Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rousseau and Marx: Property and Inequality Essay
Jean-jacques rousseau's philosophical essay a discourse on inequality
Jean-jacques rousseau's philosophical essay a discourse on inequality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rousseau and Marx: Property and Inequality Essay
Introduction
Equality is the most common word related with socialism. This does not ensure that socialism can deliver effective equality.
The Mozambican post-independence phase is characterized by a socialist regime and by the intention of providing socialist equality. The underdevelopment situation of Mozambique shaped the idea of equality, which was considered the ultimate reward of the pursuit of development. Therefore the leitmotif of social policy provided by social regime could not be focused on anything else but chasing development.
Equality, socialism and social policy
The Oxford Dictionaries define equality as: “The state of being equal, especially in status, rights, or opportunities” (Oxford Dictionaries, 2013).
Equality has always been a controversial concept, although the majority of philosophers and sociologists have always agreed in underlining its importance.
One of the most important philosophers who disagree with the possibility of equality among all is Aristotle. He believes in the principle of treating like cases alike (Aristotle, 2000). According to his point of view, formal equality is not possible. Moreover Aristotle says that equality, justice and wealth should be based on merit (Aristotle, 1984), which is not included as peculiarity in the common definition of equality.
Opposite understanding about equality is defined by Rousseau. He writes that nobody should “ever be wealthy enough to buy another, and none poor enough to be forced to sell himself” (Rousseau, 1973, I, 1, p.223). According to Rousseau, the formal equality exists among men but only in the state of nature: “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains” (Rousseau, 1973, II, 11, p.181).
However, the idea of equality represents differ...
... middle of paper ...
... the analysis we can conceptualize it with a syllogism. If socialism is equality and achieving development is Mozambican socialism, then the achievement of development is the achievement of equality.
Thus how effective was the programme of development in Mozambique?
The premises of an across-the-board target of the wellbeing reforms, people participation and gender equality were encouraging starting point towards equality.
However the lack of revolutionary working class and rooting of socialism within the traditional culture made the achieving of development and then the expected equality hard. As Robinson (2003) explains, the failure of equality was clearly demonstrated during the Third Frelimo Congress by the switch from a mass party to a vanguard party with the end of a workers’ control of production and the advent of centralisation of power in state apparatus.
The first standard of equality is ontological equality which is the notion that everyone is created equal at birth. Ontological equality often justifies material inequality. In fact, this type of equality is sometimes used to put forth the notion that poverty is a virtue. A second standard of equality is equality of opportunity meaning that “everyone has an equal chance to achieve wealth, social prestige, and power because the rules of the game, so to speak, are the same for everyone”( Conley, 247). Therefore, any existing inequality is fair as long as everyone plays by the rules. The standard of equality is equality of condition, which is the idea that everyone should have an equal starting point. The last form of equality is equality of outcome which states, everyone should end up with the same outcome regardless of
Equality appears to be the ideal factor that can perfect a society. It eliminates the need to feel envious of any human or their qualities. Nevertheless, with impartiality comes lack of diversity and ambition. Inequality is the entity that provides individuals with the passion to strive for a better life. If everyone has already reached their full potential there is no purpose for living.
Social equality is the concept in which all individuals possess the same fundamental basic liberties, opportunities, moral value/respect, and social benefits. The concept of ‘equality’ has a multiplicity of meanings and definitions, and with the rise of liberalization and democratization around the world ‘social equality’ has become the most predominant. As economic openness creates greater wealth disparities, the parallel rise of democratization has enabled citizens to demand more accountability measures and public welfare services from their governments in order to manage such disparities. Although the movement towards greater social equality has made significant strides with the establishment of equal rights (especially in the 1960s following the civil rights and women rights movement), inequality is still widespread in society among different ethnicities, social classes, and even religions. Inequality is not, however, a characteristic that only encompasses/embodies developing countries, but also embodies developed countries as well.
This excerpt from the Declaration of independence specifically stated that all men are created equal, but that is contradiction to the governments decisions.
I believe equality means every individual should be treated and given the same attention no matter who they are. No individual should be discriminated due to their disability. The equality act came into effect in October 2010. This is a law which protects people from being treated differently because of their disability. Equality in health care is ensuring everyone has an access to medical care despite who they are. Equality is about creating a fairer society where everyone regardless of who they are has a chance to fulfil their potential. By getting rid of prejudice and discrimination, the NHS can now distribute services that are personal, fair and diverse society which is healthier and happier.
So in conclusion are all men created equal yes but no, created equal but they are not treated equal they are treated the way , that social class accepts them, to be treated and how they portray they are treated. If your poor your treated less than equal to the rich, and vice versa. The way you are treated is determined on your social class. So yes everyone is created equal but not treated equal.
When it comes to economics, income inequality is solved through wealth distribution. It robs from the rich while giving to the poor. Well, It worked for Robin Hood. Unfortunately equality is an ideology that ignores human nature. The incentive for the Haves to work hard is taken
Gender inequality is often a broad, abstract, and vague idea. This is one of the great puzzles of modern society and explaining gender inequality has proven to be a challenging task to say the least. After all the years spend on this subject, we have not been able to discover why the blooming of equality has failed. While some argue that it was wrong to ever challenge the practices that oppress women, others add that the mistake was to believe that women and men are inherently the same and we are simply collecting the inescapable sequence of nature. How much true is in these arguments? Could there be another answer?
This has been demonstrated most prominently through the lives of African Americans and the corresponding Civil Rights movement. As many of these societal problems have been settled over time, problematic issues still arise today. In John Szwed’s book, Space is the Place: The Life and Times of Sun Ra, he addresses this concept of equality. He writes, “Equality is another false goal. There is no equality in nature, no democracy, only hierarchy, where you are judged by your quality. Music is not based on equality-the chords and notes are all different. Equality means nothing to God: everyone he sent here is unique. I have to rise above liberty and freedom and equality” (Szwed 310). This is significant because addressing this prevailing issue is very prevalent in creating a utopia. However, the subject of equality in our specific utopia evolves specific to the issue of what it looks like to live a “healthy lifestyle” in relation to each individual. While one person may have their own vision of what living a healthy lifestyle looks like, another person may have a different perspective. Because of this, I agree with Szwed in that true equality is a false goal. We are all different individuals with our own bodies that function in their own special way. What may be healthy for one, may not work for another. There is no set standard for equality in living a healthy
The Merrian-Webster definition of equality is the quality or state of having the same rights, social status, ect… While watching T.V. George peered at the ballerina who was wearing large heavy government issued handicap bags, handicaps being setbacks. She was also wearing an extremely ugly mask
Inequality: The meaning of inequality is nothing be equal especially in status, rights, and opportunities. It is a concept very much at the heart of social justice theories. However, it is prone to confusion in public debate as it tends to mean different people to different things. Some distinctions are common though. Many authors distinguish the economic inequality, income inequality, monetary inequality and other impotent one living conditions.
Throughout history, wars over the meaning to equality have being expressed in different ways for the purpose to establishing one standard meaning of equality. The meaning to equal is a state of being equal. What it means to be equal between males and females is being treated with the same amount of respect based on qualification, skills, knowledge and the ability to acquire qualification, skills, and knowledge. The social and economic system has benefited greatly with the deontology theory in defining and developing gender equality. However, it has been a slow process. The meaning of equality between males and females has not always had a message of clarity. Miscommunication and misunderstanding of the meaning of equality between males and females has been responsible for tyranny. Happiness, fairness, and dignity has risen from social roles, poverty, and health reform that defined the message to the question of what it means to be equal and unequal among men and women using the deontology theory as this essay will demonstrate.
Formal equality is known as the formal, legal equality. This is the equality that is seen as one law should be applied to all people, social and personal characteristics are no factor. Formal equality aims to distribute equality fairly and evenly, and aims to treat people the same. Formal equality does not ensure the wellbeing of individuals based on race, ethnicity, sex, age etc. Unfortunately, this side of equality does not recognize diversity and is insufficient for promoting social inclusiveness. Even though it may give the illusion of equality and justice, it is actually creating inequality and is actually ending up discriminating individuals (EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, 2004).
Do we truly understand how the meaning to equality among men and women affect society. Jobs, health, and education are affected by what transpires from the meaning to gender equality. Throughout history equality has been debated. Equality is defined as getting respect and giving respect regardless of gender or culture through fair treatment and maximized happiness. Balance and harmony are developed from the application of ethical theories to aid society in defining the meaning to gender equality rather than debating the issue. Therefore, defining gender equality should be the role of society by utilizing ethical theories. The theories can be consequentialist or nonconsequentialist acts that develop and maintain good morality and ethical
Before trying to discover if men and women can share equality, a clear definition of “equality” should be established. According to Dictionary.com, “equality” is defined as “the state or quality in being uniform in operation or effect; correspondence in quantity, degree, value, rank, or ability.” So what is the significance of the definition of equality to gender equality? How does the word affect the question asked? Overall, this changes what exactly men and women can be equal in, which includes rankings, abilities, and opportunities whether that be in education, the work force, or in any other environment.