To Kill or Not to Kill, That is the Question

1157 Words3 Pages

To Kill or not to Kill
Since ancient times, nations all around the world have been imposing the death penalty for a wide variety of crimes such as rape, adultery, incest, murder, espionage, treason, military desertion, corruption, human trafficking, and even drug trafficking. Execution has been becoming less and less popular each year, but it is still a very controversial subject in today’s society. Some say that execution is unconstitutional, inhumane, or otherwise unfair. Death is feared widely above all other punishment. Capital punishment is not only the strongest deterrent, but it is also the most cost efficient solution to severe crimes, as well as the most effective in actually proving guilt, and bringing fair justice to the victims of these most heinous crimes.
Although almost all societies throughout history have used the death penalty as punishment for crimes, only fifty seven countries still use it today. About ninety percent of executions are done in Asia. Amongst the most severe forms of execution used in history, there has been death by boiling, slow slicing, crushing (by elephant), and stoning. In prerecorded times, feuds between tribes were often settled when one tribe offered the other a member of its tribe for execution. This person did not even have to be the original person to start the feud.
In ancient Greece, capital punishment laws were written by Draco, making death the punishment for a very wide range of crimes. Later Solon re wrote these laws so that different homicides were usually the only reason for being put to death. Many societies made the majority of their executions public, as a deterrent, so that the rest of the populations would take it as a warning. In medieval Europe, executions were also us...

... middle of paper ...

...anner of motions and objections to protect their clients from conviction” (California District Attorneys Association (CDAA)).
Choosing to be for or against the death penalty is a very simple subject. To be against capital punishment, means choosing a stance that believes that execution is too brutal, or inhumane. To be for capital punishment means to believe that the punishment fits the crime. If someone decided to murder another, they have chosen their own fate. Plenty of people go on with their lives, abiding by laws, and doing what they are supposed to. If one does not wish to be put to death, he or she should not take the life of another. People say execution is inhumane, meaning that putting a murderer to death in the most humane way possible is a horrific act. Is that to say that the most heinous, disgusting murders of all times do not deserve at least that?

Open Document