Personal Response To The Epic Of Gilgamesh

733 Words2 Pages

Personal Response to N. K. Sardars’s “Epic of Gilgamesh” During the reading of this epic, many background thoughts have to be done to have a complete understanding of the cultural differences between approximately four thousands years ago and our actual society. We most take in considerations their gods and what they represented. Their customs might seem estrange to us, but to them they were as normal as bathing everyday to our society. Gilgamesh is one important piece in the understanding of our past, and understanding what societies were like millenniums ago. Gilgamesh is the basic tale of a hero and it’s adventures, with a unique aspect that the outcome of the story is that the main character does not obtain what he is looking for. Gilgamesh was the son of the King of Uruk and the goddess Ninsun, who was a minor goddess known …show more content…

Now that he is seen a man of equal strength die next to him, he feels the need to not be mortal anymore. After a long journey he is sent to the bottom of the sea to find a strange flower that will give him the forever youth. He finds the plant and returns to the surface, but right afterwards he falls asleep. When he wakes up he sees a snake changing it’s skin, now knowing that the last opportunity to be immortal was eaten by a snake. This part has something in common with one of our most read books, the Bible. In the first testament the origin of our specie is explained, and the reason why we do not live forever is because Adam, the first man on Earth, ate the prohibited fruit after being pushed by a snake. They relate because in both stories there are a special fruit of plant that promises the forever life, or takes it away. Also the snake is present in both stories, with the difference that in the Bible the snake wants Adam to eat the fruit so that his immortality is gone, and on Gilgamesh the snake becomes immortal after eating the promising

Open Document