Dp Case Study

832 Words2 Pages

DAP as the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) (2009) defines it is a framework of principles and guidelines for best practice in the care and education of young children, birth through age 8. It is grounded both in the research on how young children develop and learn and in what is known about education effectiveness. The principles and guidelines outline practice that promotes young children 's optimal learning and development. With the current philosophies within the field reflecting the ideas of post-modern thinking (Burman, 2008; MacDonald 2007; Mac Naughton, 2005) there has been a lot of questions surrounding DAP. Burman (2008) suggests that as educators we look closer at the theories surrounding development …show more content…

Cushner, McClelland, and Safford (2012) theorize the original DAP guidelines were insufficiently responsive to diverse cultures. When thinking of DAP and inclusion it is of importance to think of special needs. Inclusion is defined by Miller and Katz (2002) as a sense of belonging: feeling respected, valued for who you are; feeling a level of supportive energy and commitment from others so than you can do your best work. The ‘inclusive’ classroom often seems to be the classroom where children are all made to fit into what is normal and are all treated the same. The idea of inclusion has become the idea that the child who is different has to change to fit into a certain setting. It seems that people have forgotten that inclusion is a way of recognizing that all children are different and should be treated as such. When accepting DAP as the main theory in a classroom, teacher’s focused on what children can and cannot do. The child themselves is lost in what skills they have and what they are missing. Inclusion is lost when teachers are only focusing on skills and comparing children. With DAP being the main focus teachers can forget to reflect on their practice and on the children in their …show more content…

MacDonald argues that, there needs to be more critical thought around DAP. She lays out the history saying the field for too long “has accepted the status quo both in terms of our commitment to developmental theory and curriculum traditions without the benefit of deconstructing, problematizing and critically analyzing the underlying structures and power relationships that these ideas represent” (MacDonald, 2007). The writer agrees that as teachers we must look at our practice and find the tensions within our practice giving us a starting point with which to problematize our thinking. The idea of DAP reflects one cultural perspective, MacDonald (2007) points out the fascination that North Americans have with “performance, competition and individualism and the way that individual pursuits are valued in many instances over collective

Open Document