March 19, 2015
Alan Goldman argues that medical paternalism is unjustified except in very rare cases. He states that disregarding patient autonomy, forcing patients to undergo procedures, and withholding important information regarding diagnoses and medical procedures is morally wrong. Goldman argues that it is more important to allow patients to have the ability to make autonomous decisions with their health and what treatment options if any they want to pursue. He argues that medical professionals must respect patient autonomy regardless of the results that may or may not be beneficial to a patient’s health. I will both offer an objection and support Goldman’s argument. I will argue that while medical professionals have an obligation to promote patient autonomy but are not required to base their knowledge solely on morality. There is a level of obligation for medical professionals to promote a patients health and well-being when patients are not fully autonomous.
Goldman’s argument state that medical professionals have an obligation to both respect patient autonomy and promote patient well-being. He states that when medical knowledge and a patient’s autonomy come into conflict there is a moral obligation for medical professionals to respect patient’s wishes. With this being said, Goldman states that medical paternalism is unjustified even if a treatment can save or extend the life of a patient.
I do not believe that Allan Goldman’s argument is able to cover some important details that can be said to refute his argument. While Goldman’s argument provides excellent moral reasoning from a patient’s standpoint of view, it fails to fully detail the reasoning of paternalis...
... middle of paper ...
...tonomy. There are fine lines for respecting autonomy, morality, and the professional care of a patient.
I do not think Allan Goldman has a concretely valid argument. Not all cases is patient autonomy the most important thing to respect and honor. There will always be situations where Medical paternalism is justified. Justifiable paternalism in a medical perspective is prolonging patients’ lives allowing them to exercise their autonomy. Failing to respect a patient’s treatment requests or denials is a violation of the autonomy at that point in time during their illness. While the previous statement is true, the medical professional is violating a patient’s future autonomy. For this reason, medical professionals have the right to act paternalistically, therefore medical paternalism is justified by means of future autonomy and obligations to promote patient well-being.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- “Being admitted to the profession of veterinary medicine, I solemnly swear to use my scientific knowledge and skills for the benefit of society through the protection of animal health and welfare, the prevention and relief of animal suffering, the conservation of animal resources, the promotion of public health, and the advancement of medical knowledge. I will practice my profession conscientiously, with dignity, and in keeping with the principles of veterinary medical ethics. I accept as a lifelong obligation the continual improvement of my professional knowledge and competence.” (The Veterinary’s Oath).... [tags: Veterinary medicine, Medicine, Veterinarian]
1202 words (3.4 pages)
- Austin Eby Medical Ethics Andrew Erickson March 19, 2015 Medical Paternalism Alan Goldman argues that medical paternalism is unjustified except in very rare cases. He states that disregarding patient autonomy, forcing patients to undergo procedures, and withholding important information regarding diagnoses and medical procedures is morally wrong. Goldman argues that it is more important to allow patients to have the ability to make autonomous decisions with their health and what treatment options if any they want to pursue.... [tags: Patient, Health care, Morality]
780 words (2.2 pages)
- Although modern medicine has become increasingly innovative, the ethics of medical practice are a commonly debated topic in the world of medicine. A particularly difficult situation to ethically work through would be the argument on physician assisted suicide, also known as active euthanasia. Assisted suicide involves a patient who consults a physician to obtain a drug prescription or knowledge of a lethal dosage when the physician is aware of the intent of the patient to kill oneself. In modern times, the Hippocratic Oath is able to provide a valuable view that does not condone physician assisted suicide from an ethical standpoint.... [tags: Medicine, Physician, Suicide, Medical ethics]
1069 words (3.1 pages)
- It is stated directly in the Hippocratic Oath, a promise made by every physician, “I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel” (Lasagna 1). Euthanasia is the practice in which physicians administer a lethal dose of drugs, commonly pentobarbital or sodium thiopental, to a patient. Patients either request this procedure, due to a terminal illness, or their family may request it if the patient is in a coma or is in a paralyzed state. Euthanasia dates back thousands of years, but recently, its ethics have been heavily debated.... [tags: Medicine, Medical ethics, Health care]
2311 words (6.6 pages)
- Problem viewing it as medical treatment The previous section outlined how the interpretation or the understanding of the Hippocratic Oath provides arguments for and against Euthanasia being considered medical care. However, I find that the Oath, even if not taken literally, shapes a special ethic in medicine that should continue to be upheld. The spirit of the Oath, as mentioned earlier, offers to patients a sense of what they expect from their physicians- ultimate care. It took years to form the long-standing ethical norms in the patient-physician relationship and allowing physicians to euthanize patients threatens this central norm.... [tags: Medicine, Medical ethics, Physician, Patient]
1246 words (3.6 pages)
- THE ANA CODE OF ETHICS The first provision of the American Nurses Association’s (ANA) “Code of Ethics” states, “ The nurse, in all professional relationships, practices with compassion and respect for the inherent dignity, worth and uniqueness of every individual, unrestricted by considerations of social or economic status, personal attributes, or the nature of health problems.” The second provision states, “The nurse’s primary commitment is the patient, whether the patient is an individual, family, group, or community” (Fowler, 2010).... [tags: Medicine, Medical ethics, Health care provider]
918 words (2.6 pages)
- Patient dumping when a hospital capable of providing the essential medical care for a patient, but turns the patient away because of the patient 's failure to pay for services. Patient dumping is some steps taking by hospitals due to lack of financial ability of the patient either expelled or not provide the services he needs. Before some hospitals not even greeted before making sure that health care insurance was available or not. However, in 1986 The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act to stop hospitals from turning away patients with emergency medical situations, even if they were uninsured.... [tags: Medicine, Ethics, Health care, Medical ethics]
1138 words (3.3 pages)
- In this book, a collection of ten stories about the medicine drama in real life are presented. The stories are filled with extremely agonizing decisions that patients and their family members confront. In contrast to the wooden and rigid cases found in text-book scenarios representing the literature of medical ethics, the individuals who are involved in these crucial moments of ethically charged decisions come to life. The characters and the settings they encounter are enriched and vivid. These compelling stories bring up ethical issues that range from parents faced with donating the organs of their daughter, who had traumatic brain damage; to a young woman's decision to refuse her last the... [tags: medical ethics, medicine drama]
890 words (2.5 pages)
- Ethical Issues Autonomy – The ideal of self-determination is the basis for autonomy. It is important that a patient be allowed to decide what should be done to his or her own body. In other words, nobody else has the right to assert their power over another. Likewise, a physician should be allowed to decide not to perform a procedure if doing so would conflict with his or her values. In the Cruzan case, Nancy’s autonomy by way of her parents’ substituted judgment was overridden in favor of the State of Missouri’s policy to preserve life.... [tags: Medical Medicine Ethics Essays]
1561 words (4.5 pages)
- The Case of Nancy Cruzan Importance The case of Nancy Cruzan has become one of the landmark cases for withdrawal of artificial nutrition and hydration because of important ethical issues the case brings to light. At the time of the case, the United States Supreme Court had already established the right of an individual to refuse medical treatment. This issue therefore is not novel to the Cruzan case. Furthermore, there was not any controversy over who was the appropriate decision maker for Nancy Cruzan.... [tags: Ethics Medical Medicine Essays]
1129 words (3.2 pages)
- A Brief Note On Unemployment And Its Effects On America
- Academic Cheating Is The Best Predictor Of Future Behavior
- Asian Tigers : The Highly Free Developed
- Effects Of Sugar Cane On The Country Of The United States
- Donahue Community Health Promotion : Donahue
- Analysis Of Little Women By Louisa May Alcott