Pros And Disadvantages Of Sweatshops

932 Words2 Pages

Where were your shoes produced? What do you think about sweatshops? I live in the United State where most of the things are not produced locally nowadays. Even though the famous known brand Apple is designed in California, but produced in China. Do you think that they produced from a sweatshop? In today’s world, Multinational Corporation is important which can benefit both developed country and developing country. The developed countries can make more profits by reduce labor and resources cost, and also developing countries can get more job opportunities in order to improve to a better lifestyle. “My point is that bad as sweatshops are, the alternatives are worse. They are more dangerous, lower paying and more degrading. And when I struggle to think how we can really make a big difference in the development of the poorest countries, the key always seems to be manufacturing.” People argue that whether the multinational factories benefit the developing countries or not, how to help the poor countries. Although multinational factories in developing countries are sometimes overweight the cost that workers work in a unsafe-working condition, people from developing countries still prefer to work in a factory because they can have better benefits than working outside.
Working in a “sweatshop” can lead the workers in dangers because they are working in a unsafe-working condition. Sweatshops have been constructed many buildings illegally without permit in order to make some more profits. However, it will bring some safety problems if the building has been built illegally which can get hurt or even get killed from an emergency. For example, according to Manik and Yardley’s article “Building Collapse in Bangladesh Leaves Scores Dea...

... middle of paper ...

... multinationals.
In conclusion, the example I provide have been proved that actually the multinationals are benefit the developing countries even thought they have something not too good, but in the long run, the developing countries will getting stronger. Sweatshops are actually better than alternative for developing countries, which can only work in the fields. Therefore, they want to work in a “sweatshop” instead of farming because of getting more money and working indoor. It also puts them in a higher-level lifestyle since they can earn morn money. “Sweatshops” are doing something to help the developing countries because they are providing jobs that pay better than other opportunities, and they are building economic development that has the potential to offer better living supplies. Do you still think “sweatshop” is bad, inhumane for developing countries?

Open Document