According to the Missouri Compromise, Slavery Would be Tolerated Everywhere or No Where

1550 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Slavery and servitude history

In the early 1800’s slavery was a very big issue. Southern farmers and plantation owners believed it was their right to own slaves. Northern abolitionists felt that slavery should have been illegal everywhere. The North and South fought over if and where slavery should be legal. A man named James Tallmadge proposed an amendment that would have ended slavery. This bill was opposed by the south and ultimately failed. Then a man by the name of John Taylor tried to pass a similar bill to end slavery as a whole only to meet the same result. Both bills failed and with the north and south at each others throats, it looked as if it was going to separate the nation and cause a war between the North and South. But then a senator by the name of Henry Clay thought of an idea. By taking advantage of his position he influenced the house to accept a compromise created by Jesse B. Thomas between what the North and South wanted. This was called the Missouri Compromise. During the late year of 1819, Missouri wanted to be recognized as a state. This however scared the north as they wanted to be a slave state. Missouri becoming a slave state would have disrupted the balance and caused the number of slaves state to be higher than that of the free states. The north feared this because that meant that slaves states would be dominant over free states and give the south the advantage in congress. With the North being represented by senator Rufus King and the South represented by William Pinkney, congress debated from December 1819 to March 1820. Luckily around the same time that Missouri applied for statehood, so did Maine. The north saw this opportunity and quickly used it to keep the balance and please the war ready south. It was implemented in 1... ... middle of paper ... ...h many slaves were able to escape to free places such as Haiti and Canada, others were not so lucky. The Missouri Compromise was a very successful yet flawed document that stalled the civil war for at least thirty years. The compromise framed the westward expansion of slavery. It set many laws in regards to slavery that would hold the northerners from lashing out at the southerners and sharing the war even earlier. Lastly it separate the economic, political and ethical interests and beliefs of the northern, southern and western regions of the U.S. Although it delayed the Civil war by at least thirty years, it was inevitable. Eventually the issue of slavery would have to be faced head on. Slavery was either going to be tolerated everywhere or no where at all. The North had decided that slavery wouldn't be tolerated and the south seceded from the united states.

Show More
Related

  • Sectionalism Versus Nationalism and the Era of Good Feelings

    627 Words  | 2 Pages

    The United States began to dissatisfy some of its citizens and so the concerns of sectionalism, or the split of the country began to arise. There was a continuous riff between the south and the north over a few issues, a major one being slavery. The south argued that the slaves were necessary to support the southern economy. According to document A, the south were angry that the north was creating taxes that hurt the southern economy, thus increasing the need for slavery since they had to make up for the expense of the taxes. The south felt that the north was able...

    Read More

  • Olaudah Equiano And Phillis Wheatley's View On Religion

    1464 Words  | 3 Pages

    Almost all the slaves were born in the New World; with the end of the Atlantic slave trade, the diasporic population lost all touch with their indigenous culture. Although a few individuals afforded comfortable living conditions, most free black men and slaves still suffered deplorable conditions that followed the lack of education, wealth and political privilege. To ameliorate the conditions, free blacks determined to revoke the barricades that prevented them from getting formal education and enfranchisement rights; meanwhile, slaves continued to fortify their communal practices through religion and escape the appalling conditions by fleeing to the northern states through the Underground Railroad

    Read More

  • The Monroe Doctrine Was A Bold Statement Of American Foreign Policy

    1234 Words  | 3 Pages

    This deal was one of the reasons why the Civil War happened. The Missouri Compromise was a deal between the north and south to allow Missouri into the Union as a slave state, while Maine came in as a free state. This deal made sure of a foreboding civil war between the North and the South. This deal was a big mistake, as the north and south grew closer to a civil war. The Missouri Compromise was one of the biggest mistakes in American history.

    Read More

  • Essay On The Compromise Of 1850

    1469 Words  | 3 Pages

    Abolishment of slavery was it important to the slaves that were in the Washington D.C territory they were no longer being able to be passed in D.C.. This gave the North a really big advantage in the way that they would use them as an example saying if they are doing it why is it still allowed in the south. The slaves being freed caused far more problems and casualties in states of the union many affecting the growth and census of the states,The slave growing population, together with those enslaved, organized churches, private schools, benevolent societies and businesses it was also in a direct correlation with the Missouri compromise. One other big subject the the Compromise of 1850 and the Emancipation Proclamation had in common with the Missouri Compromise was it created a little more separation in the land versus the

    Read More

  • The Compromise of 1850

    385 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Kansas-Nebraska Act was a great victory for the south. The greatest benefit to the south was the repeal of the Missouri Compromise, which established the sacred 36-30 line. If the Missouri Compromise had stayed in place, there would have been no more possibility for the expansion of slavery, since there was no land left south of the 36-30 line; under the Missouri Compromise southern expansion was hampered by the existence of the Gulf of Mexico. As a result of the line being repealed, it was possible for slavery to exist in the territories of Kansas and Nebraska because of popular sovereignty.

    Read More

  • Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad

    1559 Words  | 4 Pages

    Becoming a slave was terrible; someone was either born a slave or kidnapped. When slavery first started, white Europeans went into Africa and kidnapped African Americans. As the years went on this process became too difficult for the Europeans, so they established hundred of trading station along Africa’s West Coast. Local African rulers and black merchants delivered the captured people to the posts and them sell as slaves.

    Read More

  • The Missouri Compromise

    509 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the beginning, the Missouri Compromise was actually weakening any difficult situations between the sections. The Compromise of 1820 stopped the crisis between the North and the South., when they had to decide whether the Missouri should be a free state or slave state....

    Read More

  • Dbq Missouri Compromise

    823 Words  | 2 Pages

    At the same time, the South thought of only what they wanted and not what was good for the sake of the union. When Missouri sent its request to congress to become a state, the public didn’t take it very well. The South wanted the soon-to-be state to be proslavery while the North wanted to prevent slavery from flooding the territory. Missouri’s request brought fighting, and to settle the fighting and bring balance back to the nation, the North created The Missouri Compromise. The Missouri Compromise was an agreement that Missouri can be a slave state and that Maine would also be added as a free state in order to restore the balance between slave and free states. Instead of reducing the violent fights, they brought more to the crumbling nation. All the catastrophic fights kept escalating. All the North wanted to do was bring balance between states and stay one peaceful

    Read More

  • The Causes Of The Louisiana Purchase

    948 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...hern states but trying to encompass the preceding French and Spanish rule (for instance, Spain had prohibited slavery of Native Americans in 1769, but some slaves of mixed African-Native American descent were still being held in St. Louis when the US took over the Louisiana Territory). In a freedom suit that went from Missouri to the US Supreme Court, slavery of Native Americans was finally ended in 1836.The institutionalization of slavery under US territorial law in the Louisiana Territory contributed to the American Civil War a half century later. As states organized within the territory, the status of slavery in each state became a matter of contention in Congress, as southern states wanted slavery extended to the west, and northern states just as strongly opposed new states being admitted as slave states. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was a temporary solution.

    Read More

  • Dbq : A Failure Of Compromise

    1429 Words  | 3 Pages

    Throughout the period of Antebellum there were many compromises made regarding slavery: The ⅗ compromise in 1787, the Missouri Compromise in 1820, the Tariff of 1833, and finally the compromise. With so many agreements made between the North and the South, why was america not able to make a compromise in 1861 when the secession crisis was happening? What happened between 1787 to 1861 causing the United States to change from a country of compromising opponents to a country of fighting enemies? The answer answer is not so simple.There are a myriad of factors which resulted in the ultimate failure of compromise, but the most important ones are as follows: The imbalance of power between the North and South made it incapable for the two sides to make a compromise that would be in the southerners own self interest, disillusionment with the nature of compromisation made neither the North nor the South want to work it out, and finally the growing divide between the two regions, along with clashing political beliefs caused an animosity between them that could not be reconciled by mere compromise.

    Read More

  • Missouri Compromise And The Compromise Of 1850

    486 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the mid 1800’s, the topic of slavery became the reason for many debates and compromises, such as the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850. Arguments on whether slavery should go into the territories, or even be allowed in the country, kept coming.

    Read More

  • What Were the Key Issues Leading To the Civil War?

    2033 Words  | 5 Pages

    As the country began to grow and expand we continued to see disagreements between the North and South; the Missouri Territory applied for statehood the South wanted them admitted as a slave state and the North as a free state. Henry Clay eventually came up with the Missouri Compromise, making Missouri a slave state and making Maine it’s own state entering the union as a free state. After this compromise any state admitted to the union south of the 36° 30’ latitude would be a slave state and a state north of it would be free. The country was very much sectionalized during this time. Thomas Jefferson felt this was a threat to the Union. In 1821, he wrote, ”All, I fear, do not see the speck on our horizon which is to burst on us as a tornado, sooner or later. The line of division lately marked out between the different portions of our confederacy is such...

    Read More

  • Similarities Between 1850 And Missouri Compromise Of 1850

    587 Words  | 2 Pages

    The compromise of 1850 was very similar to the Missouri compromise of 1820 in that they both succeeded in bringing together the North and the South. In the early 18th century, there was division in America as result of slavery. At that particular point, the North and South were already in tension due to issue of slavery. Slavery was not widely spread in the North however, businessmen enriched themselves through slave trade in the south. Both Missouri Compromise and Compromise of 1850 both aimed at restoring peace between the North and South slave sated and between the Free and the Slave states.

    Read More

  • Enlightenment in Latin America

    533 Words  | 2 Pages

    Haiti had over a half million enslaved Africans working on sugar plantations owned by the French. The sugar was hugely profitable, but conditions for enslaved worker were horrendous. Many were cruelly over worked and under fed. Haiti also had a population of both free and enslaved mulattoes. Free mulattoes, however, had few right and were badly treated by the French. In 1791, a slave revolt exploded in northern Haiti. Under the able leadership of Toussaint L'Ouverture, Haitians would fight for freedom and pave the way for throwing off French rule.

    Read More

  • Slavery in Beloved, by Toni Morrison

    1972 Words  | 4 Pages

    order for a slave to be truly free, they had to escape physically first, and once that

    Read More

More about According to the Missouri Compromise, Slavery Would be Tolerated Everywhere or No Where

Open Document