Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Zoos are beneficial for animals
Zoos are beneficial for animals
Roles of zoos in conservation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Zoos are beneficial for animals
Should animals be kept in zoos? “I am personally not against keeping animals at zoos, as they serve a huge educational purpose, but treating them well and with respect seems the least we could do, and with 'we' I mean not just zoo staff, but most certainly also the public.” Frans de Waal. Almost everyone has been to a zoo at least once in their life. Zoo are a good combination of being both educational and fun. However, when people see an animal just lying in the middle of their big empty cage, they start to wonder is this right? Should animals be kept in zoos? A lot of people think, no animals should not be kept in zoos, because it is inhumane to keep an animal locked up its whole life. Animals are supposed to be free, they should be able to live their life without walls keeping them in one place. In some cases it is inhumane to keep animals in cages. When the cages are too small or unkempt, then …show more content…
Animals should be kept in captivity because they live longer, the help educate people, and most zoo take care of them. Many zoo animals get depressed because they either get stressed out, or bored. However good zoos give animals breaks and they will sometimes play with the animals. Zoos take care of their animals, because people enjoy going to a zoo where animals are healthy and do not look miserable. Animals in captivity usually live longer because they always have enough food, there are no predators to eat them and vets will treat them if they get sick or hurt. Zoos are also education, they teach people more about animals, where they live and how taking care of the environment saves animals. The reason why most people believe that animals should not be in zoos, is because they went to a zoo that does not take care of their animals. Those zoos should have the animals taken out there. However not all zoos are like that, there are plenty of zoos that have large enclosures and will play with their
Considering the many challenges animals face in the wild, it is understandable that people may be eager to support zoos and may feel that they are protective facilities necessary for animal life. In the article “ Zoos Are Not Prisons. They Improve the Lives of Animals”, Author Robin Ganzert argues that Zoos are ethical institutions that enrich the lives of animals and ultimately protect them. Statistics have shown that animals held in captivity have limited utilitarian function resulting in cramped quarters, poor diets, depression, and early death for the animals thus, proving that Zoos are not ethical institutions that support and better the lives of animals as author Robin Ganzert stated (Cokal 491). Ganzert exposes the false premise in stating
Have you ever seen an animal sitting in a cage all alone with nothing to do. Well, zoos are trying to change that fact. They will allow the animals to live in an environment that is like their home. Many people don't realize this, but zoo are keeping and breeding these animals because they would not survive in the wild alone. In the three passages, ¨The Stripes Will Survive,¨ ¨The Zood Go Wild from No More Dodos,¨ ¨Our Beautiful Macaws and Why They Need Enrichment.¨ All of these articles present one claim, that is that the role of zoos is no longer to keep animal, but to protect them.
Keeping animals locked in cages, bored and cramped up in such a small space is an awful sight to show the children. It creates an image in the little minds of children that animals are to be treated like they don’t matter. They say Zoos are a place where children can learn about the wild, exotic animals, but in reality it doesn't teach them anything only that they are meant to be caged up, which is wrong. Also, it is really painful to see the animals bored and lonely, so why should people keep letting them do this to these beautiful creatures. Animal captivity for entertainment should end to let them go to their rightful home.
Lastly, many zoos have breeding programs which helps endangered species grow their population. In the wild some animals find it hard to find a mate and to successfully breed. At zoos they have professionals which make sure that the breeding goes successfully and that the baby grows into a strong and healthy adult. If you still don't believe that animals should be kept in zoos another option is an animal sanctuary where animals are able to run free but still have the care of a human if
On the other hand, animals kept in captivity not only have research done about them but it can also have a positive effect on their population. Being kept in captivity helps conserve the populations of endangered species. In a captive environment they are kept safe and away from harm. They can breed in captivity and keep the population growing. SeaWorld has bred many Orca Whales in captivity and hasn’t taken any out of the ocean in 35 years (Raja).
Do you think animals should be put into zoos? Well they shouldn't, because they are put into misery and they also suffer in their cages.
Zoo captivity is substandard and inadequate for animals. Zoo animals are deprived of their right as animals they are treated unjustly and unfairly. Animals should not be forced to kept in a cage away from their natural environment and be used as a form of entertainment to humans. The animals also suffer from stress and are driven insane by being trapped behind bars. The zoo is supposed to provide safety to these endangered animals but instead, these zoo animals are put at risk towards a variety of dangers such as vulnerability to diseases and starvation.
Animal rights have become a very serious issue here in the United States over the last few decades. One issue that has been discussed is whether or not zoos serve a good purpose or are they just a torture chamber for the animals. Locked up in small cages so people can yell at them and stare. Or are zoos the key to save our species in an ever growing human population. Rachel Lu, a philosophy teacher and senior columnist, writes the article, “Let’s Keep Zoos: Learning stewardship is a good thing.”, published April 18, 2014, argues that zoos are worth keeping. Rachel Lu uses her personal experiences to appeal to her audience that zoos are valuable to people especially young children because it gives them a perspective on nature.
Zoos all over the world are keeping animals in environments that mimic their natural habitat. In the article “Should we have zoos?” by Shayna Orens, Zoos around the world are to help adults, animals, and kids. Zoos not only keep animals, but they also rescue animals.This means zoos are beneficial because Zoos take care and rescue animals for educational purposes Zoos also have many different programs like education for kids.
Also an animal's wild habitat wins out over captivity. Finally, zoos are teaching kids that it is perfectly fine to lock up animals for our gratification. My first reason for animals to be let out of zoos is, animals held captive in zoos often die very young. According to the article by Captive Animals Protection Society [CAPS] states the following,"40% of lion cubs die before one month of age, in the wild only 30% of cubs are thought to die before they are six months old.
For example, they have been physically and mentally destroyed. That is bad because they could die in the cages. This is also bad because they could not forget important things like to eat and not to hurt the zookeepers. This shows that they do not like the cages and could die from being in the cages too long. Also, some animals bite at the bars on the cages or pound on the glass because they are unhappy from being in cages too long. That is bad because they could they could break their teeth or their beak and not be able to eat so they could die from starvation. Also, a gorilla could run and pound on the glass and break it, they could escape the cage, he could hurt people and run out of the zoo and out onto the streets. This all shows that animals do not like the cages and zoos should be
Today, zoos often receive a lot of criticism for merely displaying wild animals for pure entertainment reasons, and without a conservation or protection purpose. Both zoos and aquariums have often been criticized for being unethical, and the premise of captivity is said to be detrimental to the cause of conservation (Maple 5).
Zoos are an unsuitable environment for wild animals and should, therefore, be abolished. Firstly, zoo animals are kept in a very confined area compared to their vast natural habitat. Secondly, breeding programmes are far less successful than zoos claim. Thirdly, zoo animals are exposed to many diseases and other dangers. Zoo animals are usually kept in very cramped enclosures and do not behave like their wild counterparts.
... danger too. A good reason for captivity is rehabilitation for an animal that is hurt or wounded and could be treated. Then having a second chance back out into the wild. Also by keeping endangered species from going completely instinct by figuring out genetics of an animal. So having zoos and farms do help animals but does put them at risk.
There has been a long-standing debate surrounding the nature of zoological parks. In recent years, the concern over the health and safety of animals in captivity has grown significantly. This is due, in part, to the rise in attention people have started paying towards the way these animals are treated and held captive within zoological parks. On the news, more cases pop up yearly involving animals that have been abused, neglected, and even killed. Furthermore, animal rights groups have become larger in numbers and more outspoken regarding the problematic existence of zoos. Though despite these facts, there has not been a decline in the amount of people visiting zoos, the economic revenue is as strong as ever, and the establishments are still