The Importance Of Freedom Of Speech

908 Words2 Pages

Freedom is the idea that founded the greatest country to exist: The United States of America. This principle has guided the way for other countries to create and share their own freedoms and constitutions. Within America, the Bill of Rights might be the most important document for any citizens to walk within the borders. On that document, the understanding of freedom to believe, speak, press, and assemble hold the highest value. In the modern context, freedom of speech is under fire. Examples raging from all corners of the country: Donald Trump’s word choice, cartoon drawings of Muhammad, comedians, and many more. One question that comes from this issue is its place in mass media; specifically the freedom of speech. Before diving into the …show more content…

This is an ethical issue that cannot be backed by numbers and research. The intention of this amendment in 1789 was to increase the follow of ideas, news, and freedoms whether they are popular or not. Today, social media are trying to censor certain topics like national terrorism, neo-Nazi propaganda, and other very selective martial. Freedom of speech is very hard to understand because it can be very nasty. Again, these radical ideas are considered hate speech and this not being supportive of them, although, it should be the job of the public or culture to censor themselves. Giving that power to mass media will create a wave of criticism, backlash, and hypocritical behaviors. For example, reporter Nazz Napworth of the Christian post explains “the Associated Press removed a photo of an art piece called "Piss Christ" from its website Wednesday after a journalist pointed out the company 's double standard. AP has refused to publish the Charlie Hebdo cartoons mocking Muhammad that led to Hebdo 's murder due to its policy of not publishing "deliberately provocative images." This begins the slippery slope and New York Times editor Rafael O. Gomez, illustrates that idea by stating, “Freedom of speech is a critical stitch in the fabric of democracy. The monitoring and restriction of even violent content can have dire consequences, despite being well-intentioned. Who decides what is

Open Document