The Reflection Of Prejudice And Discrimination

999 Words2 Pages

Some people explicitly admit the extinction of prejudice and discrimination. It supports the view that those social phenomena are inevitable due to the automatic functioning in perception. The differentiation in judgement and action is usually produced with group categorization, which enables people to recognize an individual’s group identity (Wright, 2016). Generally, when only little and simple information provided, such action introduces the generalized treatments to others based on their collective characteristic (Wright, 2016). This cognitive function is an unconscious process that people may not be aware of their changes in attitude and behavior related to others’ group-based differences. Moreover, compared with ingroup, the differentiation …show more content…

Although the tattoo popularity keeps rising in the recent decades, non-tattooed people tend to view the tattoo itself adversely rather than a piece of art. Through applying Martin Stigma Against Tattoos Survey (MSATS) in the study, participants’ attitude toward the correlation between the stigma of tattoo and its biased information. The results point out that the misconceptions about the tattooed population have a strong influence, which tends to bring up negative emotion and attitudes. For example, people tend to relate tattooed people implicitly with gangs, violence, poor academic performance and other adverse events, due to the wide promotion of these distorted and exaggerated images through the mass media. In addition, although tattooed individuals may know the fact that the stigma of tattoo is inaccurate and negative, discrimination is likely to be recognized because of receiving differential treatments from the others. So a large proportion of them tends to place tattoos on parts of bodies which can be easily covered up, in order to prevent fear and isolation from the public and to avoid negative judgment from superior decision-makers like teachers and …show more content…

It suggested that tattoo as an art piece enables people to produce the feeling of power and control. Due to the fact that such cognitive perception implicitly strengthens the connection between the tattooed individuals and their power. Despite an increasing population of tattooed women, a contradiction is formed between tattoo’s representation of power and female inferior social status, which may lead tattooed women to face higher levels of prejudice and discrimination from men. In the study of female tattooing, different gender groups do possess variance in feelings and reactions. Both tattooed and non-tattooed participants are randomly assigned to one of the conditions: a scenario about a woman with or without a tattoo. The attitude measurement with adjective pairs and Neosexism Scale are applied to measure individuals’ attitude toward the female character and their level of sexism. Overall, almost all the participants reported low score in sexism. The result shows that regardless of gender, all non-tattooed individuals reported negative feelings toward the tattooed female character. But in the evaluation of power awareness, both tattooed and non-tattooed women rate higher in power and less in passiveness toward the female character with tattoo than without tattoo. Those tattooed men also have a similar result to the women. In contrast, non-tattooed men rated tattooed female

More about The Reflection Of Prejudice And Discrimination

Open Document