Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on: patriotism is not the thing of the past
Essay on patriotism in the USA
How vietnam war affected american society essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on: patriotism is not the thing of the past
America is filled with people with diversities of ethnicities, occupations, and their idiosyncrasies. This also includes people their unique personality. In order to be individualistic, he must not conform to anyone and allow himself to make any decision he wants without any pressure or any persuasion.
Although Americans are diverse and unique, due to their moralistic values, they often contradict themselves into doing what they genuinely want instead of following their moral values. Their individuality affects their values; for example, protecting their nation, a form of patriotism, even though they want to follow their value, some just want to stay alive and not have to fight. Some Americans believe that they have their own right to do what they want, which they do, but because they have their own mindset between what they want and what they should or need to do, this contradicts their values. Other values that are also affected by individualism is the relationship between success and equality, and collective safety.
One American value is patriotism, a love for one’s country. When one has patriotism in their own country, they would want to protect their country by supporting it or take some type of action to benefit their nation. When individuality plays a part as a value, patriotism, not always, withers away. In a novel named The Things They Carried by Tim O’Brien, illustrates his experience in the Vietnam War. When he got a notification to be drafted and right after attempted to flee the country, he noted to himself, “I feared the war, yes, but I also feared exile” (O’Brien 42). Fighting for one’s country is a way to show that they love their own country, but O’Brien’s quote show that he still wants to be part of the nation b...
... middle of paper ...
...Gatsby. New York, Charles Scribner’s Sons. 1925. Print.
Gladwell, Malcolm. “The 10,000-Hour Rule,” English Class. Distr. Mike Ried. Helix Charter High
School, La Mesa. 2014. Handout.
O’Brien, Tim. The Things They Carried. New York. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company,
1990. Print.
Orwell, George. “Shooting an Elephant.” English Class. Distr. Mike Ried. Helix Charter High School,
La Mesa. 2014. Handout.
Reynolds, Glenn Harlan. “NSA Spying Undermines Separation of Powers.” USA TODAY. 11 Feb.
2014: SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 16 May. 2014.
Robinson, Edwin Arlington. “Richard Cory.” English Class. Distr. Mike Ried. Helix Charter High
School, La Mesa. 2014. Handout.
Tucker, Neely. “In Poll, the Public is Just Fine with Government Snooping in the Name of Counterterrorism.” The Washington Post Company. 2013 Jun 12: SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 29
Nov. 2013.
...e with Vietnam; war and land, they forget the people the used to be. Tim O’Brien turned from a scholarly student with manners to a cold bully and Norman Bowker could not even grasp returning to his old life and had to end his altogether. The absence of morality in war can change a man to mimic the war itself, and in the current wars America is involved in, the same disillusionment is occurring. People both at home and involved in the war are losing their sense of patriotism because they cannot back a war they do not truly understand. When reading O’Brien’s “The Things They Carried”, readers should take a way an understanding that war without purpose does nothing but ruin the credibility of the country as well as the mental stability of all of those involved.
In times of great terror and panic, the citizens of a nation must decide what they value most: their right to privacy or the lives of the innocent. Government surveillance is criticized, however there are times in a nation’s history where, in order to ensure the safety of their citizens, they must surveill the country for potential hazards that might exist in the world. The government-issued program, COINTELPRO--a series of illegal projects during the twentieth century organized by the Federal Bureau of Investigation--while heavily criticized for its unconstitutional grounds--was justified because it benefitted the nation during a period of upheaval. COINTELPRO is popularly condemned by historians and professors such as Brandeis University Professor of Sociology, David Cunningham, who asserts that the FBI counterintelligence program was only a form of repression that allowed for the government to suppress matters that they consider bothersome (234). This however was not the case.
The voice of America bellows with the sound of freedom and individuality, which reflect the core values of the American society. This voice belongs to Ralph Waldo Emerson, a Transcendentalist writer, who outlines the main value of Americans: individualism. While Thoreau and Dickinson voice this supreme value, Ralph Waldo Emerson transcends these voices not only by discussing individualism, but as well by narrating how to achieve it.
For example, Mark Twain expressed his hatred by stating, “A patriot sets himself apart in his own country under his own flag, sneers at other nations and keeps an army of uniformed assassins on hand at heavy expense to grab slices of other people’s countries and keep them from grabbing slices of his. In the intervals between campaigns he washes the blood off his hands and works for ‘the universal brotherhood of man’ with his mouth.” Twain makes many valid points by bring up how patriotism encourages hatred and distrust for other countries, promoting war by having an army of assassins, and washing away wrongful violations within the country. Numerous Americans have shown similar controversy in regards to whether they should support patriotism. Despite the fact that patriotism can bring social culture and bonding together, it can ultimately become destructive and does more harm than
The Vietnam War was a very confrontational issue amongst numerous Americans during the 1960’s and 70’s. Many young Americans did not agree with fighting in the Vietnam War. In the essay “On the Rainy River,” by Tim O’Brien explains the struggle of a 21 year old American man who has been drafted to fight in the Vietnam War. The essay proposes the narrators predicament of not wanting to go to war and displays his reasons why. The narrator states that “American war in Vietnam seemed to [him as being] wrong [and he] saw no unity of purpose” (40). One main reason that the narrator and many Americans did not see any importance of the Vietnam War is because know one had a clear understanding of the reasons why the United States of America was fighting it. O’Brien creates a strong argument of why the 21 year old man does not want to go to war because of its strongly supported use of values and emotions, credibility, and logical reasoning.
In times of war, such as these, the importance for everyone to know where they stand on the idea of patriotism so they can voice or enact their opinion to the government and the people around them in a more clear and fair fashion is multiplied. The idea of patriotism can often be an obscure one, and during times of heightened security patriotism is a more spoken upon subject. Discussing the many different views of what patriotism means is a key step in better defining patriotism for all people. Barbara Kingsolver says in her article, “My patriotic duty is to recapture my flag from the men now waving it in the name of jingoism and censorship” (Pg. 2). What she means by this is that the idea of patriotism is being morphed into something it is not. She believes patriotism should encourage free speech and criticism of our leaders in times of difficult decisions. Instead, what is happening is patriotism is suggesting more fascist ideals than democratic ideals. Barbara believes her duty is to recapture the true meaning of patriotism and let everyone know what that meaning is. She wants everyone to feel open towards voicing t...
... and in doing so represent their country even more. Trying to be patriotic becomes hard for Brinker when his father wants him not to embarrass himself and do more for the country because Brinker feels that his father doesn?t understand that he is afraid to go to war. Brinker says", He and his crowd are responsible for it and we're going to fight it " (190). This quote shows how agitated Brinker is with his father for trying to tell him to accomplish more in a dangerous war, that Brinker wants nothing to do with, that can possibly lead to his own death. To sum up, patriotism is a necessity in going to war and representing the country because it shows feelings from the fighter to his or her country.
Finally, Tim O’Brien conveys how society’s view on courage plays an important part in the creation of guilt for soldiers in the Vietnam War. At the start of “On the Rainy River”, Tim O’Brien is drafted to be in the Vietnam War against his will. O’Brien says, “I was drafted to fight a war I hated...the American War in Vietnam seemed to me wrong.,” (40). However, regardless if one was against the war, they were forced to anyway. In adhesion, society developed one stance on the war pertaining to courage, which is that the man needs to do the bravest thing, which was to go to war and fight. Although this also ties with the theme of masculinity with men being tough, it more importantly exemplifies courage in going to risk your life for the good of the country.
Human beings all around the world are different in many ways. They all have their unique and physical characteristics, as well as different personalities. They each also have different ideas and thoughts on different topics. America is made up of a great amount of diverse people with diverse, even conflicting opinions and ideas. Diversity is a major component of the foundation of our country. The cliché of American as a salad bowl is extremely true. Every person is different and every person in his or her own way makes up a small part of America. Without the diversity of ideas and beliefs of Americans, the nation would not be nearly as successful as we are. A major similarity between Ralph Waldo Emerson's Self Reliance and J.D Salinger's Catcher in the Rye is a non-conformist ideology that both exhibit, and the idea that one should choose their own individuality above confomity.
Individualism is the idea of being self-reliant and favoring non-conformity. It is often seen as outlandish and bizarre and individualists tend to be ostracized by society. Individualism is not present in American society because people value the common American ideals. Qualities outside the norm are treated with distaste. A prime example of individualism vs. conformity would be the European colonization of Africa. The African people were exposed to the norms of European society and were taught that it was universal. Africans had the choice of either conforming to this “universal norm” or staying true to their ancient culture. Those who sided with conformists believed that obedience guaranteed them safety. Individualists on the other hand, who valued their venerable civilization, did not receive the same benefits that the conformists did. They were less successful because they did not fit with the changing society. The story Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe tells of this tale. The protagonist Okonkwo was an individualist who did not want change. He did not agree with the colonists’ point of view and decide...
Do you stand alone as a unique and special individual? Since the beginning of American history there have been struggles for individualism. The American Revolution, the American Civil War, and the separation from family life are all examples of individualism in American history. Individualism is an American paradigm designed by the modern societal structure that is an altered idea of the foundation by immigrants. In today’s society the struggle for individualism is more personal and represents how American values have shifted since the beginning of American history.
national identity” (Pease 109). “American exceptionalism comes from our freedom. It began with life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, but that was only the beginning. We also enjoy freedom of religion, freedom of the press, the right to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. No other nation has given so much freedom or enumerated them so clearly. The United States has done more to provide for individual freedom than any other country in history. No wonder so many want to call the United States home” (Hutchison). The concept of exceptionalism has evolved from a contrast and superiority to Europe which was a society where much depends on your origins, to a new world where through struggles of the past and liberation anything is possible and freedom widely available. While the concept of exceptionalism could be applied to other nations, America embodies the characteristics most predominantly and effectively through the core beliefs, American ideals and its
This is a very prominent social norm. Many Americans tend to view themselves as their own person before they associate themselves with their family or the United States. From a young age, children are taught that individuality is extremely important as long as he or she does not defy any social norms. Numerous adult Americans believe that being unique and having different abilities can improve the country. In many countries, American individualism is viewed as ill-mannered, although American individualism is not as it always seems
different backgrounds. No two Americans are alike. Americans may follow different religions. They may also speak different languages. They can also be from different countries. The time when the most major differences in Americans were seen was during the time of people like Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, and Thomas Paine. Three elements that I find most important American identity at this point in time are the belief that all people should have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and having a high priority for religious freedom, and feeling that the people of a government have the
Does one’s life belong to himself or to the community/society he lives in? Well, perspective varies from person to person. If you go and take private data from people you meet and analyze the data, you would see the diversity in opinions. Those opinions have their distinct evidence to back standout. Technically, every argument being raised can be expressed as a two-way street. It’s true that more or less than half the people you obtain the data from likely to choose individualism and the rest would likely to choose collectivism for public good; but, what really matters is which group has more weight on their side, and by weight, I mean the individual’s capability in debugging the context the finest way possible and demonstrating the understanding