Gender Inequality In Togmarole

1802 Words4 Pages

In Morley Callaghan’s short story, Rigmarole and Bronwen Wallace’s For Puzzled in Wisconsin, gender guides the characters of each story toward unbalanced positions of power in their relationships, ultimately leading to an overwhelming feeling of isolation and disunity. This becomes evident through the constraints of gender norms, and their inability to effectively communicate their feelings with their partners.
Within many respects gender plays an overwhelming role in defining a person, and promotes a sense of confinement to the characters of both Rigmarole and Puzzled in Wisconsin. The character’s acceptance of these norms allow for an imbalance of power, and ultimately a feeling of isolation. In Callaghan’s short story, Rigmarole, both main
Anna, looks back on her past relationship with a man named Jeff, and juxtaposes that with her current husband, many years later: Peter. She reflects back on her youth when she was with Jeff, and the time that they spent with her friend Gwen and her boyfriend Chuck. The first instance of imposed gender norms is that of Anna’s memories of Gwen and Chuck’s interactions. “She always called him ‘honey’ or ‘hon’. He called her ‘babe’. I could imagine Jeff calling me anything” (Wallace, 315). The difference between Anna and Mathilde being that Anna, though she recognizes these gender norms and conforms, she does not want to adhere to them. Whenever confronted with a gender norm she tackles it the best she can, even rejecting the norms whenever possible. When Jeff attempts to mimic Chuck, Anna shuts him
Even when examining Anna’s early relationship with Jeff, when she arranges for him to come up on weekends with Chuck. He protests saying, “Jesus, I don’t even know the guy…why didn’t you call me first” (Wallace, 315). Her insecurity about whether or not Jeff would come up on weekends without this convenience allowed for a lack of communication of feelings between Jeff and Anna. However, of more importance is Anna’s lack of communication with Peter. A large part of what makes Anna herself is her ability and love of creating stories. When her husband does not share this, Anna finds this challenging, and lets it become a barrier for communication. “His face set in the pained expression he wears for conversations like this – “What ifs” speculations. When Jennifer and I sit in a restaurant making up stories about the people around us, he closes his eyes, just as he’s doing now” (Wallace, 317). Peters almost dismissal through the closing his eyes of Anna’s love for story making allows for a distancing and ultimately a deep seeded feeling of isolation and

Open Document