Speeding Vs Speeding Essay

Question 3: To the best of your ability, indicate how the following ethical dilemmas might be resolved based on each stage of Kohlberg’s model of moral development: use Table 7.4 as a guide.

Speeding versus not speeding:

Stage 1: The fear of receiving a ticket for speeding could be enough to prevent an individual from committing the traffic violation.

Stage 2: Trying to satisfy personal desire maybe enough motivation to commit the offense of speeding. The fear of receiving a speeding ticket alone would probably not be enough to deter committing the offense. However, if an accumulation of points for previous speeding offenses jeopardizes the individual having his license suspended, that may be enough to prevent the speeding.

Stage 3: An individual may choose to speed to impress his or her

With that being said, it would be the opposite for authority figures such as parents, teachers, or coaches. By lying to them, it would jeopardize the individual’s good standing.

Stage 4: At this stage of moral development, one has accepted the social order of society. If it’s wrong to lie, than this person will tell the truth without questioning the merits of wrong and right.

Stage 5: At this stage, morality is strongly based on principal and not affected by what others think. Because lying would compromise a healthy society, these folks would prefer to tell the truth.

Stage 6: At the highest level of moral development, this minority group of people are extremely principled in moral development. Because they feel so strongly about possible injustices from societal rules and laws, these folks would be willing to lie if they believed it would prevent an unjust cause.

Cheating on an exam versus doing honest work

Stage 1: Cheating on an exam would involve being punished if caught. That fear of punishment would foster the moral choice to do honest