Similarities Between Genesis And Frankenstein

1260 Words3 Pages

Link between Genesis and Frankenstein.

It should be first noted that Frankenstein almost directly references itself to Genesis, via Paradise Lost. The monster compares himself to Adam and Satan. "Like Adam, I [...] Satan as the fitter emblem of my condition" (Frankenstein, Ch15, pg94) And Victor was like god, as the monster's creator. However, Victor acts as a foil to god, treating his creation differently. While god "blessed" his creations (Genesis 1:28), Victor abandons his monster immediately after creation, referring to it as a "demoniacal corpse" (Frankenstein, Ch5, pg36). These set up the comparison between Genesis and Frankenstein.

Both books raise questions of the characteristics of creation, of Nature and Nurture. Frankenstein appears …show more content…

Part of the reason why Eve ate the fruit of knowledge was because "tree was to be desired to make one wise", so that humans "will be like God". Before any knowledge of morality, humans already had the desire to be great like god (the sin of pride). And throughout Genesis, humans naturally became sinful and evil even with divine intervention. (Genesis 4:24, 6:5, 18:20) Also, it is a character flaw of humans to be superficial, such as when "they knew that they were naked" and tried to hide their nakedness (Genesis 3:7-10). This idea is supported by Frankenstein where Victor abandoned his monster (Frankenstein, Ch5, pg35) and even the outcast De Lacey family beat the monster upon seeing him (Frankenstein, Ch15, pg99). Only the blind man who could not see the monster's horrid appearance showed the monster kindness (Frankenstein, Ch15, pg97-98). Here, it appears Genesis supports that human Nature tends toward evil.

In god's Nurture, god selected blameless people like Noah (Genesis 6:8-9) and Abraham (Genesis 17:1-8) to bless. In later parts, people became fearing of god and treated Abraham (Genesis 20:8-16) and Isaac (Genesis 26:28-29), whom god blessed, with deference. This showed the effect of nurture by god, seemingly supporting Nurture winning over Nature like in …show more content…

Even with punishments such as the flood, humans still sinned. (Genesis 4:24, 6:5, 18:20) Superficially, it appears to support Nature winning over Nurture. On the other hand, if we do not assume that God is entirely perfect (1), God was maybe too tolerant or inconsistent in his punishments, resulting in nurturing the wrong values. God protected Cain after killing Abel (Genesis 4:15), which resulted in Lamech considering himself right for killing 2 people and that he should be protected even more than Cain (Genesis 4:23-24). And god did not stop this, nor did he tell Lamech that this was wrong. Thus, god's inaction seems to reinforce that murder might be a good thing. As a result, the nurture of implicitly allowing murder was what contributed to the sin of humans. This implies that Nurture may actually be stronger than

Open Document