Similarities Between Federalist And Anti-Federalists

652 Words2 Pages

Federalists versus Anti-Federalists Debate Federalists versus Anti-Federalists was a widespread controversial debate after the drafting of the Constitution from 1787 to 1789. The drafting of the Constitution was designed to resolve the problems and weaknesses that the Articles of Confederation started. The country needed a new government to be established. The Constitution required ratification from nine out of the thirteen colonies before it could fully go into effect. The push for ratification caused a great amount of controversy and a split of groups known as the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. This debate played a huge role in the shaping of the culture, economic, political, and social structure at that time. The main argument from the Federalists point of view was that they were for the ratification of the Constitution and wanted a strong federal government. Federalists were led by Alexander Hamilton and they believed that it was necessary to have a strong government to establish an organized country. They were the first …show more content…

They believed in strong state government and that a Bill of Rights was necessary to offer basic liberties to the public. They believed that power wasn’t distributed equally among the three branches of government, and feared the authority of the federal government. The Anti-Federalist Papers argued that the Constitution would take away rights and freedoms that the American Revolution won. Some differences between the two were over individual rights. Federalists were more concerned with promoting the common good of everyone, while the Anti-Federalists were concerned with protecting the rights of individuals and states. Although each political party has many differences, they both had one thing in common, they both wanted the best for the

Open Document