Doll's House Critical Analysis

1160 Words3 Pages

In Doll’s House,” Ibsen presents us with the drama of Torvald and Nora Helmer, a husband and wife who have been married for eight years. Nora leaves at the end of the play because she just want to experience her freedom, also she is tired of her husband torald treats her like his doll. Nora independence would affect the kids and her marriage positively. After she left her husband, she would be able to build herself to be a woman every man would want to marry because she has learnt from her past experience. If Nora will return to the home she will have learned self-discipline and her kids will have to learn how to be independent because that will be all Nora is used to, so she will not accept any other behavior that the kids learnt with their father. In the end the kids will benefit because when they want and need something they will know how to work for it. But if she stay the children may struggle to find their independence When we see the relationship of Nora and Torvalds We hear a reference to her father, whom Nora says is …show more content…

We see a woman who is making a bold action against gender inequality and the position society and culture has given her. As for Nora, we see in this first conversation that she seems entirely dependent on Torvald for her money, her food, and her shelter, despite the fact that she is keeping a secret. This secret is the kernel of her individuality and her escape from the doll’s house. While it is easy to paint Helmer as a tyrant and Nora as the naïve wife who suffers under his control, one must not forget that torvald is not aware of any damage he is causing. His greatest sin is perhaps his ignorance. The shock he shows at Nora’s revelation shows that he has no awareness that there is anything wrong with the status balance in his

Open Document