Analysis Of Sherlock Holmes And Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

1524 Words4 Pages

For over one hundred years, Sherlock Holmes has created the captive image of any fictional detective to this day in age. Any fan of murder mystery sees Sherlock as an iconic symbol, but why? The literary work of the writer for Sherlock Holmes, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, extends the use of literary tools to create his masterpiece. Doyle’s legendary work use wonderful character development that truly defines friendship, wonderful plot that leaves the reader guessing until the very end, or the stunning setting of literary London that seems to vacuum any reader from reality. Sherlock quotes his story better than anyone 's in a beautiful way with “Omne ignotum pro magnifico” ( Everything unknown is taken) (71). Sir Arthur Conan Doyle created 52 short …show more content…

Readers can praise Sherlock Holmes stories for all the books worth, but what makes the books worth so much? What is a Sherlock without his Watson? The two characters compliment each other so well. Every short story is told through the perspective of John Watson with the same introduction along the lines of “You could not possibly have come at a better time, my dear Watson” (1). In the case of the short story, Watson accidentally intrudes on a conversation with Sherlock and a client Mr. Jabez Wilson. Jabez’s problem occurs as something strange, when he was being assimilated to join a group based on their red hair. Jabez with his blazing red hair gracely joins as there is a lot of money involved. The only stipulation is to “copy the Encylopaedia Britannica” (86) for four hours. After two month 's worth of work, The Red-Headed League disavows. Mr. Jabez inquires about their disappearance to the landlord only to find the landlord had no clue they existed. After Mr. Jabez explains his story, Sherlock begins to plot his next course. Sherlock sees the underlying detail that most …show more content…

For all of the skill of finer detail, Doyle’s plots can have a few holes. Rena Korb has a master’s degree in English and notes Doyle’s problem as, “ Where did the criminals put the dirt they dug out of the ground to make the tunnel?...Holmes and Clay are clearly acquainted…(Clay) must have recognized Holmes at the pawnshop” (222) Other critics praise the books for the wonderful detail, Michael Atkinson credits Holmes by “Insignificant actions become significant in light of later revelations, one person’s becomes another’s...the irrational is revealed to be reason itself” (225) Holmes’s character is also called into question. Watson praises Holmes in the story as a “And you are a benefactor of the race” (125). Even though Holmes can be above human, Holmes suffers from a common problem that is quite unethical. Gordon L. Iseminger notes “Holmes has one serious vice, but it was fittingly and excusably aristocratic, He was addicted at last for a time to cocaine….Only cocaine would suffice to drive away the ordinariness of life and allow the free play of his great intelligence” (228) Although Holmes’s addiction does not define him, the vice he shares has no place in modern day. Holmes addiction was a common occurrence during the Victorian time period but the vice is still a breach in his

Open Document