The American Jury system had been used ever since we became a country. In fact the jury system originated from England a long time ago. The jury system is very controversial because it involves ordinary citizens making the verdict of criminal activities. Although we still use it, is it really necessary in today’s day and age. Obviously when someone is put on trial there needs to be a decision on whether they are guilty or not, but that’s why we also have a judge. Another way we can reach a verdict is through a bench trial where only the judge makes the decision. The judge is a legal expert on any present case, but the judge is the only person who makes the decision. For the most part either a bench trial or jury trial will get the job done and the proper verdict will be enforced, but it won’t always be that way. So what exactly should be done about the jury trial? Is it the right way to reach a verdict within the court or should there only be a bench trial? Overall the trial by jury should still be used today even with some controversial outcomes. The reasons it should be kept is because it was what the framers of our nation wanted, it gives the accused a fair trial, and it’s historically important to our nation as it still works for us today.
Our country has had this jury system ever since we became a nation. The framers of America spent a long time constructing our Constitution and making the many laws that would be a part of our daily lives. “The role of jury service in promoting self-governance and civic participation is hardly an
accident. The framers of the United States Constitution viewed jury service as a critically important feature of self-governance and enshrined the right to serve on juries in the Seventh Amendment...
... middle of paper ...
... special role of ensuring popular oversight in the judicial process” (Document C). Again our framers knew that having a jury system would be important especially down the road as our nation developed more. The jury system was made to be used hundreds of years after it was emplaced and it will continue that way.
In conclusion the jury system is still important to our country because it was what our founding fathers intended to use for later generations, it gives those found guilty a fair trial, and it historically impacts our nation for it being useful even today. It can’t be stressed any more then it is, but our jury system is very important to our country. Without it our trials would not be as fair and citizens would have less power as well as not getting their voice heard. It’s quite evident that our jury system will continue to be important down the road.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Our current trial by jury system was originally adopted from Anglo-Saxon English common law. Prior to juries, the United States had much more rudimentary methods that were in affect, such as bench trials. A bench trial consists of solely the judge determining the final verdict, versus a jury possessing that responsibility. Proceeding with a trial by jury assures that there will be a margin of error, simply due to the fact that the jurors are human, and are susceptible to human fallibility. Whether the jury is cognizant of it or not, emotions such as pre-determined bias and favoritism can impede or bring the case to a halt all together.... [tags: Jury, Jury trial, Bench trial, Common law]
781 words (2.2 pages)
- Trial by jury was introduced into the British judicial system in 1215 via the Magna Carta; whereby it declared that “No freeman shall be seized, or imprisoned... excepting by the lawful judgement of his peers...” (Towl and Crighton, 2010, p. 228). June 2015 marks the 800th anniversary of this fundamental directive, which since adoption has remained a ‘jewel’ within the criminal justice system (CJS). It exists in many jurisdictions around the world to this day, although to different degrees and with countless alterations.... [tags: Jury, Common law, Jury trial, Law]
2140 words (6.1 pages)
- The System Of Trial By Jury Operates A jury system consists of seven to twelve people, depending on the case and the court appearing in. Twelve jurors are used in Crown Court criminal cases for indictable offences. The Queens Bench Division of High Court where the cases involved are civil cases also have twelve jurors. These are cases involving libel and slander, fraud, malicious prosecution and false imprisonment. In civil cases at a County Court, eight jurors are present, although this is rare.... [tags: Papers]
1592 words (4.5 pages)
- Trial by Jury withing the English Legal System In our English Legal system, the jury has been a long part of establishment for centuries. It consists of 12 lay people, who represent a cross section of the public. They listen to both sides of a case and decide a verdict, based on the facts presented to them. Some people think that trial by jury is fairer than a judge because the jury is independent and therefore could not be influenced by the government. In the Crown Court criminal cases, twelve jurors are used for indictable offences.... [tags: Papers]
1747 words (5 pages)
- Trials by jury are adopted by most countries that use an adversarial legal system under the common law; that is when an impartial judge evaluates evidence gathered by two opposing parties independent of the juridical power as opposed to the civil law’s inquisitorial system where the court itself is involved in the investigation (Block, Parker, Vyborna & Dusek, 2000). The countries using the adversarial system, among which are the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia or USA, only use jury in high-profile criminal cases such as those involving murder, rape, manslaughter or false imprisonment (“When are juries used in criminal and civil cases?”).... [tags: Jury, Common law, Adversarial system, Jury trial]
1472 words (4.2 pages)
- The law balances the rights of victims, offenders and society to a certain extent in the criminal trial process. Mechanisms such as the use of evidence and witnesses, charge negotiations and juries are ways in which the legal system attempts to balance the rights of victims, offenders and society in the criminal trial process. Whilst they are effective in balancing rights, there are limitations to these mechanisms such as false witness statements, pressure to agree with charge negotiations and issues of bias with juries.... [tags: Jury, Jury trial, Law, Trial]
1178 words (3.4 pages)
- The American jury system is a time-honored tradition. It is the pinnacle of freedom and democracy – suspects are innocent until proven guilty, and they can only be proven guilty through the careful examination, cross-examination, and analysis of a case by lawyers, who present their case to a group of twelve equal citizens. Or is it. Jury trials are not the only type of trial in America, the other being a “bench trial” or trial by judge. Immediately, this sounds absurd – who would favor a bench trial over a jury.... [tags: Jury, Jury trial, Bench trial, Trial]
1241 words (3.5 pages)
- [An intricate part of due process in the United States is the jury trial system. The jury trial system provides a vehicle for the government to prove the case against the defendant and allows for the defendant to present a defense against the charge. In that process, the defendant has rights provided by the Sixth Amendment. Two of the rights afforded defendants are; the right to a speedy trial, the right to an impartial jury. The other important right is the right to an impartial judge, this was created by the Supreme Court.... [tags: Jury, United States Constitution, Jury trial]
1406 words (4 pages)
- The right to trial by jury in the modern times originates from twelfth century England during the reign of King Henry II. This system may originate from an “ancient right for an accused to be tried only “by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land”” (Thomas). In the United States, trial by jury is mentioned in Article Three of the Constitution and the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments. For many people, the jury system seems to be the fairest system and most unbiased way of determining a person’s innocence or guilt.... [tags: Trial by Jury ]
1395 words (4 pages)
- Franz Kafka’s novel “The Trial” examines a totalitarian system of justice that appears stems from human attempts to attain justice. An external, secret court exists outside of the public eye but holds the authority to carry out trials and judgements. When a startled Josef K is charged with some undisclosed act, Kafka examines the corrupt and absurd nature of the judiciary. As corruption runs through the system, it becomes normative and systemic in nature. Moreover, secrecy threatens the accused right to a fair trial, while symbols illustrate the totality of the justice system.... [tags: Jury, Judge, Law, The Trial]
1099 words (3.1 pages)