Stranger Than Paradise Film Analysis

810 Words2 Pages

In any work, interesting things do not happen to a character because they are the protagonist. Instead, they are the protagonist because interesting things happen to them. This logic is easy to understand—why would we watch a character if nothing happens to them that we do not already see everyday? For many, there is no interest, and, as such, Hollywood and its ilk have sought to focus on the extraordinary, explosive, and loud. Yet overtime—and possibly in a backlash against the growing trends in Hollywood—independent directors have explored the quiet, inconsequential moments of life as their focus, and have found that there is quite a bit to say about the so called nothing plot. By analyzing and comparing three indie films from the last thirty years (Stranger than Paradise, Boyhood, and Man Push Cart), I will argue the moments in film dedicated to mundane, everyday actions …show more content…

in 1984) is a film that fully embraces trivial, mundane actions as acted out by its trio of decidedly hipster protagonists. The film concerns itself with daily actions of eating T.V. dinners, playing cards, watching movies (to which we are treated to the protagonists’ blank faces rather than the film itself) and long car rides to such an extent that ordinary life is the only thing that could be considered the plot. Filmed in black and white and with still, slow camera work framing each shot like a scene to be acted out on stage, Stranger than Paradise finds artistry in the ugly landscapes of post-industrial commercial districts, cheap hotels, and supposedly beautiful locals ruined by bad weather. Such settings and actions are common in life, yet so rarely presented in film as they are familiar enough to the point of being invisible—so routine as to not be worthy of comment. Yet Stranger than Paradise is obsessed with such sequences, finding a humor in the mundane and a fondness for those who act it

More about Stranger Than Paradise Film Analysis

Open Document