Hiroshima Bombing Dbq

889 Words2 Pages

The bombing of Hiroshima was in no way justifiable. I understand that Hiroshima was an important industrial city, creating weapons for the military but why would there be a need for a bomb when there was a request for negotiation to end the war?
The explosion destroyed 90% of the city killing 80,000 people and then later on tens of thousands died of radiation.(4) Japan did say they would fight to the end in the Pacific but there were clear signs before the bombing that demonstrated they had little chance of winning.(4) Japan’s military was weak, by June of 1945, their navy was not strong and their air force had been almost destroyed.(5) Also before the bomb was dropped American warplanes spread around the country, and US bombers left a trail of devastation. 300 American bombers attacked Tokyo, killing 100,000 people, dropping almost 1,700 tons of bombs and then later on May 23 520 giant B-29 bombers dropped 4,500 tons of bombs on the Japanese capital.(5) Then two days later on May 25th the second strike of 502 B-29 dropped 4,000 tons of explosives together this would destroy 56 square miles of the Japanese capital.(5) Now, this was before …show more content…

Dropping a bomb on an urban area would really show the effect of there new creation, basically that's what they were going for. Although many say that the bombing was justifiable because it would end the war quickly and would save many people. Really the bomb wasn't meant to hit a city with industrial military warfare but just the city itself because its population.(3) The bombing of Hiroshima was not right and there is nothing that can make it justifiable because it killed thousands of innocent people not a military base. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was a way that the United States could show off their new weapon and demonstrate that they were a powerful

Open Document