Should the government only restrict an individual’s freedom in order to prevent harm to others?

Should the government only restrict an individual’s freedom in order to prevent harm to others?

Length: 1412 words (4 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Powerful Essays

Open Document

Essay Preview

In a democratic society, it is generally considered the Government's role to promote morality and justice within its citizens and seek to restrict supposedly immoral and unjust acts. Thus if an act is to be considered immoral, it seems obvious to suggest that the government is justified in restricting it regardless of whether it is harmful to others. However, since everybody has a different understanding of morality and freedom, no Government could legitimately restrict an act on the basis of it being 'immoral'. Thus it seems more plausible to suggest that the Government should only restrict actions which everybody can agree should be restricted. However it's not clear where the line should be drawn or how a consensus on the issue could be reached.

John Stuart Mill put forth an idea, commonly known as the 'harm principle', in which he argued that the government may only legitimately interfere in our actions to prevent harm, or the threat of harm, to others. For Mill it wasn't enough to simply do something that people didn't like rather, one has to actually cause another harm. Mill's argument seems designed to protect our individual freedoms against government paternalism, through which our ability to express ourselves may be restricted under the pretence that we are being protected from ourselves. For Mill the only time we must justify our actions to society, or the government, are when they concern others and most importantly, bring them harm.

Mill makes it clear that harm is much more than mere offence, he also gives some examples including physical harm and harm to our financial interests such as taking away property or money without our consent. Mill also accepts harm in certain instances such as judicial punishment, so ...

... middle of paper ...

...onally accept harm as legitimate reason for the government to restrict individual freedoms, everyone's understanding of what constitutes 'harm' is different. Utilitarian's may propose that harm is anything that is detrimental to an individual's happiness. If freedom is as important as Mill suggests then we can consider any restriction on freedom harmful, in which case the Government must constantly consider the degree of harm necessary to justify and outweigh the harm they will undoubtedly be causing by imposing restrictions on individual freedom. On this account of harm, we can conclude both that not only should the government only restrict an individual’s freedom in order to prevent harm to others, but also that the level of harm must be enough to outweigh the harm caused by a restriction of individual freedoms. For Mill, this would have been a very high threshold.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

John Stuart Mill's Harm Principle Essay

- John Stuart Mill discusses the conception of liberty in many ways. I’d like to focus of his ideas of the harm principle and a touch a little on his thoughts about the freedom of action. The harm principle and freedom on action are just two subtopics of Mill’s extensive thoughts about the conception on liberty. Not only do I plan to discuss and explain each of these parts on the conception of liberty, but I also plan to discuss my thoughts and feelings. I have a few disagreements with Mill on the harm principle; they will be stated and explained....   [tags: John Stuart Mill, harm principle,]

Powerful Essays
974 words (2.8 pages)

Essay on Causal Impotence And The Global Environmental Harm

- Introduction: In the Nammour Symposium, the topic was Causal Impotence. The presentation that I attended was the essay winners. Danielle Williams, Jacob Lampl and Thomas Dunn were the winners and they each were giving a talk about their winning essay. The topic is causal impotence and the global environmental harm. In this paper, I will summarize the main points of each presenter. Following, I will move on to my critique on one of the presenters. Summary: The first presenter was Danielle Williams....   [tags: Person, Individual, Agriculture, Carbon dioxide]

Powerful Essays
721 words (2.1 pages)

Essay on Should Nations Restrict Immigration?

- Should Nations Restrict Immigration. In this short essay I will address the issue of whether or not nations should restrict immigration. It is important to note that my perspective is derived from years of living in an American society. When I speak of immigrants in many cases I’ll be referring to illegal immigrants, as they are the ones to whom the restrictive laws are made in as a preventative means. Additionally, they are the ones people fear and refer to primarily when discussing immigration....   [tags: ethical, society, laws]

Powerful Essays
641 words (1.8 pages)

Effects Of Self Harm On Young People Who Self Ham Essay

- INTRODUCTION: This commentary explores some of the existing literature, policy and legislation relevant to the rationale and design of a leaflet appropriate for young people who self-ham. It is thought that about 1 in 10 young people in the UK have self-harmed at some point in their life. Although it has been found that self-harm predominantly affect vulnerable adolescence the reasons for doing so cannot not always be generalised (Hawton et al, 2012). In the absence of a commonly agreed definition of adolescence, age has been used to define young people, as opposed to physical characteristics or cognitive development....   [tags: Suicide, Suffering, Self-harm]

Powerful Essays
1079 words (3.1 pages)

Today’s Youths Inclination to Self-Harm Essay

- Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI,) is a condition that affects many teens around the world. The DSM-V, Diagnosis and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders the fifth addition, recognizes it as a psychosis that needs further research, and is regarded as a person who cuts, burns, pulls hair, breaks bones, and causes harm to one’s self without the intent of death. Non-suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI), is described when no other disorder, such as autism spectrum and substance abuse are present. Although some see self-harm as a trend research shows that, the activity has been going on for a long time....   [tags: self harm, suicide, nssi, suicidal behavior]

Powerful Essays
864 words (2.5 pages)

Should Individual Citizens in Canada Be Able To Own Guns? Essay

- Should Individual Citizens in Canada Own Guns. Recently, there has been an issue in Canada on whether individual citizens can have their own handguns or not. Some believe that gun control is absolutely necessary to prevent people from becoming victims of gun crimes, while others maintain the exact opposite view. I agree with the latter, but I also think it is appropriate for the government to regulate the gun-dealing business. First of all, disarming the ordinary people punished the law-abiding citizens, secondly, no clear evidence links gun availability with gun violence, and lastly, with laws to rule the gun-dealing industry, it will not be a concern that people will be shot by a legal gun...   [tags: Individual Rights, Canadian, Gun Control]

Powerful Essays
662 words (1.9 pages)

What is harm? Essay

- In On Liberty, Mill presents and argues “the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will is to prevent harm to others. ” (9). Society has the right to use the law to regulate the conduct that consists in of “ injuring the interest of one another, or rather certain interest which, either by express legal provision or tacit understanding, ought to be considered as rights’ (chp 4; 73). Society may use public opinion to monitor conduct that “may be hurtful to others or wanting in due consideration for their welfare, without going to the length of violating any of their constituted rights’ (chp 4; 73)....   [tags: On Liberty, Mill, Analysis]

Powerful Essays
1801 words (5.1 pages)

Essay about The Harm Dilemma

- Anthropologists face ethical decisions every day, in which they must balance the often competing interests of their obligations against the demands that are placed upon them. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines ethical behaviour as “conforming to accepted standards of conduct”. For Anthropologists, the ethical risks faced in fieldwork are defined by their ethical obligations. This paper will discuss, in a limited scope, both the ethical risks of fieldwork and the obligations of an anthropologist....   [tags: ethics, anthropology, risk]

Powerful Essays
765 words (2.2 pages)

Essay on The Harm Principle in the 21st Century

- The Harm Principle in the 21st Century I intend to reassess the main criticisms levelled against John Stuart Mill's, Harm Principle. I will argue that his Principle has, with the benefit of hindsight, had a positive rather than negative influence upon society and given a framework within which citizens can be free to accept or reject options. I will show that, On Liberty is as significant today as when it was first published. Mill's Harm Principle says that, other things being equal, we should be free from interference either by the state or an individual....   [tags: John Stuart Mills Harm Principle Essays]

Powerful Essays
3458 words (9.9 pages)

Essay on Harm Reduction

- “Harm reduction is based on the premise that people are responsible for their behaviour, that they maker personal choices that affect their health and well-being, and that they can make safer and better decisions if given useful and honest information” (Mathre, 2002, p. 106). Harm reduction recognizes people’s unhealthy choices while also attempting to reduce the harmful effects that come from these unhealthy behaviours (Marlatt, 1998 as cited in Brown, Luna, Ramirez, Vail, and Williams, 2005)....   [tags: Nursing]

Powerful Essays
1188 words (3.4 pages)