Imagine a time when one could be fined,
imprisoned and even killed for simply speaking
one’s mind. Speech is the basic vehicle for
communication of beliefs, thoughts and ideas.
Without the right to speak one’s mind freely one
would be forced to agree with everything society
stated. With freedom of speech one’s own ideas can
be expressed freely and the follower’s belief will
be stronger. The words sound so simple, but
without them the world would be a very different
place. Without the right to speak freely one would
not be able to debt, nor would one be able to
receive full coverage on world issues. There would
be no interesting newspapers, no free religion and
no free thoughts. This amendment seems so simple
but, the boundaries of which issues and incidents
are covered are so complex and varied. What is
legal and illegal? What can be said and cannot be
said? Does this amendment include spoken word only
or does it include action also? What, if any,
limits should be put to this amendment?
As long as the government has existed, people
have battled over censorship. Censorship takes on
all different shapes and forms: banning of books,
television guidelines, laws that curb specific
types of speech, and imprisonment or even death for
openly speaking. For example, in sixteenth century
England, a loyal subject of Henry VII was
imprisoned for saying, “I like not the proceedings
of this realm.”1 In earlier times this would have
been punishable by death for treason.
The need for freedom of speech was first
brought up in Massachusetts Body of Liberties in
1641. After the Revolutionary War in America, many
states recommend that free speech be put in the
United States Constitution. Nevertheless, freedom
of speech was written into the Bill of Rights and
was ratified in 1791.
A few years after the First Amendment was
ratified, the government passed the Sedition Act of
1798. This was to help prevent resistance or
rebellion against the government. It also made it
illegal to print, write or say “any false,
scandalous and malicious” things against the
government. One person was convicted under the act
for ridiculous pomp, foolish adulation, and selfish
avarice.”2
This was never challenged by the
Democratic-Republicans because of the
Federalist-dominated the court rule. The act
eventually ended the Federalists in 1800 an...
... middle of paper ...
.... Or
is it? Should people be able to choose for
themselves? Oliver Wendell Holmes said:
Words can be weapons...the
question in every case is
whether the words are used in
such circumstances and are of
such a nature as to create a
clear and present danger that
they will bring about the
substantive evils that Congress
has a right to prevent.8
The basic idea on the Freedom of Speech is
counteract whatever one says or does. With the
Nazi march in 1977, instead of protesting, have an
anti- Nazi march. The most vulnerable people will
pave the road for the speech laws. Ku Klux Klan
marches are protected as well as civil rights, Gay
and Lesbian marches.
There are many ways to interpret the First
Amendment, but as long as one used good sense and
can justify ones’ actions then there would be
fewer conflicts. Protest and fight back only when
necessary and not when someone offends someone for
petty little criticisms. Use common sense and
remember the harder one makes it on another, it
makes it just as hard for oneself. As proven over
and over History does repeat and the heated debt on
the boundaries of this amendment will continue
until the end of time.
One key to the first amendment of the United states constitution is the right to free speech. Freedom of speech is what separates America than other countries around the world that forbid freedom of speech rights. Freedom of speech has been in our constitution since the year 1791. When James Madison “the father of the constitution” wrote the bill of rights he saw potential and that it would make the country more freedom filled than other countries. The land of the free is what the United States is nicknamed and it 's because of our rights to express ourselves as freely as we desire.
Peter the Great would come to be one of Russia’s most influential and powerful rulers by implementing easily the greatest amount of reforms a Russian ruler has ever attempted and altering the course of Roman history for good. The Tsar’s many reforms brought Russia out of archaic times and into a more Europeanized modern age where not only was the entire structure of government changed but so too were extensive reforms brought onto late 17th century and early 18th century Russia’s industry, commerce, technology, military, and culture among other things. Peter the Great’s legacy brought Russia to the height of her power and is one that has inspired many Russians and historians alike through the centuries since his death.
Catherine II was a woman of many talents and abilities, which were used during her thirty years of ruling over Russia. During her reign, she was able to accomplish much. Catherine’s goal was to modernize Russia and bring it out of the medieval slump that it had been suffering from. She believed that it could and would become one of the great powers in the world. Before her noble ambitions could be achieved, would first need to become Czarina. This task would prove to be difficult for her and would require a large amount of political skill and wit to achieve. Several obstacles arose that tested her ability to navigate the dangerous political waters. The first was her lack of connection to the throne. She was a German princess, who at the time was not a member of the Russian Orthodox Church, and was plucked from an obscure royal family from an even more obscure branch of that family. She was picked by Elizabeth to be the wife of the future Czar, Peter III. He would become one of the first obstacles in her
The network is unbiased and focuses on making sure all research is done and the plan is well thought-out. In this assignment I am going to find a way we should have purposed this conflict to management and administration versus the way we
There are many theories and perspectives that go into the social work practice, many of which are used depending on the situation at hand. These theories along with views of systems help social workers better understand and work with their clients, as well as, work at an ecological approach to use interchangeably between different types of practice.
In the 34 years of her rule, Catherine accomplished necessary tasks to improve the nation for its prosperity and for the development of her people. However, her place as a female ruler overturning the nation this drastically led to divisiveness regarding her actions while in power. Those who looked up to her were compelled to keep her deserved name alive and well, a mere exchange with the empress said to leave an impression on her subjects (Dixon 649-653). Moreover, the Nakaz not only revised and improved numerous aspects of Russian life and politics, but it was often seen as a symbol of what Catherine’s time on the throne meant—a representation of her autocracy (Dixon 670). On the other hand, the criticisms centering around Catherine’s rule brought up exactly how much she had changed in Russia, and certain reforms, such as the judiciary’s alterations, were a result of acute feminization influencing how the nation would be operated (Dixon 678). Although these praises and criticisms are justifiable, the impact Catherine the Great had on Russia is inarguable. Her application of western thought on a nation that remained isolated from the advancements of its European neighbors set Russia on a path to become one of the great powers of the world. In short, Catherine the Great was the face of Russian modernization, and it is this accomplishment that empowers her reputation long after her time as empress has
et al (2014). The Role of Theories in Social Work Practice. Applied theory to Generalist Social Work Practice. Somerset: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Retrieved from:
In order to successfully achieve in addressing the issues that affect the community or the world social workers have to know what it means to work on a macro-level practice. This type of practice is working on our larger level. Instead of having that one-on-one clinical social work with a client these type of social worker addresses their client’s issues by working on the policies and making changes that need to be done for the benefit of their clients. In other words, macro social worker usually works in an organization that engaged in changing policies for the benefit of the community or for the benefit of that organization’s clients as a whole. For instance, an example of this type of practice is the program coordinator for the mental health in my field, Edison Job Corps. The program coordinator ultimately made the decisions on what is needed and not needed for the clients on the center. In order to be a successful macro social worker, there is a need to be a
Generalist social work practice informs professional identity and behaviors by realizing that social work promotes social change to an exposed environment, such as helping individuals, and groups. Social workers view behaviors in a social environment and use research to identify the client’s basic needs such as food, water, and shelter. Generalist social work practice provides the resources that may improve so the client’s wellbeing. This practice of social work can plan accordingly through problem-solving as well as being able to recognize the certain levels of diversity in family, background, environment, neighborhood, friends, social media, and religion. Social workers can provide a variety of services to their client’s necessities.
Similar to the last approach, generalist practice approach believe that all social workers should have a bases in all practices of social work. Influences by social systems theory, this approach believes that every social worker should be flexible and versatile because client’s problems are complex and affects the client in more way than one (Sheafor et al., 2012, p. 43). Also had two fundamental compounds that all social workers, according to this approach, should have the knowledge in all practices to help their clients efficiently and rather than pulling clients into methods, make the method about the client. Secondly, understand the person-environment relationship and be able to intervene in more than one system (Sheafor et al., 2012, p. 44).
Many things can influence a social workers’ practice, for better or worse. Familiarity, classwork, personal experience, and types of internships can all influence the way in which a counselor views their work. These experiences also help shape our choices regarding practice theory. The various theories that social workers employ are influenced by other professions such as: medicine, psychology, sociology, and even economics (Green & McDermott, 2010). It is not necessarily what theory is chosen, but that a practitioner makes a choice to follow the general tenets of a theory and lets it inform their work. By grounding their practice in theory, social workers can better understand the work at hand, carefully consider goal setting, and anticipate
Freedom of speech has many positive things, one of which is the help it gives on decision-making. Thanks to freedom of speech it is possible to express personal ideas without fear or restraints; therefore, all the perspectives and options will be on the table, giving people more opportunities to choose from. Nevertheless, everything in life has a limit, and the limit of freedom of speech depends directly on the consideration of the rights of others. People is free of believing what they want, thinking what they want, and even saying what they want, everything as long as they do not intrude or violate anyone else's rights. Under certain circumstances freedom of speech should be limited, and this is more than just a political action, this acts represent the urge for tolerance and the need for respect.
Furthermore, advocates of the General Systems theory believe that it should be used as a universal model for all social work practice. They believe that by applying General systems theory to social work practice individuals and social systems are more easily explained and viewed as being holon (Carter, 2011). System’s theories also encourages, “…the refinement of social work’s person-in-environment perspective by embedding it within a comprehensive, multidisciplinary, and holistic conceptual framework” (Robbins et al., 2006, p. 50). Thus, the General Systems theory helps explain human
As a social worker, when assessing clients it is important to look at how social systems directly impact every aspect of their ecosystem. This can be done by looking at every level. According to Turner (1974), there are two major levels to observe, which includes micro and macro. These levels of social work practice overlay and affect each other, so it is important to understand how each level directly impacts a person. While assessing an individual’s environment the information assessed includes family structure, boundaries, roles changes and environmental supports. An individual’s environment is always changing and because of this, every aspect of the ecosystem can change. This paper will look at how completing an MSW program impacts my ecosystem at a micro and macro level.
To practice social work, it is important to understand what the field of social work actually is. Although it seems easy to define, social work is a widespread profession that reaches many more areas than most realize. It can range from working for individuals, to all of society. The use of theories in social work is a large part of understanding and carrying out practice. Systems theory is a widely known theory used in social work, but brings debate upon whether it should be the main theory used in social work practice or not.