The Accidental Death of an Anarchist and The Government Inspector

The Accidental Death of an Anarchist and The Government Inspector

Length: 1383 words (4 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Excellent

Open Document

Essay Preview

More ↓
Identity and Insanity in The Accidental Death of an Anarchist and The Government Inspector In the plays "The Accidental Death of an Anarchist" written by Dario Fo, and "The Government Inspector", written by Nikolai Gogol, ‘identity' and ‘insanity' play vital roles. The Maniac, who is the protagonist of "The Accidental Death of An Anarchist", is seen changing his identity throughout the play, pretending to be various other people. Khlestakov, the protagonist of "The Government Inspector" lands in the position of being an inspector by chance, and throughout the play he thoroughly exploits this opportunity by making the most of this particular identity. It is this characteristic of both protagonists that drives the audience to a point where they may start doubting the sanity of these two characters. These two ‘ingredients' of insanity and identity have been blended with perfection and the audiences appreciate both plays, their motives and the impeccable characterization.
Identity is also the set of characteristics that somebody recognizes as belonging uniquely to himself or herself and constituting his or her individual personality for life. The protagonist of "Accidental Death of an Anarchist" is the Maniac. As the name suggests, his character is most often considered to be "insane" by the audience.

How to Cite this Page

MLA Citation:
"The Accidental Death of an Anarchist and The Government Inspector." 18 Oct 2019

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

Grey Area in Accidental Death and The Assault Essay

- The conflict between good and evil does not always manifest itself in clear black and white terms. Sometimes in order to accomplish the greater goals for good the “good guys” must fight back in a grey area. This is the case in Accidental Death of an Anarchist by Dario Fo and The Assault by Harry Mulisch. In the Assault the underground fighters cost civilian lives and use sometimes questionable methods in their attempts to rid Holland of Nazi power. In Fo’s Accidental Death of an Anarchist the protagonist Maniac leaves the corrupt police to die after activating a bomb in the police station....   [tags: Dario Fo, Harry Mulisch, compare, contrast,]

Research Papers
1012 words (2.9 pages)

Essay about Accidental Death of an Anarchist and One for the Road

- In both Accidental Death of an Anarchist and One for the Road, Dario Fo and Harold Pinter respectively orient their stories around violent actions which are never truly witnessed on stage. Pinter has described One for the Road as bordering upon agitprop, and indeed, the play’s brutal yet vague examination of an interrogation is a hauntingly accurate portrayal of government-sanctioned torture. Given the violent nature of the story that Pinter creates, the script could very easily call for gratuitous amounts of unsettling and gory on stage interactions between Nicolas and the family he is interrogating....   [tags: Dario Fo, Harold Pinter, Unwitnessed Violence]

Research Papers
822 words (2.3 pages)

Essay on The Accidental Tourist

- At times The Accidental Tourist presents its self as a gentle comedy. This is shown by the characters humour: the ineffectual Macon and the Brash Muriel, Edward the Neurotic dog, the eccentric Leary's and Julian the playboy courting Rose the old fashioned romantic. There is the amusement value of situations like Macon's method of washing clothes, the impenetrable ‘vaccination', and the disastrous thanks giving turkey. Anne Tyler sees the joke in the human behaviour, and presents it in a way that allows the audience to become engaged and laugh at the characters....   [tags: Comedy Accidental Tourist]

Free Essays
751 words (2.1 pages)

Heroin : An Accidental Death Essay

- On the day Philip Seymour Hoffman died of an apparent heroin overdose, so did roughly 100 other Americans. “People say Hoffman was a smart guy, that he should have known it was bad. Of course he knew it was bad – the problem is, his brain was constantly telling him that some heroin would be a very good idea” (Haupt). Overdosing is now the leading cause of accidental death in the U.S., ahead of traffic fatalities and gun homicides. “Individuals who become addicted to prescription opiates often switch to heroin because it is less expensive than many illicit pharmaceutical narcotics” (MacLaren)....   [tags: Heroin, Addiction, Drug addiction, Morphine]

Research Papers
770 words (2.2 pages)

Examining Who is Responsible for Eva's Death in Priestly's Play, An Inspector Calls

- The play ‘An Inspector Calls’ is set in the North Midlands, the industrial city of Brumley in 1912. The play revolves around the death of a young girl named Eva Smith and the wealthy, middle class Birling family. The Birling family consists of four main members. In addition, there is Gerald Croft who is engaged to the daughter of the family, Sheila Birling, and the maid Edna who plays a small role in the play. Throughout Priestley’s play, ‘An inspector calls’, a main theme runs about responsibility and differentiation between classes....   [tags: An Inspector Calls, Literary Analysis]

Research Papers
1136 words (3.2 pages)

The Character of the Inspector in An Inspector Calls Essay

- Analyse the character of the Inspector in An Inspector Calls by J.B. Priestley. Discuss his: * Role in the play * Effect on the other characters * Stage presence When the Inspector first knocks on the front door, it is dramatic irony because Arthur just said a matter of seconds before of how he ‘might get a knighthood if we don’t get into any sort of trouble’. This is a very significant time of entering, similar to knocking over a tower of Jenga – everything one has hoped for has just evaporated into thin air....   [tags: An Inspector Calls]

Free Essays
2561 words (7.3 pages)

The Role of the Inspector in An Inspector Calls Essay examples

- The Role of the Inspector in 'An Inspector Calls' An Inspector Calls is a play with many social and political messages. J. B. Priestley believed a great deal in socialism and he used several of his plays to try and influence people to be Socialist as well. It was written in a time when Britain was ruled by a Labour government and socialist policies were seen as the way forward. It was a popular way of thinking at that time so Priestley's aim for the play was probably to teach the unconvinced. The Inspector in J....   [tags: An Inspector Calls]

Research Papers
4709 words (13.5 pages)

Who is Most Responsible for the Death of Eva Smith in An Inspector Calls

- Who is Most Responsible for the Death of Eva Smith in An Inspector Calls An Inspector Calls is what is known as a well constructed play. Its progression is that of ignorance to knowledge. The characters are the Birling family, Gerald Croft and of course the formidable Inspector Goole. All the characters start off in a lulled sense of security. Sheila begins very pleased with her life and with her fiancé Gerald Croft, as one might who is getting married. Gerald is introduced as the well-bred upper-class man about town....   [tags: An Inspector Calls J.B. Priestley Essays]

Research Papers
2068 words (5.9 pages)

Essay on The Role of Inspector Goole in An Inspector Calls

- The Role of Inspector Goole in An Inspector Calls    In the work, An Inspector Calls, Inspector Goole role has been a described as a staging device.  Yet, defining Inspector Goole as meerly a staging device implies that he is not a character in his own right but exists simply as a way of exploring the personalities and lives of other, more fully rounded, characters. While it is true that An Inspector Calls would not work without Inspector Goole's central role, it reduces him a little to refer to him as 'just' a staging device....   [tags: An Inspector Calls Essays]

Research Papers
1202 words (3.4 pages)

The Presentation of the Inspector in An Inspector Calls Essay

- The Presentation of the Inspector in An Inspector Calls J.B. Priestley was born in Yorkshire on 13th September 1894. He gained his writing experience in the years before the war 1911-1914; he did not work among professional writers; he was around “people who read a great deal, cared a lot for at least one of the arts, and preferred a real talk and hot arguments to social chit-chat.” Despite having grown up into his father’s circle of socialist friends, he found himself joining in in their political discussions/arguments....   [tags: J.B. Priestley An Inspector Calls Plays Essays]

Free Essays
1394 words (4 pages)

The primary reason for this is that he assumes multiple identities throughout the play. He adapts characteristics of different people in different occupations.
Maniac:" It's more of a hobby, really- playing other people. I'll do anybody!"
At the very beginning of the play the audience is familiarized with the Maniac's "hobby", as he is being interrogated by Bertozzo. The Maniac is perceived as a quick-witted person but also very nosey. His curiosity is what instigates him to take up other identities. When he is in Bertozzo's office and he reads a report that the case of the Anarchist's death is being investigated, he decides to become the judge that everyone is expecting. The audience can relate to his character as we often find ourselves being inquisitive and intuitive to quench our thirst for knowledge.
Dario Fo, however, had an ulterior motive. He was inspired by the Piazza Fontana and the death of Pino Pinelli to write this play. However, the Maniac is the only character who is not derived from one of the people involved in the actual incident. Fo, in an interview, said, "The fool plays the part of the judge, carrying the logic of the authorities to absurd extremes, and discovering that there are inconsistencies." He appears to have created the character of the Maniac to unravel the truth. To facilitate this, he makes the Maniac change his identities. Joseph Farrell, professor of Italian, University of Strathclyde has commented on the character of the Maniac by saying, "He wears the mask of the academic psychiatrist, magistrate, bishop and member of the forensic squad. In himself, he is no one."
Khlestakov, the protagonist of "The Government Inspector", is a charming and appealing character. His charisma influences both men and women into liking him and favoring him. However, he shares a similar position with the Maniac-of pretending to be something that he is not. In the play, he finds himself stranded in a small provincial town and he pretends to be a government inspector whom the local officials were expecting. At first the officials mistook him to be the government inspector.
"Bobchinsky: Yes, Sir, that's him. That's the Official!
Mayor: What official?
Bobchinsky: The Official! The one you received a warning about: The government inspector.
However, as they start to bribe him and treat him as if he were royalty, he decides to play along and make the most of it. He is glad to adapt to his new identity and exploits the situation. He is lured into this false identity by his greed. Even when he is pretending to be the government inspector he is still being greedy.
"Be careful what you pretend to be because you are what you pretend to be"-Kurt Vonnegut.
It can be observed that the Maniac as well as Khlestakov are both paradigms of basic human traits such as greed and curiosity leading to false identity.
Nikolai Gogol, like Fo had a hidden motive behind the changing identity of Khlestakov. He has created the character of Khlestakov to fulfill the purpose of exposing the corrupt nature of local administration. As, the officials thought he was the government inspector they tried to bribe him and the audience was made aware of their deceitful nature. He has chosen to give Khlestakov the false identity of a government inspector so that he can unravel the truth, which was the obvious motive of Dario Fo as well.
Maniac: "Yes, if I were a sane person. But I am mad. I have a certificate."
This dialogue is met with great laughter from the audience. Fo has created the "insane" character of the Maniac to add to the humour of the play. He talks to himself as well as non-living objects around him. His dialogues are blunt and clearly reflect his insanity. At some point his multiple identities is what leads the audience to think he is insane. However, there is a thin line between insanity and wisdom. Some might perceive the Maniac to be crazy and bizarre to be fond of changing his identity at the drop of a hat. Some, however, might think that he has a superior motive for his changing identities and that he is an extremely intelligent and talented individual to be able to adapt to multiple identities with such ease and be so natural at it. Whether it is quick-wittedness or insanity, his character brings the stage alive by its presence and arouses laughter in the audience.
The character of Khlestakov in The Government Inspector is not insane in the same context as the Maniac. He can be considered "insane" for not realizing his limits. He is a young flamboyant character who has no consideration for others. He does not realize the consequences of his acts and sometimes behaves in a certain manner which leads the audience to think he is crazy. For example, when he is dining at the Governor's house with the other officials present, he has a lot to drink and behaves in an appalling manner under the influence of alcohol. He claims to have written great works of literature and also refers to himself as "His Excellency". However, it is his false identity which drives him to "insanity". Greed and power makes him cross the limit while pretending to be the government inspector. Gogol has created this character to stand out amongst others. He owes loyalty to none and has an air about him. His extravagant talks and exaggerated praise of himself add not only to his insanity but also to the humour of the play. Just like Fo, Gogol has succeeded in creating a character which will stay in the minds of the audiences for a long time after they have watched the play.
The plays have both identity and insanity as two of the main elements. This has a double impact on the audiences. Both the playwrights have successfully blended both these elements with great skill and brilliance. In the plays it is the false identity that leads to the insanity, which in turn adds to humour and catalyses the formation of the overall theme of the play. It is our laughter that affects us the most and they have brilliantly used comedy as a medium to urge us to contemplate, to go home after watching the play and mull over the ulterior purpose of the play. The effect that this has on the audience is enduring. Fo once said, "The people does not use the dramatic methods of aristocracy, the one which grabs at heart and guts, but attempts to get there by a violent moment of laughter. Because laughter really does remain at the bottom of the mind, leaving sediment which cannot be wiped off."
The rationale of the plays is deeply embedded in the minds of the audience. They go home thinking about them, intensely influenced by the impressive characterization and the remarkable way in which the playwrights have proposed their intentions and beliefs. Both plays, in my opinion, are extremely successful in terms of receiving the desired audience reaction and establishing the fundamental motives of their plays in the mind of audience.
Return to