Critical Analysis Of Easter, 1916

1337 Words3 Pages

The poem I have chosen to analysis and do a close reading on is Easter, 1916 by William Butler Yeats. The reason behind my choosing of this poem is due to my deep love of history. I think I chose this poem to look into because I am not very good at understanding poetry but I like the fact that I can understand what the poem is based off of and in return get more out of the poem and that William Yeats connects on a personal level with a piece of history. My close reading on this poem lead to making the argument that this poem lead to a change in the form of an occasional poem to a poem more about a part of his life by taking the historical event and making it personal and provide a deeper meaning for the writer while also providing a richer …show more content…

On the one hand, the Uprising is beautiful because it 'll go down in history as a great fight for Irish freedom. On the other hand, a whole bunch of people died that he knew and interacted with on a daily basis. The phrase "terrible beauty" seems to be Yeats 's way of saying that history 's most celebrated moments are usually moments of death. As author Terry Eagleton wrote in his article “History and Myth in Yeat’s ‘Easter 1916’, “Yeats poems…combines confidently affirmative statement with candid confession of painfully unresolved ambiguities” (Eagleton 248) showing that Yeats use of the line “A terrible Beauty” to try and comprehend this tragic event that has just taken place and how he was trying to figure out how something like this had happened right in front of …show more content…

Throughout this poem, Yeats tries to grapple with how he actually feels about the unsuccessful Easter Uprising of 1916. He wrote this poem in 1921, which means he had five years to decide how he felt. But even after half a decade, he still can 't come down hard on whether the uprising was a good or bad idea publicly. Yeats does describe the men involved in both positive and negative light but tends to have more positive then negative showing that he actually supported the cause or maybe just the people involved. Yeats says one of them had "ignorant good will" (18) and a "shrill" voice (20). Still, though, no matter how he feels about the cause he believes he has to say something about these people and the legacy they left behind. At the end of the day, the speaker can 't get behind what happened in the Easter Uprising. But he can say that the fighters deserve to be remembered in a poem and that they 'll be remembered "Whenever green is worn" (78). So in the end, he never overcomes his sense that he was right to stay out of the conflict. But he 's still willing to acknowledge that the fighters didn 't die for

Open Document