Analysis Of Atlas Shrugged

1402 Words3 Pages

Taylor Burns

The Government’s Grasp

Atlas Shrugged tells the story of a failing United States economy, characterized by strict government regulation and the sudden disappearance of many of the country’s most influential industrialists. Through this setting, along with a mysterious strike lead by John Galt, the movie’s message becomes clear; to promote a laissez-faire economy that cultivates individual achievement, and denounce one dominated by political bosses and corruption.
As early as the opening scene, Atlas Shrugged reveals the crisis that the country is facing, foreshadowing the result of intense government regulation. The news is broadcasting stock values dropping dramatically, leaving major businesses and traders in a panic. Furthermore, conflicts in the east have called for a halt in oil imports to the United States, spiking gas prices to a historical high.
Atlas Shrugged is told through the eyes of Dagny Taggard, the movie’s protagonist. Dagny is the Vice President of Taggard Transcontinental, a family-run railroad company that she operates alongside her brother Jim. Taggard Transcontinental’s railroads are old and derailing, posing a major threat to the company’s future. Considering rail is now the most common form of transportation due to its affordability, this is a major issue for the country. In an attempt to save the family business and prevent future derailments, Dagny decides to reline her rails with Rearden Steel, a new metal created by Hank Rearden. She is convinced the metal is tougher, lighter, and cheaper than other steels.
When Dagny goes to Hank’s office to negotiate a partnership, it becomes evident that the government is attempting to regulate Rearden Metal. Hank is shown sorting though lette...

... middle of paper ...

... and today’s government would not be able to get away with ignoring such a catastrophe without appearing suspicious. Furthermore, due to the democratic system that the United States has developed, it is unlikely that the regulations in Atlas Shrugged would pass. However, if such laws were to pass, the United States allows its people to bring their arguments to court, where they are given the platform to contest their concerns and bring forth rightful behavior and change.
I do not think that there is a difference in the likelihood of the events happening between today and ten years from now. The United States has already established a stable system that it operates on, which was created centuries ago. If anything, I think that it would be less likely that the government has corrupt relationships with businesses in the future, as the country is only progressing.

Open Document