Similarities Between Frankenstein And Middlesex

1080 Words3 Pages

What exactly is a monster? Frankenstein and Middlesex both have similar concepts of having a “monster” in their story. The authors of these stories are both from completely different eras. You have Mary Shelley writing her story in the United Kingdom, in 1818, then having Jeffery Eugenides writing his story in the United States, in 2002. Very unusual eras and locations for these stories to be written. A monster is consistently looked at differently and relevant to where they each belong in their time period. Of course the setup for these novels are different, but the main concept in book is having a “monster” casted out into each of their novels as their topic, a story about a “monster”. They both cast around a story that is made around their …show more content…

Again, from the different eras the authors wrote in, gave more complete outlooks how to represent their “monster”. The authors both write in a brilliant format where they both write incredibly. Shelley's monster contains more of a evil perspective. Early 1800’s rarely allowed a different kind to be allowed around specific type of people, such as not being around white people. Eventually, Victor Frankenstein comes up with a idea bringing deceased back to the living world. A different thing created from the context of Victor and put into this world where being “different” is not allowed. Time continues, Eugenides writes his novel with a character of no gender. More maturity risen from the 1800’s greatly. Not exactly a evil outlook from this context, but more of a different circumstance. A human is acceptable for definition of Eugenides “monster”, but then again what do you call Cal in Middlesex? A monster? Maybe, maybe not. Eugenides gives off a non-normal subject. You have a monster. A “someone” or “something” that is not exactly human or even considered a person. What is determined from our mindsets is what sets the many …show more content…

Many reasons to have this creature be named a monster from Shelley’s writing. Victor creates this thing from scratch. A thing to fade away the fear Victor receives all throughout himself. Creating a version himself goes to the complete opposite direction. A version of himself and the creature he creates is labeled as the monster? What about Vicor, if “himself” is this creature is the monster, should he maybe be considered the monster? Victor explains deeply, “ I am alone and miserable: man will not associate with me; but one as deformed and horrible as myself would not deny herself to me. My companion must be of the same species and have the same defects. This being you must create.”(Shelley, 103). Victor is lonely, and wants the companion that is exactly like himself. The dream comes true of a creature being born. Victors shame and prudence brought this “monster” into the world. Shelley clearly defines the feelings Victor appeals from the monster throughout the novel. The mistakes that were made. The trouble that was costed. Victor having to live in this society where he did something wrong, having to deal with what he had did. Frankenstein’s monster learned; growing up in London during this faded era, learning from person to person. Learning the wrong ways can come into effect when learning about what life consist of. Frankenstein’s monster is created out of fear and disbelief. Which then is created with wrong

Open Document