Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
UK Tax system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: UK Tax system
“Then saith he unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things that are God's.”1
Introduction
In an increasingly globalised world, governments control ever-greater proportions of our economy. Increasing longevity means greater requires increasing taxation for the majority.
This essay seeks to analyse taxation current, and proposed, and perhaps, where relevant, insights into mediocre utilitarian2 views, a thinking man’s deontological3 approach, and the virtuous approach; and also tax avoidance and evasion.
We also deal with non-natural individuals dealing with property.
Stamp duty
At present, borrowers purchasing a home below £125,000 are exempt from stamp duty tax. Thereupon, stamp duty tax is:
• 1% between £125,000.01 -£250,000;
• 3% between £250,000.01 -£500,000;
• 4% between £500,000.01 -£1,000,000;
• 5% between £1,000,000.01 - £2,000,000
• 7%for£2,000,000.01+
The above illustrates the idiocy of this tax structure. Not uncommon in London, consider one person purchasing a home at £1,000,000. They’d pay £40,000, whilst another purchases a home at £1,000,000.01 would pay £50,000. Obviously, a home would never be valued at this price, but it certainly serves to prove a point.
Stamp duty is amongst the most unpopular taxes relating to property tax, and is widely viewed as the most iniquitous and arbitrary tax. A group of Conservative Party backbenchers called the Free Enterprise Group call for a scrap of stamp duty tax on properties valued at less that £500,000.
The HomeOwners Alliance suggest the following 8 reforms4:
1 Matthew 22:21, King James Version
2 Utilitarianism definition – the doctrine that actions are right if they are useful, or, for the benefit
2 Utilita...
... middle of paper ...
...From Notches and Stimulus in the UK (June 2013) BEST and KLEVEN
II. Finance Bill 2014
III. Finance Act 2004
IV. http://www.jrf.org.uk/publications/council-tax-impacts
V. http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/rates/it.htm
VI. http://www.out-law.com/articles/2013/december/capital-gains-tax-to-be-
payable-by-non-resident-property-owners-confirms-chancellor-/
VII. http://www.mortgagestrategy.co.uk/news-and-
features/sectors/regulation/budget-2014-companies-face-15-stamp-duty-
levy-for-properties-worth-over-500k/2008123.article
VIII. http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/rates/it.htm
IX. http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/mortgages/stamp-duty
X. http://www.ippr.org/publications/property-and-wealth-taxes-in-the-uk-
the-context-for-reform
XI. h t t p : / / w w w . j r f. o r g . u k / s i t e s / fi l e s / j r f/ p r o p e r t y - t a x a t i o n - r e fo r m - fu l l . p d f

Netzer, D. (1973). The incidence of the property tax revisited. National Tax Journal, 26(4), 515-535.
Parliamentary taxes on the colonial peoples started with the Navigation Acts in 1660, but they were not an issue to the colonial people because they were too difficult to enforce. Then in 1764 the Stamp Act was passed, this was the first direct tax on the colonists. The Navigations Acts and the Sugar Acts of 1764, which was a tax placed on imported molasses and sugar, had not directly affected colonists, it affected the merchants. The merchants in hand would just raise prices. The stamp act was completely different. It said that any document or printed item would need to have a stamp placed on it purchased from the British government. The Stamp Act upset the colonist...
Even though the colonists resisted the Sugar Act, Britain issued another tax, the Stamp Act in March of 1765. The Stamp Act placed taxes on all legal documents from newspapers, pamphlets, licenses, legal documents and even playing...
Our current system of taxation is a varied rate percentage based on different income brackets. Many say that it violates our constitutional rights through unequal taxation. Multiple deductions, loopholes, special rates, and a complex system of regulations all characterize our Federal Income Tax System, prompting many to question why it is still being used (Peters, 2013). The current system although bringing in over $3 trillion, taxes income multiple times, and includes the taxing of estate, labor, savings, and investments (National Priorities Project, 2013). The system itself is complex with over 20,000 pages of regulations, requiring a massive filing system, which is set up and maintained by an even larger IRS, requiring over $225 billion in compliance costs (Hall, 2001). One can be hard pressed to find an advantage in the current system, other than the fact that it provides the government with an enormous amount of funds, and it has...
The federal income tax is broken up into different groups based on a tax payers marital status. Taxpa...
The Stamp Act put taxes on paper based items and a few not. Such as legal documents, newspapers, cards,dice,etc.. Everyday objects they know we use! They know playing cards are an asset and are common in households. We absolutely hate the Stamp Act because they are taxing us without our approval. The Stamp Act caused us to unite and unify to later create the Stamp Act Congress. Then the Quartering Act!! The Quartering Act required colonists to provide the British soldiers with food, shelter and supplies to tide them while they were in the area. We hate the Quartering Qct because we already have a shortage of food and supplies. Also it is an invasion of our privacy. While the Parliament felt it was justified and did not understand why we were protesting when the soldiers were the ones that were there to protect us. We did what we need and finaly got the Stam Act repealed but the same day the Stamp Act was repealed they came out with the Declaratory Act. This act stated that the Parliament had the right to rule and tax the colonist as they wished. We disagreed with all of these acts mostly because they were putting these taxes on us without our consentment. We have no representation in the Parliament and it is unfair. We came up with the slogan “No taxation without representation” We are becoming more and more separated from England because of the action they are
This paper will take a close look at the concepts of the "flat tax," and look at the possible benefits and potential failings. Although there is a basic format to the flat tax, there are multiple flat tax proposals that have been offered by conservatives. Along with critiquing the basic format of the flat tax, this paper will compare an...
“Utilitarianism is the creed which accepts as the foundations of morals utility of the greatest happiness principle holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness.” (Mil, 90). Utilitarianism ethics is based on the greatest good for the greatest number meaning that the moral agent does what he/she thinks will be
Utilitarianism is a moral theory that approaches moral questions of right and wrong by considering the actual consequences of a variety of possible actions. These consequences are generally those that either positively or negatively affect other living beings. If there are both good and bad actual consequences of a particular action, the moral individual must weigh the good against the bad and go with the action that will produce the most good for the most amount of people. If the individual finds that there are only bad consequences, then she must go with the behavior that causes the least amount of bad consequences to the least amount of people. There are many different methods for calculating the utility of each moral decision and coming up with the best
Utilitarianism is a theory aimed at defining one simple basis that can be applied when making any ethical decision. It is based on a human’s natural instinct to seek pleasure and avoid pain.
Utilitarianism is one of the most commonly used ethical theories from the time it was formulated by Jeremy Bentham and John Stewart Mill in the nineteenth century. In his work, Utilitarianism, Bentham “sought to dispel misconceptions that morality has nothing to do with usefulness or utility or that morality is opposed to pleasure” (MacKinnon, 2012, p. 53). To simplify the utilitarian principle, which is one of utility, one can surmise that morality is equated with the greatest amount of utility or good for the greatest number of people (MacKinnon, 2012). Also, with its orientation to the “end or goal of actions” (MacKinnon, 2012, p. 54), Utilitarianism thus, espouses the consequentialist principle, e.g., the evaluation of any human
Utilitarianism can be defined as: the right action is the one that produces the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarians seem to believe that humans only have two desires, or motivations: happiness and pain. They want as much happiness as possible and the least amount of pain as any other action. Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory, meaning that whether it is right, depends solely on its consequences.
Utilitarianism can be described as an ethical theory that states if the consequences of an action
Utilitarianism is defined to be “the view that right actions are those that result in the most beneficial balance of good over bad consequences for everyone involved” (Vaughn 64). In other words, for a utilitarian,
The Estate Tax, known as the ‘death tax’ as well as the ‘anti-birth tax’, has been one of the most controversial parts of the United States tax code since its introduction in 1916 (Cagetti & De Nardi, 85). The estate tax is a tax imposed upon assets transferred at the time of the estate holder’s death. Those opposed have named it the “death tax” as they claim it hurts business activity as well as job creation. However, according to those in favor, the estate tax is an effective way to tax the richest few, and redistribute their wealth, thereby narrowing the gap of inequality. For those in favor, an abolition of the estate tax would impose a “birth tax” of sorts onto the majority of Americans who have not inherited a large sum of money (Cagetti & De Nardi, 87). The controversial estate tax in the United States is often questioned by many and has been challenged time and time again. However, more emphasis has typically been put on particular aspects of the tax code where points of dispute are found.