There is a popular saying that states: “Two heads are better than one.” Many believe that human beings work more efficiently and make more reasonable decisions when working in a group. Collaboration is an action that is present in every social group, in every workplace, and in every field. However, human beings are also highly competitive. Like collaboration, competition is present in every aspect of life. Undoubtedly, collaboration and competition have provided a path to innumerable achievements in many fields, and science is not an exception. It sounds like a contradiction, but collaboration and competition go hand-in-hand in the field of science. Watson and Creek’s article, “A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid”, is an example of this …show more content…
For this reason, scientists “compete” to make groundbreaking discoveries. The discovery of the structure of DNA is not the only instance when this is evident. It was also noticeable in the race between the United States and the Soviet Union to put the first man in space, as well as when scientists were trying to decipher the sequence of the human genome. Several years ago the competition was not as evident due to the fact that the possibilities of research were “endless”. There was a vast amount of discoveries to be made. The problem is that as the years have gone by, the field of study has become narrower and more specific as new discoveries require more in-depth study. Also, the governments’ interest in scientific research has grown over the years. There is greater interest in the discoveries of new applicable knowledge and the development of new …show more content…
Collaboration and competition exist together. They are both present in every aspect of life. Competition requires a certain degree of collaboration in order to be considered a competition. Competition leads to collaboration since people unite to try to come up with a better product than someone else. These are the building blocks of science. They are what keep the discipline moving forward. They are what motivate scientists every day to push to develop new theories and technologies. They stimulated Watson and Crick into discovering the structure of deoxyribose nucleic acid which, in turn, led to many important discoveries that are applicable to every human being. As Simon Sinek said: “Competition pushes you to better yourself.” And as Alexander Graham Bell said: “Great discoveries and improvements invariably involve the cooperation of many minds. I may be given credit for having blazed the trail, but when I look at the subsequent developments I feel the credit is due to others rather than to
In this case, the reward for winning the “competition” is so significant that better opportunities are overlooked and some are left without the aid they need. When Watson and Crick ask Rosalind Franklin’s opinion on their model of DNA, the result they are looking for is far from what they had hoped: “Rosy did not give a hoot about the priority of...
Both in fiction and in real life a certain breed of scientists has decided to ignore the scientific method and chase dreams of fame. With that fame, they hope to dig deep into our pockets and reap the benefits of their poor workmanship. It is most evident from the examples given that these scientists, who have seemingly reversed scientific evolution, no longer care for true science and the scientific method, but rather are interested in personal glory.
How Watson and Crick’s Discovery of the Structure of DNA Influenced American Industries and Scientific Development in the United States
It is clear throughout the “Double Helix” that there are a set of well-defined norms that underlie the actions of the researchers in the labs discussed by Watson. These norms are consistent throughout Watson’s tale and shape much of the narrative, they include: competitiveness between labs, a vast network of interdisciplinary shared information that Merton would refer to as communism, and a rigid hierarchy that determines to some extent whose work is deemed credible. These norms affected each of the players in Watson’s book to different degrees, and both helped and hindered the advancement of discovery.
“When we consider scientific research as group problem- solving, instead of the unveiling of individual brilliance, diversity becomes key to excellence.” Pg.58 When it comes to scientific research, solving problems and working together is a more beneficial way to success, rather than working alone. This proves that a group of diverse people working together leads to success and can be more beneficial than one person working by his or herself. This quote supports what the author is stating because it explains what diversity is and how it can be beneficial in the real world. This shows how he uses good argument to explain and prove his point “He shows that, when trying to solve complex problems, progress often results from diverse perspectives. That is, the ability to see the problem differently, not simply ‘being smart,’ often is the key to a breakthrough. The author is quoting Professor Scott and how he stated that seeing ideas through a different perspective from a group of people is why diversity is beneficial. This supports the author’s claim that diversity is important because taking other people’s perspectives into consideration will help in the real world. This does a good job of supporting his claim and proves his argument and also establishing credibility by using the research he found in his article. This article is mainly directed towards the STEM field, however, he does state that diversity is important to all areas of life so he does a good job at proves how diversity is
Competition is seen daily amongst Pepsi and Coca-Cola. In most cases individuals even compare the two just because they are major competitors that are always creating and innovating new ideas. The key to competition always making sure there is a plan to become successful. Businesses have to always have to stay ahead of the game. The businesses must always be put into place and remain one step ahead of the competitor. One business may target only the elderly generation. While on the other hand another business is targeting the generation to come or the present generation. Children may not like what the older generation
A relevant example is the ‘Nasa’s Moon Survival Test’; it has shown during the class that when people work together, they share their ideas, experience and knowledge and they get a better score than when they do the test individually.
As time has progressed, a divide has been created between scientists and those who strongly...
In “The Nature and Necessity of Scientific Research” it says, “they are the source of the methods, problem-field, and standards of solution accepted by any mature scientific community at any given time.” These new discoveries can lead then to advancements and as a result can lead them to build a better society. Human beings will be able to reconstruct a better institutional framework which will bring them a prosperous and happy
Competition is everywhere in our daily lives. It begins from the day we are born until the day we die. Competition is just another word for challenge.
We are all born with a competitive nature. Our competitive nature drives us to want to be fierce competitors. We compete for resources in the forms of food, jobs, shelter and finding a mate to have the dominant bloodline survive. Sometimes we compete without even knowing it. This is how we grew up, competing for food at the dinner table, siblings competing for parent’s love and attention. As kids we take this competitive nature to school and compete for the best grades, teacher’s attention or sometimes we act out or we become the class clown. As adults we compete to see whose going to have the biggest home, the best cars and who makes the most money. Parents want the best for their kids and their future and will push them as far they can without seeing the repercussions later. Pushing kids beyond their limits and not allowing kids to be kids first will harm them later on in life: stun growth potential, and create insecure children who constantly seek approval.
Ancient China has a number of sayings about competition, such as, “seeking great honor results in no honor at all”. Theodore Isaac Rubin, a writer of both fiction and nonfiction, explains in his essay, “Competition and Happiness” competition seldom brings out the best and often brings out the worst in people. He argues that competition is a form of projection in which the development of self is abandoned to beat the next fellow. Rubin believes that, “competition is a residual of a primitive past, and it is not a genetic residual” (312). In the past, competition was necessary for people had to compete in order to survive. Even though, people were conditioned to compete in the past, it is not pertinent anymore as it became another aspect in the modern day. Rubin further states, “people brought up this way feel lost…because they exist to compete and they’ve lost their raison d’être in the new situation” (312) Learning to compete with others is taught by an individual’s family and the individual forgets why he/she is competing as they only focus on beating their fellow mates. Competition produces anxiety which can interfere with learning and disassociates with one’s own body. It is not instinctual because it is taught and it damages people and creates stress in their life. Competition teaches people to give their worst while as they only focus on what their fellow mate is doing. I agree with Rubin that “competition limit people’s ability to lead happy and satisfying lives”, for I am assured that competition is destructive to children's self-esteem, it interferes with learning, sabotages relationships, and isn't necessary to have a good time.
...t it is beneficial, healthy and provides a little competition. No one knows how much competition can drive a person, but a healthy competition between you and your peers can benefit you by creating innovative ideas and work ethic that are much required in this world.
Realizing that a group can become a high performance team is important. Accomplishing this goal is invaluable, advantageous and profitable. Once able to operate from a group to the high performing team is a great step into preparation into the big business world. Leaders and members must also realize not only how to accomplish this but that some problems will and can arise from different demographic characteristics and cultural diversity. That is if one is in such a group, which the probability would be quite high.
...ere is no competition, our minds would remain idle. Competition also helps us to get back on our feet. There can be no failure without competition and not all failure is bad. Learning from failure and overcoming it also helps us with future hurdles in life. Although we might be setback by many obstacles on the way to achieving what we want, we should not brood over such minor matters. Instead, we should find out where we wrong and change for the better. We should not be stubborn and try to do things our way but search for alternative methods that will help us to obtain success. Competition may also do good for our character and personality. An over-confident person may keep doing things his or her way in hope of getting what they want. However, after experiencing many disappointing failures, this proud and narrow-minded person may be humbled in the process of attempting to reach his or her goal.