Popper 's Theory Vs. Scientific Theory Essay

Popper 's Theory Vs. Scientific Theory Essay

Length: 1378 words (3.9 double-spaced pages)

Rating: Strong Essays

Open Document

Essay Preview

Popper claims basic statements are not justified by experience, but accepted by choice or convention. This claim is argued through a rejection of ‘psychologism’ and inductivism. According to Popper, scientific theory can be seen the fog above a swamp full of basic statements; the acceptance of a theory comes from an evaluation of basic statements and the conscious decision to accept or reject the theory. Popper comes to this conclusion after considering the problem of psychologism, distinguishing science from non-science, examining the falsification of theories and their testability, and then comparing perceptual experience and basic statements to illustrate how we come to form and accept scientific theory as empirical. Poppers arguments are clearly laid out but his conclusion may pose a problem. Still, Popper brings up a number of factors that complicate our ability to produce empirical, justified theory. His conclusion has interesting implications for what scientific knowledge is, and if humans can truly have it. Accepting this view has interesting implications for the nature of empirical knowledge, and could positively affect the way we pursue that knowledge.
He begins with the problem of psychologism, which he defines as “the doctrine that empirical sciences are reducible to sense-perceptions” (“Logic of Scientific Discovery,” 74). Popper states that the decision to accept a basic statement is connected to experiences in that they can motivate a decision, but a basic statement cannot be justified by experiences. The problem seems to be that he sees theories as statements about the world, similar to basic statements, therefore theory can be motivated by experience but not justified by it; or, the motivation to accept a t...

... middle of paper ...

... solid bedrock,” he continues to describe it as “a building erected on piles …, driven down from above into the swamp, but not down to any natural or ‘given’ base” (“Logic of Scientific Discovery,” 94). He gives a reminder at the end of this chapter, that “if we stop driving the piles deeper, it is not because we have reached firm ground” (“Logic of Scientific Discovery,” 94). The firm ground he refers to is truth, or an ultimate source of knowledge, which could be entirely unattainable. We must continue going deeper until we are satisfied, but must remember that eventually, we will sink further. The value in accepting Popper’s view lies in the understanding that scientific knowledge is not a determined point we must reach, but something we continually strive towards. While this implies an infinite pursuit, it also means we are not limited in what we may discover.

Need Writing Help?

Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.

Check your paper »

Susser's Three Characteristics to Argue that the Outcome and Exposure can only be Inferred from Epidemiological Studies

- The scientific method is built on the principle that nothing can ever be proved as definitively true. Rather, once a hypothesis is proposed, evidence can be generated in favor of the hypothesis or in favor of an alternative hypothesis. When enough evidence is gathered in one direction or the other, the original hypothesis is either accepted or debunked in favor of an alternative. As scientific work is always in flux, any previously accepted theory can always be overturned by new evidence.1, 2 Many epidemiologists accept Popper’s thesis that causality can never be truly proven; although, once enough reliable evidence has been accumulated, a causal relationship can be inferred.2 The question o...   [tags: Scientific method, popper's theory, causality]

Strong Essays
1015 words (2.9 pages)

The Scientific Method Of Scientific Theory Essay

- The following essay will discuss falsification, as discussed by Karl Popper, as well has his account of the scientific method. The idea whether any scientific theory can truly be falsified will also be approached by looking at the problems presented by Popper’s theory of falsification, and the impact this has on the scientific method and science as a whole. Popper believes that science does not begin with the collection of empirical data, but starts with the formulation of a hypothesis (Veronesi, 2014, p1)....   [tags: Scientific method, Falsifiability, Theory]

Strong Essays
1598 words (4.6 pages)

Karl Popper and Falsifiability Essay

- Karl Popper and Falsifiability Karl Popper's claim that "the criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability" is a clearly viable statement. This is a natural extension of his idea about how scientific knowledge is increased (Edwards, 1967). In an attempt to define science from pseudo-science, Popper states that the growth of scientific knowledge begins with an "imaginative proposal of hypotheses" (Edwards, 1967). Then, the scientist must search for illustrations or situations that falsify or negate the hypothesis....   [tags: Science Scientific Karl Popper Essays]

Strong Essays
1346 words (3.8 pages)

Popper and Kuhn: Two Views of Science Essay example

- Popper and Kuhn: Two Views of Science In this essay I attempt to answer the following two questions: What is Karl Popper’s view of science. Do I feel that Thomas Kuhn makes important points against it. The two articles that I make reference to are "Science: Conjectures and Refutations" by Karl Popper and "Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?" by Thomas Kuhn. In the article, "Science: Conjectures and Refutations", Karl Popper attempts to describe the criteria that a theory must meet for it to be considered scientific....   [tags: Science Scientific Essays Popper Kuhn]

Strong Essays
1441 words (4.1 pages)

Is Intelligent Design Theory A Scientific Theory? Essay

- QUESTION: is Intelligent Design Theory a scientific theory. Does it make testable predictions. Is Darwinism a Scientific Theory. Does it make testable predictions. When analysing science and the concepts and arguments relating to scientific theory, it is important to separate an argument that has its foundations in science and that which sounds scientific but really should be labelled as pseudo-science. The distinction between the two was first analysed by Karl Popper, who viewed scientific theory in terms of testability and falsifiability....   [tags: Scientific method, Falsifiability, Theory]

Strong Essays
1471 words (4.2 pages)

The Scientific Method Of Critical Rationalism Essay

- Voltaire said “the perfect is the enemy of the good” (Voltaire 74). In striving for a perfect definition and application of scientific analysis, Karl Popper established an impractical and ineffective approach to science. In this paper, I will discuss the premises and principles behind Popper’s scientific method of critical rationalism. I will then explain where I believe his method succeeds, where it fails, and why I consider his method both impractical and ineffective. I will do so by first explaining his thoughts on science versus the status quo, then I will take the position that his approach is flawed and impractical, and lastly conclude with a commentary on why truth has to be flexible....   [tags: Scientific method, Falsifiability, Karl Popper]

Strong Essays
1434 words (4.1 pages)

Sir Karl Popper's Falsifiability Claim Essay

- Sir Karl Popper's Falsifiability Claim Popper's claim that "the criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability" (Klemke, 1988) may be viewed as an observation of, rather than a complete departure from, earlier criteria for science. Klemke states in his introduction to part one (p. 16) that defining science (or the scientific method) has traditionally consisted of utilizing seven criteria that must be met in a specific order. Criteria number (5) and (6) refer to deduction rather than induction, and will negate criterion (4) if not met....   [tags: Sir Karl Popper Science Essays]

Free Essays
765 words (2.2 pages)

Conjectures and Refutations by Sir Karl Popper Essay

- Conjectures and Refutations by Sir Karl Popper In a broad sense science is a systematic quest for knowledge. With this working definition in mind one can see that many areas of human endeavors could qualify as science. Therefore, Popper attempts to find a point of demarcation between science and psuedo-science. "Is there a criterion for the scientific character or status of theory."(1) The most widely accepted answer to this problem Popper says is induction and empirical method. At this point I find it necessary to define these two terms....   [tags: Science Sir Karl Popper Scientists Essays]

Free Essays
1106 words (3.2 pages)

The Scientific Theory Of Scientific Theories Essay

- Are any scientific theories true. If so why. If not why do we rely on them. A scientific theory is an explanation that is well- substantiated explanation in regards to some aspect of the natural world that is attained through scientific method and is tested numerous times and usually confirmed through vigorous observation and experimentation. The term theory can be seen as a collection of laws which allow you to show some kind of phenomenon. The strength of a scientific theory associated with the diversity of phenomena can explain its elegance and simplicity....   [tags: Scientific method, Theory, Philosophy of science]

Strong Essays
1950 words (5.6 pages)

Hellenistic and Hellenic Interpretation of Popper Essay

- Hellenistic and Hellenic Interpretation of Popper Sir Karl Popper states in his treatise "Philosophy of Science: a Personal Report" asserts that "the criterion of the scientific status of a theory is its falsifiability, or refutability, or testability" (Popper 23). He claims that a 'good' scientific theory must meet a single requirement: its capability of being tested. In other words, a good theory predicts future observations, and the accuracy of the prediction supports or refutes it. If a theory can't be tested then it isn't scientific....   [tags: Scientific Theories Science Essays]

Free Essays
2385 words (6.8 pages)