The Big Stage!
April Wright
JOSEPH PIONKE
CRJ320 Criminal Investigation
May 25, 2016
The prosecutor and criminal investigator square measure 2 cogs that have to work along to achieve success in making an attempt a criminal case. The prosecutor should swear upon the investigator to tell them of all aspects of the case that they designed, and the investigator must accept the functionary to achieve justice for the victim, their family, and the community. Any criminal trial is an adversarial match between the functionary and the defense and facets either side can use all the data on the market to them to induce a win for his or her side.
The final report plays a really important role for the official once it involves the prosecution of the
…show more content…
The first stage is that the inquiring stage, and this is the initial stage where proof is being collected and knowledge provided to investigators is being looked into. The next stage is that the charging stage. This stage works towards building a successfully litigated action in the public prosecuting officer is deciding if investigators have enough proof to convict either by victimization the jury system or by the prosecutor. The next stage is that the discovery and motion stage. This stage works towards building a successfully litigated action by each sides sharing proof and therefore the defense filing motions. According to Hess and Orthmann (2012), “The pretrial discovery process needs the prosecution and defense to disclose to one another bound proof they will use at trial, thus avoiding surprises” (p. 657). This information would be useful to the attorney in that they'll refute the proof conferred by the defense. Also, the motions may suppress proof, and the prosecutor could rethink their strategy on the case if key proof is also impermissible. The last stage is the trial stage. This may end in the attorney going forward with a jury trial, the person admitting guilt, the person accepting a plea cut price or a bench trial. The previous steps will facilitate the attorney …show more content…
That could definitely be the case in some things. The acquittal might have been reached as a result of the choose or jury believed that there wasn't enough solid proof to guide to the conviction of the person as a result of they still had cheap doubts concerning the guilt of the individual involved the crime. This could mean that there was some negligence on the part of the investigator therein they failed to notice enough proof realize that confidence on the far side an affordable doubt within the minds of the choose or jury. However, in some cases there may not be an ample quantity of proof out there for assortment, witnesses may not have stepped forward, or other circumstances tied their hands. There might have been enough for grounds once it came time to arrest a suspect, but not enough to prove guilt on the far side a cheap
From a trial strategy point of view, you always start with the piece(s) of evidence you believe are most damaging to the client's case and work backwards looking for an exploitable flaw in the search and seizure procedure that would make that or those item(s) inadmissible. The further back in the series of events you can argue a fatal flaw, the more likely that the evidence and any additional materials which flowed from that particular item of evidence will be excluded. This is the practical analysis of all the times we see or hear of law enforcement arguing that there was some technical item which drew their attention and suspicion and justifies their hunch that criminal activity is afoot.
One contradiction in the job of the prosecutor is that they have nearly limitless direction in critical matters; however, prosecutors’ are also held to a very high ethical standard. Prosecutors must screen cases to determine which ones need to be prosecuted; nevertheless, this is the source of controversy with most people. “What makes charging decisions more intriguing and controversial is the fact that in making this decision, the prosecutor has nearly limitless discretion” (Hemmens, Brody, & Spohn, 2013). This means the prosecutor’s charging decisions are beyond any judicial review, so it must be apparent that a prosecutor
Amongst the responsibilities of the prosecutor is the ability to decide how to bring the charges, such as, joinder of charges or joinder of parties. I will be discussing the choices that prosecutors must make when prosecuting a crime (Whitebread & Slogobin, 2000). Sometimes the prosecutor will make the decision to forego prosecution. This could be done through a plea bargain or through dismissal of the charges. Plea bargains are agreements between the defendant and the prosecution, where the defendant agrees to plead guilty in exchange for a lesser sentence.
The officers tampered with evidence and made a false discovery that he was the person and that is how he was convicted (Innocent Project N.D.). Many forensic methods have been implemented in research when looking for evidence, but the methods that are not scientific and have little or nothing to do with science. The result of false evidence by other means leads to false testimony by a forensic analyst. Another issue with forensic errors is that it is a challenge to find a defense expert (Giannelli, 2011).
In closing, the criminal trial process has been able to reflect the morals and ethics of society to a great extent, despite the few limitations, which hinder its effectiveness. The moral and ethical standards have been effectively been reflected to a great extent in the areas of the adversary system, the system of appeals, legal aid and the jury
I wanted to look at the investigative and criminal procedures following the arrest of an alleged criminal and the powerful effects via testimonies and evidence (or lack thereof) it can have on a case.There is an importance of the courts in regards to crime that can’t be over looked. The primary function of the criminal justice system is to uphold the established laws, which define what we understand as deviant in this society.
The Methods of Discovery is when both parties present all the evidence that they have. Both parties have the right to interview all witnesses of all the ...
Police, courts, and corrections are separated government institutions with different goals, histories, and operating procedures. Law enforcement officials report crimes that happen in their area. Officers investigate crimes and gather evidence to identify and use against a presumed perpetrator. Thus, it is the duty of the officer to uphold the rights of offenders, victims, and to conduct police procedures within rules set by law. Depending on the nature of the crime and the evidence gathered it is up to the police discretion to make an arrest or issue a citation for the accused to appear in court. The law enforcement has responsibilities that no other component does, thus an officer does not decide the defendant’s conviction; the jury does (Neubauer and Fradella,
Crime Scene Investigation For my assignment, I will be looking into the case of James Bulger, aged 2 years old, who was kidnapped and murdered by John Venables and Robert Thompson on February 12th 1993. Through evidence found at the crime scene and testimonial statements, the police saw that the two boys, ages 11, abducted James from Bootle Strand Shopping Center, Liverpool. They took him on a long, aimless walk where they brutally attacked him and left him for dead. In my assignment I will show how work done by the police, forensic scientists and Investigators helped to convict Jon and Robert.
· What does criminal investigation mean to you? · Why are criminal investigations important? · What purpose do they serve? · Finally, apply at least 1 biblical passage to the concept or practice of criminal investigation. · Explain why you picked the passage and what it means to you.
Assemble a set of guidelines for conducting preliminary investigations in a criminal case. When there is a criminal case, there are a set of guidelines a criminal investigator should follow when conducting a preliminary inquiry. These guidelines consist of arriving at a crime scene in a timely manner, just in case the suspect may still be at or near the scene (Hess, K.M. & Orthmann, C.H., 2013). They will need to take care of any injured person or people that may need emergency care. Check to see if there are any witnesses who have seen what happened.
Criminal investigators are professionals in the law enforcement team who try to solve crimes, prevent the occurrence of future crimes, and searching and detaining suspects. The two categories of criminal investigators are private and public criminal investigators. The level of training that these professionals go through is different which leads us to the differences between public and private criminal investigations.
To begin with lets start off with what an investigation is, an investigation is “An investigation is the process of planning and conducting appropriate lines of inquiry to obtain the evidence required to objectively determine the factual basis of allegations.” According to the United Nations Development Programme Office of Audit and Investigations. And a Preliminary investigation is limited scope inquiry undertaken to verify whether an allegation merits a full investigation. As a first responder on a scene he will conduct a preliminary investigation that will in the end help solve the crime. The officer needs to take note of all things and question witness, victims and even possible suspects.
The criminal investigation process is able to achieve justice to a great to a great extent. They are effective in achieving justice, as they are able to balance the rights of the victim, offenders and society and also provide fair and just outcomes. For these reasons, the criminal investigation process is largely able to achieve justice.
Today, technology has affected our global surroundings in a number of ways. Technology has created a more advanced society and economy. We use technology in every aspect of life today. New innovations and technology helps create a safer atmosphere and reduces the rate of crime. Technology is the usage and knowledge of techniques or is systems of these things. Usage of technology in the criminal justice system is not new but more apparent today. Technology in criminal justice will continue to challenge us to think about how we turn information into knowledge. Due to new technology, criminal investigations are able to maintain and improve their processes. Forensic science, DNA, other and future technology has all had a tremendous impact on criminal investigation and its process.