Compare And Contrast A Rose For Emily And The Great Gatsby

1179 Words3 Pages

F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby and William Faulkner’s A Rose for Emily uses setting, characterization, and figurative language to show us how old money is selfish and responsible with their money and how new money is selfless, but uses their money unwisely. Fitzgerald’s uses setting to describe how West Egg and East Egg represent new money and old money. West Egg represents the new money and East Egg, the old money. While they seem quite similar at first, because they are expensive places to live. West Egg is described as “the less fashionable of the two, although there is little contrast between them.” But, yet there are many differences. Such as when Nick describes his own house as "an eyesore" that is "squeezed between …show more content…

“Gatsby’s house was still empty when I left — the grass on his lawn had grown as long as mine.” This use of figurative language helps us to understand when Gatsby acted like old money, he kept his lawn cut and neat. When he died and his cover was exposed his lawn was like Nick’s and we see how he was on the same social ladder with Nick. This maybe why Nick was Gatsby’s only friend. ”Her voice is full of money," he said suddenly.” The use of this analogy reveals to us that Gatsby will not be able to get Daisy because he is considered new money and Daisy is old money and so is Tom. Daisy voice is full of money it’s sweet but it is selfish. The use of figurative language shows how Emily’s Father had raised Emily with a Strong old money tradition lifestyle that ruined her life. “So she vanquished them, horse and foot, just as she had vanquished their fathers thirty years before about the smell.” She did not correlate with the men of the town that were her age to care for her. Instead she only had her father and she held on to that. There was no way to go back to fix the meadow of the past. “The past is not a diminishing road but, instead, a huge meadow which no winter ever quite touches.” The use of figurative language differentiates new money and old money by comparing them to similar ideas. New money earns wealth and shares it. While old money is born with money and keeps it to themselves. New money did not carry the dignity of being rich and had been disapproved by the old money. "Fitzgerald portrays the newly rich as being vulgar, gaudy, ostentatious, and lacking in social graces and taste.” Old Money preferred to keep to themselves and made sure they were perceived as they wanted. “We are private. I have never regretted keeping something to myself. I have savored personal victories with a solitary cigar and cognac. I have nursed my wounded pride– and

Open Document