acknowledges that every person has the right and responsibility to defend themselves, be it from a tyrannical government or from foreign, or domestic …show more content…
Undercover agents using fake names and identification went all over the U.S. to try to purchase guns with the fraudulent names and identification. They were successful, and this uncovered another issue with NICS. The system does not positively identify the individual. It only checks to see if the name matches one from a long list of deniable individuals. What is worse is some of the people that have been allowed to purchase not just firearms, but explosives. Individuals who are on the FBI’s terrorist watch list were allowed to purchase firearms and obtain explosives licenses with a 91 percent approval rate (Lawrence, …show more content…
is exponentially more violent than any other nation especially when it comes to firearm use. Then it is often compared to the number of guns per capita in the country. The problems with this myth is that although the United States does have the highest number of privately owned firearms in the world, but we only have 4.8 per 100,000 homicides while Honduras for instance has an almost outright ban on all personal firearms, their homicide rate is 91.6 per 100,000 (Homicide statistics, 2012). These are homicides with firearms in a country with some of the world’s strictest gun restrictions. It has actually been proven that in 2003 handgun ownership increased 30 percent in the U.S., and the trend that followed was a decrease in homicide rates by nearly 27 percent (Guns and crime, 2004). Great Britain is also a very common counter example of a less violent nation after they banned handguns in 1997. The fact is per 100,000 Britain has 2,034 violent incidents versus the U.S. at 466 per 100,000(Slack, 2009). That is actually worse than South Africa which is said to be one of the most dangerous countries in the world. Britain is actually the most violent nation in the EU. The violence has actually gotten to the point that a group of doctors have attempted to legislate for a ban on long pointed kitchen knives which are used in about half of all violent crimes in Britain (Edwards, 2009). Violent offenders do not need guns to do harm,
United States is a country that has problems with gun control, and this issue has many debates between whether or not people should be allowed to carry a gun on them. This free county not only for speech and religion, but also allows people to have the right to bear arms. The Second Amendment of the United States was written by our Founding Fathers,“A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Government). The main purpose of the Second Amendment when our Founding Fathers wrote this amendment was to help the American citizens to defend themselves from the government at that time, and other countries from invading their properties. However, the Second Amendment could be the opposite of what our Founding Fathers wanted it to be in the twenty-first century, because many criminals are taking advantage of the right to carry guns, which in example results with the purpose of showing off with their friends, revenge for their gang’s members, or try to be like their favorite hero in the movie they had watched. On July 20, 2012, a massive shooting occurred inside of a movie theater in Aurora, Colorado. The tragedy happened during a midnight screening of the film The Dark Knight Rises which killed twelve people and injuring seventy others. In response, this alarmed our government to rethink about the current gun control law in America. In A Well Regulated Militia by Saul Cornell, the author informed to his audience the different views of gun ownership in early America, which part was the most important part of the debate, how did slavery affect the debate over militias in the South, the Continental army officer’s views, and the arguments be...
The background check system can help to reduce crime and violence with the help of the NICS. This system is in charge or having criminal, mentally ill, or drug abusers names. Their names should appear on the database when they want to purchase a gun, and it has to be shared with the FBI. However since the Virginia Tech massacre they realized that the background check system is missing a lot of records and was not succeeding. Because of this congress passed the NICS Improvement Amendments Act to help with the cost of gathering and submitting information from agencies and states to the FBI, to create a more accurate database and make it faster for new information to be loaded in the NICS. According to Christine Watkins, “Every day 34 Americans are murdered with guns, and most of them are possessed illegally” (Watkins 1).
America probably has the highest rate of gun ownership in the world. In Canada, the percentage of Canadian households with a rifle is approximately equal to the level in United States. According to the statistics of gun murder rates around the world from ‘Bowling for columbine’, America has 11,127 gun accidents while Canada merely has 165. Is the number of gun ownerships a main factor behind a violent society? Indeed weapon does not commit crimes, the perpetrator does.
McMahan backs up his premises by showing that in other “Western Countries, per capita homicide rates, as well as rates of violent crime involving guns, are a fraction of what they are in the United States.” (McMahan, 4) After reading this statement, we are to assume that those countries have more gun regulations, and ultimately our limited gun regulations and access to firearms are what is driving so much violence within our country. Gun advocates deny this claim,
When the Second Constitutional Convention wrote the Constitution in 1787, there was a controversy between the federalists and the anti-federalists surrounding whether or not to have a Bill of Rights. The anti-federalists claimed that a bill of rights was needed that listed the guaranteed rights that the government could never take away from a person i.e. “inalienable rights.” A Bill of Rights was eventually deemed necessary, and has worked for over 210 years. There are many reasons why the ten amendments are still valid to this day, and the best examples are the First Amendment, concerning the freedom of religion, the Fifth Amendment, and the Sixth Amendment.
The Second Amendment is often misinterpreted because of the wording; people believe it only applies to the military or militia. The Second Amendment reads; “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” On June 26th, 2008, the Supreme Court established, in the case District of Columbia v. Heller, that citizens are the militia and the Second Amendment is an individual right. McDonald v. Chicago, set the precedent that the amendment covers every state and locality—not just federal enclaves (Levy 1). The Second Amendment has two clauses, the Operative Clause and the Prefatory Clause. The Operative Clause is the actual protected right and the Prefatory Clause is t...
High homicide rate can be directed link to present of guns in family household. America is known to have the highest gun possession rate in the world. Due to the Second Amendment, American have easy access to guns. Anyone can
“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” This quote from Benjamin Franklin illustrates how an emphasis on safety can drastically reduce the freedoms enjoyed by citizens of the United States, especially the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution which states that “...the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” However, with active shooter situations such as Columbine; the Tucson, Arizona shootings, which nearly killed former Representative Gabrielle Giffords; and recent situations at Newtown, Connecticut; Los Angeles International Airport; and Westfield Garden State Plaza mall in New Jersey, the federal government has questioned this right guaranteed to us as U.S. Citizens. In Congress, it is a back-and-forth battle between the Republicans, who favor less gun control legislation and a literal translation of the Second Amendment, and the Democrats who would like to see more gun control legislation to protect the safety of citizens. However, more gun control legislation would punish law-abiding citizens, be a direct violation of the Second Amendment, and expand the power of the federal government into areas where the Founding Fathers never wanted it.
Benjamin Franklin, one of the founding fathers of the United States, once said “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” In America’s society today, some are willing to sacrifice their civil liberties in order to gain protection and security over some potential threat. Especially after the events of September 11th and several attempted bombings in U.S. cities. This sacrifice of individual freedoms such as the freedom of speech, expression, the right to information, to new technologies, and so forth, for additional protection is more of a loss than a gain. Citizens of the United States deserve equal liberty and safety overall, as someone should not have to give up one value in order to gain another. This concept of individual right goes beyond the simple idea of “individual comfort.” Personal liberties cannot be surrendered and are not to be compromised since these liberties are intangible. Individuals should not have their personal liberties exchanged for national security because individuals are guaranteed protection to these rights.
Once faced with tougher restrictions because of police officers and individuals expanded background checks for the right to keep and bear arms, expect criminals to find the way to commit a crime. For instance, according to Andrew Gumbel, writer for The Guardian, the daily Washington newspaper, Timothy McVeigh, solo mastermind, found the way to commit a crime disregarding gun restriction. McVeigh, a decorated Army veteran of the Persian Gulf War abused one’s right to keep and bear arms when he bombed the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995 killing 168 people. McVeigh stole the material to make the bomb and robbed a gun collector in his home of $60,000 worth of guns. The gun control law did not stop McVeigh from acquiring guns, explosives and committing this evil act and will not stop other criminals from using illegal
Since 2003, which incidentally was about the time the British government flooded the country with 20,000 more cops, the homicide rate has fallen to 11.1 in 2010. In other words, the 15-year experiment in a handgun ban has achieved absolutely nothing”. The United Kingdom tried a 15 year ban on guns and all it did was increase the rate of crimes. From 1990 until the ban was put into effect, the homicide rate went from 10.9 to 13 per million. After the ban was there for a while, the homicides reached 18.0 in 2003.
Gun control is one of the biggest debates that America is currently facing today. The reason why this topic concerns many Americans is because of the crime that is related from it. FBI data shows approximately 70,975 homicides were committed in America from 2006 to 2010 from various different types of firearms (Wenzel, 2012). That 's 14,195 on average per year homicides from firearms. Only 9,075 came from knives and other sharp objects, which equate to about 1815 homicide a year. Firearms are the number one tool being used in America for homicides. But even bigger than this, suicide rates reached over 19,000 casualties in 2010 from firearms. Firearms have a 90 percent success rate compared to poison, which is only 30 percent (Center for Disease
In their article Gun Ownership as a Risk Factor For Homicide in The Home, Arthur Kellerman and his colleagues state that gun ownership increases the risk of violent crimes in the home instead of conferring protection. However, after reviewing their claims a number of flaws in their research and data collection methods are evident. There are a series of inappropriate conclusions and validity concerns throughout the article – having realized that these exist – it is impossible to sustain that gun ownership leads to higher homicide rates. Further research is needed to determine if a casual relationship is at all present and then to ascertain the true nature of the potential link.
Many countries around the world agree on two basic rights, the right to liberty and the right to ones own life. Outside of these most basic human and civil rights, what do we deserve, and do these rights apply to animals as well? Human rights worldwide need to be increased and an effort made to improve lives. We must also acknowledge that “just as one wants happiness and fears pain, just as one wants to live and not die, so do other creatures” (Dalai Lama). Animals are just as capable of suffering as we are, and an effort should be made to increase their rights. Governments around the world should establish special rights that ensure the advancement and end of suffering of all sentient creatures, both human and non-human. Everyone and everything should be given the same chance to flourish and live.
Whether we realize it or not, we all want freedoms. These freedoms, though, may not be sensible. Outrageous or inhumane even. Not all freedoms necessarily need to be allowed. Truthfully, there are people who suffer from the rights of others. Many of these wanted rights all come with consequences. So why should everyone be granted with what they want? Therefore, rights should be demanded and not given.