Tycho Brahe And Copernicus: The Scientific Revolution

1047 Words3 Pages

The Scientific Revolution was a turning point in human history. Men no longer viewed the cosmos as a finite structure with the outer most layer as heaven. The purpose of life that had been instated for hundreds of years suddenly was flipped over. Challenging the pre-existing authority has already happened with the Protestant Reformation, but became a normal occurrence in human history with the development of science.
Prior to the Renaissance, it was believed that we were living in a geocentric universe. From the time of Aristotle, it was mistakenly believed that the Earth was at the center of the universe and that celestial bodies such as the sun, moon, and stars, were fixed and divine. Claudius Ptolemy hypothesized that the physical universe …show more content…

In his book, On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres (1543), Copernicus theorized that a heliocentric (sun centered) model would explain planetary movements. Despite Copernicus’ radical view on the universe, he remained fairly conservative on the beliefs that there are nine crystalline spheres. Tycho Brahe, a Danish nobleman, was the first person to generate massive amounts of data on the outside world. He espoused geocentrism but collected massive amounts of data. Brahe’s assistant Johannes Kepler used his data to prove his three laws of planetary movement. More specifically, Kepler proved that the movement of the planets were elliptical. Galileo Galilei used the Dutch invention of the telescope and made many improvements on it. He used his improved telescope to discover that there are mountains on the moon, multiple moons in Jupiter’s orbit and that the Sun has spots. These were astonishing discoveries at that time! Upon discovering these realities, Galileo proved that celestial bodies were made up of matter like the Earth, and not simply divine energy or crystalline spheres. This declined the prior spiritual belief held by religious followers and replaced their view of the universe with a purely materialistic view. He also argued that mathematical laws could prove planetary motion. When Galileo went public with his findings, the Catholic Church said that he was correct, but that he …show more content…

At the time, England would be the producer of the best clocks, telescopes and microscopes. With these precise instruments, Newton would develop his Laws of Motion. In his book, Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy (1648-1686), Newton would discuss his findings about gravity. All objects are attracted to one another by gravity. This could be used to explain both terrestrial and celestial movements. Isaac Newton invented Calculus to explain gravity and physics. Using his formula, he discovered that planets did not orbit the sun circularly, but elliptically. Through his discoveries, Newton proved that the secrets of the natural world could be known through observation. Newton is known for his mechanistic cosmology. He attributed the creation of the cosmos to God, but God would only come back when the machine was broken. Isaac Newton believed in empiricism, which means that one must observe something before attempting to explain it.
A woman’s role during the Scientific Revolution remained static. Traditionally, women were not intellectuals, but exercised some influence over princely courts where Galileo would seek support. Through the support of their husbands, two women were able to contribute to the scientific revolution. Margaret Cavendish was well schooled and was able to sit in on a meeting of the Royal Society of London. In some cases, women became assistants to their

Open Document