Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Animal Testing: a Cruel and Inhumane Way
Animal Testing: a Cruel and Inhumane Way
Harm of animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Animal Testing: a Cruel and Inhumane Way
Animal Experimentation Maddie Austin Animals today are not only loved as pets, or living freely in the wild, but being tortured to death in labs. Animal testing has caused humans to take away many animals freedom of life. Animal experimentation is the procedures, testing, and research done on living animals.(Human Society) This is done to see the results,effects, and outcomes a product. For example, experimentation effects of medicinal products or cosmetics. Companies do this to know if what they are testing is safe for humans. But, while doing so, they are killing, torturing, and hurting many animals. Animal experimentation is and has been a very controversial topic, but morally wrong.Animals have feelings, emotions, and ability to feel Some examples include lots of different types of animals used in animal testing such as mice, fish, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters and farm animals. Also, birds, cats, dogs, mini-pigs, and monkeys or chimps. Animals are tested on in many ways. “A few common procedures are forced chemical exposure in toxicity testing, which can include oral force-feeding, forced inhalation, skin or injection into the abdomen, muscle, etc. Exposure to drugs, chemicals or infectious disease at levels that cause illness, pain and distress, or death is another common procedure.” (Human Society). These procedures are not just wrong, but prove the cruelty of them. There are multiple types of testing strategies and surgeries tested on animals. Examples are prolonged periods of physical restraint, food and water deprivation, surgical procedures followed by recovery, infliction of wounds, burns and other injuries to study healing and infliction of pain to study its physiology and treatment. Lastly, there are Behavioural experiments designed to cause distress, e.g., electric shock or forced swimming, Other manipulations to create “animal models” of human diseases ranging from cancer to stroke to depression and killing by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck-breaking, decapitation, or other means. This proves the destruction and abuse animal testing "Animal Testing." The American Anti-Vivisection Society. The American Anti-Vivisection Society, n.d. Web. 23 Feb. 2016. . Finley, Laura, and Sally Driscoll. "Animal Experimentation: An Overview. ." InfOhio. 2016. N. pag. Points of View Reference Center. Web. 18 Feb. 2016. . Humane Education Network. "A Picture Is worth a Thousand Words." Humane Education Network. Humane Education Network, 2005. Web. 17 Feb. 2016. . Human Society. "About Animal Testing." Human Society International. Human Society International, 2016. Web. 8 Feb. 2016. . Murnaghan, Ian. "Background and History of Animal Testing." About animal testing. About animal testing, 2000. Web. 24 Feb. 2016. . Understanding Animal Research. "Why Animals Are Used in Research." Understanding Animal Research. Understanding Animal research, 2016. Web. 25 Feb. 2016. . Woods, Geraldine. Animal Experimentation. Berkeley Heights: Enslow, 1999. Print. Refer to the rubric on Google Classroom for an explanation of the following scores Purpose, Focus, and Organization Evidence and Elaboration Conventions of Standard English Total Score (out of 10)
“Frequently Asked Questions." The Truth About Vivisection. In Defense of Animals, n.d. Web. 26 Mar. 2014.
The information that animals have provided scientists over the past decades has changed society, and is still changing society for the better. Millions of lives have been saved with the use of animal testing and many more will be saved with continued research. However, there are many who dismiss this monumental achievement completely and oppose the use of animals in laboratory research. Though many find this practice to be
The practice of using animals for testing has been a controversial issue over the past thirty years. Animal testing is a morally debated practice. The question is whether animal testing is morally right or wrong. This paper will present both sides of this issue as well as my own opinion.
Animal testing is a subject appalled by many people. It is considered to be unethical, inhumane, and downright cruel. One of these reasons for the opposition of animal experimentation is due to the belief shared by many animal activist groups, such as PETA, that animals are kept in appalling living conditions in research facilities. Reasons to believe this are caused by minor instances of laboratories not abiding the law. However, despite these instances the welfare of test animals are preserved by many laws and regulatio...
They are forcibly given toxic substances and pain relief is never an option. Killing the animals at the end of the testing is common practice, since the animals are no longer useful. In one example, rabbits acted as test subjects to test the eye irritation of certain shampoos. The bunnies were restrained, their eyelids forced open with clips for days and the shampoos were applied. Some of the test subjects experienced redness, ulcers, and bleeding and even blindness.
Driscoll, Sally and Laura Finley. “Animal Experimentation: An Overview.”Points Of View: Animal Experimentation (2013): 1. Points of View Reference Center. Web. 6 Feb. 2014
"Animal Research Alternatives" The American Anti-Vivisection Society. N.p., 21 Jan. 2009. Web. 13 Jan. 2014.
A Student Guide to Balancing the Issues. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Animal Experimentation. Web. 1 May 2014.
Animal testing has been in practice since the early 300’s BCE, often used by ancient philosophers to advance the very little knowledge at the time in the field of biomedicine. Some of these philosophers who began animal testing are well known, such as Aristotle and Erasistratus. Another scientist named Ibn Zuhr came up with the idea of using animals to test surgical procedures on animals before beginning them on human patients (Hajar). Rachel Hajar, M.D., states that animal testing began to undergo criticism from animal welfare and protection groups because of the inhumane procedures inflicted on the animals. These groups had laws passed in many countries that gave the animals more protection when being researched upon. Scientists who support animal testing insist that it is necessary to expand our knowledge in the science and medicine world. Claude Bernard, a physiologist, says “Experiments on animals are entirely conclusive for the toxicology and hygiene of man. The effects of these substances are the same on man as on animals, save for differences in degree” (“Animal Testing and Medicine”). Because of the large amount of debate ...
In modern society, animal experimentation has triggered a controversy; consequently, vast amount of protests have been initiated by the animal rights community. Although these organizations have successfully broadcast their concerns toward animal experimentation, its application continues to survive. Sally Driscoll and Laura Finley inform that there remain fifty million to one-hundred million animals that experience testing or experimentation throughout the world on a yearly basis. But despite opposition, animal experimentation, the use of experiments on animals in order to observe the effects an unknown substance has on living creatures, serves multiple purposes. Those particular purposes are: research of the living body, the testing of products, and the advancement of medicine.
"Speak Out for Species (S.O.S) - Animals Used in Experiments and Testing." University of Georgia. Web. 14 Dec. 2009. .
The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'. Sun, Shany. A. The Truth Behind Animal Testing. Young Scientists Journal 5.12 (2012): 835.
Since experiments are cruel and expensive, “the world’s most forward-thinking scientists have moved on to develop and use methods for studying diseases and testing products that replace animals and are actually relevant to human health” (“Alternatives to Animals”). Companies claim that this sort of cruelty will benefit the human population by testing the “safety” of the products, as they have been for hundreds of years, and although this may have been helpful in the past, scientists have discovered otherwise. “While funding for animal experimentation and the number of animals tested on continues to increase, the United States still ranks 49th in the world in life expectancy and second worst in infant mortality in the developed world” (“Animal Testing Is”). This evidence shows that while we still continue to support and spend money on animal testing, it is not working as well as we thought.
For years animal testing has been a very controversial issue around the globe. Animal testing has been very beneficial to people, but has cause an up stir to animal rights activists and organizations like PETA. “The earliest references to animal ex...
Orlans, F. Barbara. In the Name of Science:Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation. New York: Oxford UP: Oxford UP, 1993.