A Clashing of Opinions

1289 Words3 Pages

The “Mosaics: Reading and Writing Essays” textbook includes two essays with differing views on the effectiveness of anti-loitering laws. Richard Willard shares his opinion that anti-loitering laws are effective tools that discourage gang activity in his essay, “Anti-Loitering Laws Can Reduce Gang Violence.” He asserts that alternative methods of punishing gang members only cause them to develop animosity for police that leads to more trouble. Alternatively, “Anti-Loitering Laws Are Ineffective and Biased,” an essay written by David Cole, presents the view that these laws are a form of discrimination. Both authors support their opinions with statistics and previous examples of anti-loitering law enforcement.

Willard begins his essay by making broad generalizations about support of anti-loitering laws. He claims that “[communities] from Los Angeles to Washington, D.C.-have reacted [to gang violence] by passing a variety of innovative laws, which range from curfew measures to anti-loitering statutes…;” however, he does not support this claim with actual statistics. He expects the reader to accept these assertions as fact. This is a weakness because the reader is expected to trust the author’s information without any real evidence these progressive laws.

The author finally gives some statistics to support his generalizations in the fourth paragraph of his essay. By supporting his previous arguments with the facts that, “From 1993 to 1996, the murder rate dropped by 40 percent, robberies dropped by 30 percent, and burglary dropped by more than 25 percent…,” he shows the reader that his comments are not unfounded. Willard discusses the fact that during the time of these statistics the city of New York did not increase funding for la...

... middle of paper ...

...ective than Cole’s rant in “Anti-Loitering Laws Are Ineffective and Biased.” The reader is much less likely to get offended and stop reading an essay if its content is presented in a respectful manner.

These essays taught me the importance of tone to an essay. A disrespectful tone is likely to cause a reader to become upset and disinterested with an author’s work. It is extremely important that an author not only keep his essay focused and well supported, he must also pay special attention to his tone.

Works Cited

Cole, David. “Anti-Loitering Laws Are Ineffective and Biased.” Mosaics: Reading and Writing Essays. 5th ed. Ed. Kim Flachmann. Pearson Education, Inc., 2011. 426-428. Print.

Willard, Richard. “Anti-Loitering Laws Can Reduce Gang Violence.” Mosaics: Reading and Writing Essays. 5th ed. Ed. Kim Flachmann. Pearson Education, Inc., 2011. 423-425. Print.

Open Document