Analysis Of The Wife Beater

1004 Words3 Pages

In “The Wife Beater” by Gayle Rosenwald Smith, the author uses the history of the long, cotton tank top that is often referred to as a “wife-beater” to address the issues of domestic violence. Before the story begins, there is some background information that addresses a company which sells wife-beaters online. The website is designed to show some derogatory images on the homepage of the website and the owners of the website give those convicted of domestic violence a discount on their purchase (Kirszner and Mandell 516). In Smith’s story, she explains the history of the wife beater along with the different reasons for its popularity. According to Smith, “the World Book Dictionary” locates the origin of the term wife-beater in the 1970s, from …show more content…

The author shows a sign of worry that individuals under the age of 25 do not seem to care about the topic of domestic violence and “[they] do not seem to be disturbed by the name” (Smith 516). It seems like Smith finds the term offensive because the term was given its fame from women being sexualized, assaulted, or both. Most people, like myself, have never put much thought into why the wife-beater was given its name until after reading Smith’s writing. Smith calls attention to the fact that “more than 4 million women are victims of severe assaults by boyfriends and husbands each year… [and] children of abusers often learn the behavior from their leaders” (517). Although Smith makes excellent points about domestic violence and the nature of the wife-beater tank tops, she fails to acknowledge one very important thing: men experience domestic violence just like women …show more content…

Most commonly, people question if domestic violence actually happens towards men because they feel like “if it happened frequently, we would hear more about it” (Cook 1). People also feel like if a man reports acts of sexual violence, then it is from “a woman who has been assaulted and [was] fighting back” (Cook 2) and that the injuries cannot be serious because women usually are not as strong as men (Cook 2). However, none of this is actually true, “the extent of [domestic abuse towards men] remains unknown… [because] violence against men tends to go unrecognized since men are less likely to admit to or report incidents because of embarrassment” (Barber 35). Many people do not believe that a woman could cause harm to a man, but in fact “male victims may experience broken limbs, knife wounds, teeth marks, scratches and lacerations” (Barber 38). Domestic abuse is not limited to physical harm, in fact, domestic violence is defined as “verbal, sexual, and emotional intimidation or financial abuse” (Barber 35). Basically, the perpetrator seeks a sense of power over the victim by using the ways listed above as a scare tactic. By using these tactics, the victims, both men and women, might feel forced to keep quiet of the initial abuse in fear that the abuse might become more

Open Document