Innovator's Dilemma Analysis

813 Words2 Pages

The author describes the innovator's dilemma as the conflict arises between old and new innovations. Essentially, people develop innovations, nurture them and bring them to market. Then, they defend these innovations. The innovator's dilemma is to determine at what point a new innovation is truly innovative and game-changing and at what point the old innovation is the better option.
Innovation reflects the unknown. A new innovation is one that is unproven, and there is always going to be a degree of risk aversion that drives people to prefer existing technologies and ideas over new ones. This risk aversion lies at the heart of the innovator's dilemma. The author describes it as being based on emotional and psychological responses. In some cases, there may be ego involved for one who is involved in the old innovation – when AltaVista and Yahoo rejected Google's ideas they may not have realized it, but they were defending their own innovations. However, such a response led them to make the wrong move, and today Yahoo is struggling and if AltaVista still exists nobody is aware of that. As a result of this phenomenon, innovators are seldom able to sustain innovation. They instead find that their interests change, and with these changes comes the pursuit of refining or defending their old innovations. It can be difficult to let those old works go and pursue something new and better. Yet innovation is essentially a reflection of creative destruction. The old innovation might still be useful but if there is a better innovation available, it will win the day eventually. The best in business recognize the value of innovation, even when that innovation threatens their own personal legacy.
2. There is a myth of the lone invent...

... middle of paper ...

...a fountain of good, useful ideas, but good ideas are not at all uncommon.
The point that the chapter makes is that most good ideas are rejected by our internal filters. The ideas never go anywhere, but there are a lot of good ideas in each person. The trick is to recognize the best of these ideas and then to pursue them. For an invention to have an impact on humanity, it often requires determined pursuit of that idea as something that can be applied to other humans. We usually do not treat our ideas in this way, but instead we tend to be nonchalant about our ideas and let them slide into the ether. Good ideas do not always look like good ideas – so they are rejected. The reality is that it can be tough to judge off hand how good an idea is, but there are a lot of good ideas and if we pay more attention to them, we might find that innovation flows more freely.

Open Document