The Quasi-Legislative Effect of the Supreme Court of Canada
25 March 2014
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982 symbolized a new era for Canada. Championed by Pierre Elliot Trudeau, the charter entrenched the fundamental rights and freedoms of Canadian society, and allowed for those rights to be enforced by any individual should they be infringed upon. The enactment of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms illustrates yet another shift from traditional Westminster style of governance, and created a new political atmosphere. The notion of Parliamentary supremacy has shifted to accommodate constitutional supremacy, where two institutions must work together to balance the will of the elected and the language of the charter. Constitutions, the most basic of political institutions, have the power to affect politics, by defining the rules of the political sphere. Though Parliament remains supreme, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms has empowered the judiciary with the ability to interpret it broadly and settle major questions of public policy, something the Bill of Rights, 1960 could never really achieve. The charter has in effect, given the judiciary a quasi-legislative authority.
This paper will argue that the Supreme Court of Canada has adopted a quasi-legislative approach in its decision making as a result of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982. Quasi-legislative is defined as having a partly legislative character by possession of the right to make rules and regulations, having the force of law (Merriam-Webster). In this paper, it is useful to define quasi-legislative as the court’s ability to influence policy, be it innocent or motivated, through charter enf...
... middle of paper ...
... of the judiciary as being one separate from government, in a non-political capacity whose purpose is not to question the acts of government, but rather to be the mediator when dispute arise (McLachlin, 2009). Clearly, McLachlin captures the essence of what the judiciary is. The Supreme Court of Canada is one of the most visible and trusted political institutions, which has shaped the country’s political arena. In practice, the Supreme Court of Canada does have a quasi-legislative effect on public policy.
This paper has argued that the Supreme Court of Canada has adopted a quasi-legislative role in their decision making as a result of the Charter or Rights and Freedoms, 1982.The broad and liberal interpretation of charter language, for better or worse has and will continue to influence Canadian politics and the formulation and adoption of public policy.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- R. v. Williams  1 SCR1. 1128 The Supreme Court of Canada. Judgement by McLachlin J. Also present: Lamer C.J. and L’Heureux Dubé, Gonthier, Cory, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache and Binnie JJ. Victor Daniel Williams, an Aboriginal man, came before the Court charged with the robbery of a pizza parlour in Victoria, British Columbia. Williams plead not guilty, claiming that someone else had committed said robbery. When preparing for his trial, Williams asked that the defense be allowed to question potential jurors on racial bias against aboriginals, and use challenge for cause if a bias was found, which the judge allowed.... [tags: Jury, Court, Supreme Court of the United States]
809 words (2.3 pages)
- The Prime Minister of Canada has an integral role within the Canadian parliament. In the political Parliamentary system of Canada, the Prime Minister wields the executive responsibility. He is accountable for an assortment of administrative, managerial, and supervisory decisions in effect across the country. The executive role is the branch of government that is generally responsible for creating laws, and enforcing the regulations to ensure these laws are observed. The Prime Minister is the Head of Government in Canada.... [tags: Politics, Canada]
2331 words (6.7 pages)
- The Supreme Court has made numerous decisions that have impacted the United States Government as well as the citizenry of the United States. The Marshall court is recognized as making a decision on the most important case in the history of the Supreme Court. William Marbury was to be appointed to the position of Justice of the Peace in the District of Columbia, but his appointment was never fulfilled. Marbury then filed a writ of mandamus to attempt and force the new Secretary of State, James Madison to deliver the appointment.... [tags: Supreme Court of the United States]
1139 words (3.3 pages)
- Nature’s Judicial Process in the Supreme Court consists of decision-making; based on the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. Although the Supreme Court has the capability to decide all extended cases; it also has the power to ascend under the Constitution, which allows the Supreme Court its jurisdiction in the Judicial Branch of government. The Judicial Process interpret the laws that are established in the Supreme Court; thus, allowing the Court to exercise its power by shifting its system under the Constitutional laws of the United States.... [tags: American Government, Supreme Court]
1160 words (3.3 pages)
- The Supreme Court of the United States has made many bad decisions throughout history. Whether that be the decision of the Court itself, their decision making process, the reasoning, or just by accepting the case for review can all aid in what makes a bad decision. Justice Louis D. Brandeis created a set of rules known as the Ashwander rules in his concurring opinion of Ashwander v Texas Valley Authority 1936. These guidelines were created to help the Court and future justices determine what kind of cases should or should not be accepted, and if they are accepted, what kind of things to stay away from or adhere to.... [tags: Supreme Court of the United States]
3953 words (11.3 pages)
- Inequality, regarding the workplace and workforce, refers to a state of being which involves an absence of opportunity, fairness, and equality, coupled with the presence of extreme variability for a person or group. This extreme variability in work related conditions can lead to the development of strong feelings of insecurity in any person who has experienced such inequality. Insecurity is a feeling or situation people may experience where there is uncertainty, instability, a lack of safe working conditions, and feelings of doubt about work etc.... [tags: Canada]
1631 words (4.7 pages)
- In 1990, the Canadian Supreme Court exempted members of the Musqueam community from general fishing restrictions on cultural grounds. Choose either the “unequal impact argument” or “the cultural resources argument” and explain how it might be used to support the view that it was right to grant an exemption in this case. Evaluate the strength of the argument as it applies to the case. On the 25th May 1984 Musqueam Band Member Ron Sparrow was caught fishing in the traditional Indian Fraser river fishery, using a 45 fathom drift net in direct contravention of his band’s food fishing licence issued by the Canadian Department for Fisheries which stipulated that Musqueam band members could only us... [tags: Fishing, Canada]
1089 words (3.1 pages)
- The Supreme Court of Canada and the Charter A democracy is a way of governing a country in which the people elect representatives to form a government on behalf of the country; with such a government, the idea is that everyone in that country has social equality. Social equality is state of uniformity in quantity, measure, value, privileges, status, or rights within a given society. Canada is thought to be a democratic country because, similar to the definition, the Canadian citizens select representatives by ballot to form a government on behalf of the country.... [tags: Papers]
2274 words (6.5 pages)
- It was 1803 when Chief Justice Marshall used Marbury v. Madison to constitute the “legal principle of judicial review” (Marbury v. Madison). Judicial review allows the Supreme Court to rule on an issue concerning rather another branch of government’s legislation is constitutional or not. This is a basic definition, somewhat generic if you will. What is the deeper meaning/ use of judicial review. How does it affect modern day society. These are important questions to ask when one is trying to comprehend how a federal system operates, and advances with its society.... [tags: Judicial Review, Supreme Court]
1014 words (2.9 pages)
- Canada This ISP is is about my views on the Canadian Constitution and what I think needs to be changed in it. Some topics I have chose to discus, which I think need to be changed ar ones such as the notwithstanding claws and it's disadvantages, as well as the discanct society claws and it's disadvantages as well as what effects it has on the Canadian socity. I will also discuis the effects and disadvantages of what the appontiment of the suprem court judges. The supreme court of Canada is yhe higest court in Canada.... [tags: essays papers]
679 words (1.9 pages)