Mary Cooper V Federal Case

763 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Caseanalysis

This assignment will cover a fictitious name of Mary Cooper a woman accused of harboring a fugitive, and illegal stolen equipment. The police attempted an illegal search and seizure in her home without a search warrant. This violates her Fourth Amendment rights. Cooper held that the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures require the exclusion of evidence found though an illegal search by state and local police officers, extending to the state a rule that previously applied onto to federal law enforcement. U.S. Federal Case The objective of this assignment is to bring into being, details and facts involved in a federal case against a fictitious criminal offender, name Mary Cooper. …show more content…

Nashville police department received information that a suspect in a car bombing case, as well as some illegal, stolen equipment, could be found in the home of Mary Cooper. A few law enforcement officers were dispatched to her home. The police officers went to Cooper’s home and asked for permission to enter the home, but Cooper refused, without a search warrant. Two officers left and two were still at the resident of Mrs. Cooper. A few hours later, the two police officers returned with more police officers, waving a piece of paper, and broke open the front door. Cooper asked to see the warrant and took it from the officer, putting it her pants. The police officers had a struggle with Cooper and took the piece of paper away from her. They handcuffed for being aggressively …show more content…

She based it on the First Amendment grounds, saying that she had the right to possess the materials. However, when the case reached the Supreme Court, her First Amendment claim was not addressed and instead threw out her conviction on other grounds, the Supreme Court stated that the evidence against her should have not been used because it was seized with a warrant and it’s in violation of the Fourth Amendment, the exclusionary rule. In Cooper’s case, the court held that the exclusionary rules are an “essential part” of the Fourth Amendment, and that the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause, which states that “No state shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law”, meaning that the federal exclusionary rule applies to the states. The exclusionary that is applied in the Federal courts should also be applied in State court

Show More
Related

  • Case Citation: Kentucky V. King 563 US

    720 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the Lexington, Kentucky a drug operation occurred at an apartment complex. Police officers of Lexington, Kentucky followed a suspected drug dealer into an apartment complex. The officers smelled marijuana outside the door of one of the apartments, as they knocked loudly the officers announced their presence. There were noises coming from the inside of the apartment; the officers believed that the noises were as the sound of destroying evidence. The officers stated that they were about to enter the apartment and kicked the apartment door in in order to save the save any evidence from being destroyed. Once the officer enters the apartment; there the respondent and others were found. The officers took the respondent and the other individuals that were in the apartment into custody. The King and the

    Read More

  • The Court Case: Mcculloch V. Maryland

    811 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the controversial court case, McCulloch v. Maryland, Chief Justice John Marshall’s verdict gave Congress the implied powers to carry out any laws they deemed to be “necessary and proper” to the state of the Union. In this 1819 court case, the state of Maryland tried to sue James McCulloch, a cashier at the Second Bank of the United States, for opening a branch in Baltimore. McCulloch refused to pay the tax and therefore the issue was brought before the courts; the decision would therefore change the way Americans viewed the Constitution to this day.

    Read More

  • Tennessee v. Garner 1985

    806 Words  | 2 Pages

    Facts:          On October 3, 1974, Memphis Police Officers Hymon and Wright were dispatched to answer a “prowler inside call.” When the police arrived at the scene, a neighbor gestured to the house where she had heard glass breaking and that someone was breaking into the house. While one of the officer radioed that they were on the scene, the other officer went to the rear of the house hearing a door slam and saw someone run across the backyard. The suspect, Edward Garner stopped at a 6-feet-high fence at the edge of the yard and proceeded to climb the fence as the police officer called out “police, halt.” The police officer figured that if Garner made it over the fence he would get away and also “figured” that Garner was unarmed. Officer Hymon then shot him, hitting him in the back of the head. In using deadly force to prevent the escape of Garner, Hymon used the argument that actions were made under the authority of the Tennessee statute and pursuant to Police Department policy. Although the department’s policy was slightly more restrictive than the statute it still allowed the use of deadly force in cases of burglary. Garner’s fathers’ argument was made that his son was shot unconstitutionally because he was captured and shot possessing ten dollars that he had stolen and being unarmed showing no threat of danger to the officer. The incident was then reviewed by the Memphis Police Firearm’s Revie...

    Read More

  • Arizona V. Hicks

    732 Words  | 2 Pages

    Also another fact one of the justices, Justice O’Connor disagreed with the outcome of the case. She said it was called a, “Cursory Inspection” she went on saying the officers could do the search based on reasonable suspicion that the object was evidence of a criminal activity.

    Read More

  • Adair v. U.S. and Coppage v. Kansas Analysis

    654 Words  | 2 Pages

    Adair v. U.S. and Coppage v. Kansas became two defining cases in the Lochner era, a period defined after the Supreme Court’s decision in Lochner v New York, where the court adopted a broad understanding of the due process clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment. In these cases the court used the substantive due process principle to determine whether a state statute or state’s policing power violated an individual’s freedom of contract. To gain a better understanding of the court’s reasoning it is essential to understand what they disregarded and how the rulings relate to the rulings in Plessy v. Ferguson, Lochner v. New York and Muller v. Oregon.

    Read More

  • Case Brief: McCulloch v. Maryland

    406 Words  | 1 Pages

    McCulloch v Maryland 4 Wheat. (17 U.S.) 316 (1819) Issue      May Congress charter a bank even though it is not an expressly granted power? Holding      Yes, Congress may charter a bank as an implied power under the “necessary and proper” clause. Rationale      The Constitution was created to correct the weaknesses of the Articles. The word “expressly” particularly caused major problems and therefore was omitted from the Constitution, because if everything in the Constitution had to be expressly stated it would weaken the power of the Federal government.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Fourth Amendment

    733 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are records of many cases that has created controversies over reasonable or unreasonable searches and seizures. As stated in the fourth amendment,

    Read More

  • Fourth Amendment Exceptions

    2959 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution states that people have the right “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,” but the issue at hand here is whether this also applies to the searches of open fields and of objects in plain view and whether the fourth amendment provides protection over these as well. In order to reaffirm the courts’ decision on this matter I will be relating their decisions in the cases of Oliver v. United States (1984), and California v. Greenwood (1988) which deal directly with the question of whether a person can have reasonable expectations of privacy as provided for in the fourth amendment with regards to objects in an open field or in plain view.

    Read More

  • Is Flag Burning Protected by the First Amendment?

    2205 Words  | 5 Pages

    Do the First and Fourth Amendments Protect?" Current Issues & Enduring Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking and Argument with Readings. Ed. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. 5th ed. Boston: Bedford/St Martin's, 1999. 316-324.

    Read More

  • Supreme Court Case Of Weeks V. United States Essay

    464 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the 1914 Supreme Court Case of Weeks v. United States, the defendant, Fremont Weeks, a resident of Kansas City, Missouri, was arrested by a police officer without a warrant. At the same time, other police officers entered Weeks’ home after using an extra key that a neighbor informed them of. Hoping to use any seized items as evidence, the police collected articles, documents, and letters from the bedroom of his house, also without a warrant. In a twice-denied petition, Weeks requested that his private items be returned to his home. Once the papers were introduced to the trial as evidence he objected once again to their presentation on the basis that they were obtained illegally through the unwarranted entering of his home, a violation of his Fourth Amendment rights, securing him from unreasonable searches and seizures conducted without warrants. After appealing to the Supreme Court, a unanimous decision concluded that the seizure of the items that were to be used as evidence in Weeks’ case directly violated his constitutional rights. This became the first application of the Exclusionary Rule to

    Read More

  • Capital Punishment Essay - Death Penalty and the Clash of Moral Ideologies

    1705 Words  | 4 Pages

    The final clause of the first section of the fourteenth amendment explains, "nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." 2   The 1976 ruling of Gregg v....

    Read More

  • Analysis of the 4th Amendment

    643 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Bill of Rights or the first 10 amendments to the Constitution was proposed to Congress in 1789 by James Madison in response to the Anti- Federalist movement that lobbied for an extended amount of rights that would further safeguard liberty. The 4th amendment in particular was drafted to acknowledge the abuse of the writ of assistance, a “search warrant” issued by the British government to search boats that were thought to contain smuggled material in Colonial America. The 4th amendment can be broken down into 3 parts: what activities are considered to be a “search” or a “seizure”; what is a probable cause for a “search” and “seizure” and finally, how violations should be dealt with. The evolution of the 4th amendment is long and tumultuous, starting from what it meant at time of drafting, to the controversy over different interpretations in modern times. Through all the controversies and the debate over the meaning of the 4th amendment, the essence is always the same: to protect man’s liberty.

    Read More

  • Warren Court Research Paper

    538 Words  | 2 Pages

    Ohio, the police didn’t have a search warrant to search for a suspect in crime that was related Ms. Dollre Mapp. When the police approached Ms. Mapp’s home, she demanded a warrant and they didn’t have one, so they showed her a phony warrant, which she then confiscated. When the police failed to find the suspect they started digging and they eventually found illegal obscene pornography, leading to her arrest on obscenity charges. She would then argue that the police had no right to come into her house and it. So Supreme Court takes the Fourth Amendment and create the “Exclusionary Rule”, stating that not only do you need a search warrant but if you it don’t, anything found cannot be used as evidence in a court of law. This essential becomes an expansion of civil rights liberties and protection from government

    Read More

  • The Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule

    791 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule has undergone a harsh and controversial development. This article not only critically analyzes the numerous alternatives and slight modifications to the exclusionary rule but the advanced by courts and commentators as well, (Schroeder, 1361). The article also puts emphasis on the alternative route of police policy making and a means to control official misconduct and violations of citizens rights. The exclusionary rule is one of the most significant defense stance of the fourth amendment. ITs establishment has created a wide spread of protection against violations of citizens rights.

    Read More

  • The Exclusionary Rule

    835 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Exclusionary rule requires that any evidence taken into custody be obtained by police using methods that violates an individual constitutional rights must be excluded from use in a criminal prosecution against that individual. This rule is judicially imposed and arose relatively recently in the development of the U.S. legal system. Under the common law, the seizure of evidence by illegal means did not affect its admission in court. Any evidence, however obtained, was admitted as long as it satisfied other evidentiary criteria for admissibility, such as relevance and trustworthiness. The exclusionary rule was developed in 1914 and applied to the case of Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383, and was limited to a prohibition on the use of evidence illegally obtain by federal law enforcement officers. Not until 1949, in the caw of Wolf v. Colorado, 38 U.S. 25, 27-28, did the U.S. Supreme Court take the first step toward applying the exclusionary rule to the states by ruling that the Fourth Amendment was applicable to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment which states: the security of one’s privacy against arbitrary intrusion by the police-which is at the core of the Fourth Amendment- is basic to a free society. It is therefore implicit in the “concept of ordered liberty” and as such enforceable against the States through the Due Process Clause.

    Read More

More about Mary Cooper V Federal Case

Open Document