Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rawls' idea of distributive justice
An Essay On Utilitarianism
Rawls' idea of distributive justice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Rawls' idea of distributive justice
JOHN RAWLS – THE LIFE AND MIND
Contemporary philosopher John Bordley Rawls provided the liberal world with an ethical theory that placed the concept of justice at its center of concentration. John Rawls was arguably one of the most influential political philosophers of the Twentieth Century following the Second World War. Rawls published his first book, “A Theory of Justice”, in 1971, which was widely considered his best work and the most important work of political philosophy. Rawlsianism, Rawls’ philosophical basis, aimed at challenging utilitarian principles and it therefore received both strong support and strong opposition.2
Biographical Sketch
John Rawls was born into a comfortable family in Baltimore, Maryland where he attended school until graduation.1 Rawls studied at Princeton University and was soon drafted into the United States Army as an infantryman.2 After turning down a position as an officer, Rawls returned to Princeton where he received a doctorate of philosophy in 1949.2 After teaching and studying at Princeton University, Cornell, and MIT, he decided to take a position teaching philosophy at Harvard where he taught until 1990.1 Despite his intellectual fame, Rawls lived a withdrawn life as a family man and academic instead of a public intellectual.2 John Rawls brought the study of political theory back to the headlines of academic institutions around the world.
I. The Basic Structure of Society
The primary social goods proposed by Rawls are (1) rights and liberties, (2) opportunities and powers, and (3) income and wealth, that any reasonable person would want more of rather than less. Rawls believes that we have a right to these goods and it is the collective responsibility of the commun...
... middle of paper ...
...ert Cavalier, and Charles Ess. "A Theory of Justice (1971)." John Rawls. http://caae.phil.cmu.edu/cavalier/Forum/meta/background/Rawls.html (accessed February 18, 2014).
Nussbaum, Martha. "A Theory of Justice, by John Rawls." The Enduring Significance of John Rawls. http://www.ohio.edu/people/piccard/entropy/rawls.html (accessed February 16, 2014).
"Philosophers.co.uk." John Rawls. http://www.philosophers.co.uk/john-rawls.html (accessed February 18, 2014).
"Rawlsian." European Business Ethics Network Ireland. http://ebeni.wordpress.com/decisions/theories/duty/contract/rawlsian/ (accessed February 18, 2014).
"Rawlsian Ethics." Regis University.
http://rhchp.regis.edu/hce/ethicsataglance/RawlsianEthics/RawlsianEthics_01.html (accessed February 18, 2014).
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University
Press, 1971. Print.
In the aforementioned passage from her document “John Rawls on Justice” Ada Maria Isasi-Diaz’s sheds light on the major flaw in John’s Rawls’s “social contract theory” for establishing “Justice” in our society. She asserts
Morgan, Michael L., ed. Classics of Moral and Political Theory. 3rd Edition. Indianapolis. Hackett, 2001.
Hulbert, M. A. (2011). Pursuing justice: An introduction to justice studies. Black Point, Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing.
Schall, J. D. (2004). Does the "Social Contract" Theory Present a Valid Reason for Felon Disenfranchisement? Retrieved from The Sentencing Project: http://www.sentencingproject.org/template/index.cfm
Sellin, Thorsten. "Race Prejudice in the Administration of Justice." American Journal of Sociology 41.2 (1935): 212. Print.
I will begin this paper by making clear that this is a critique of Rawls and his difference principle and not an attempt at a neutral analysis. I have read the Theory of Justice and I have found it wanting in both scope and realism. The difference principle proposed by Rawls, his second principle is the focus of my critique. While this paper will not focus solely on the second principle, all analysis done within this essay are all targeted towards the scope of influence that Rawls treats the second principle with.
Hobson, Charles F. The Great Chief Justice, John Marshall And the Rule Of Law. University Press Of Kansas: Wison Garey McWilliams & Lance Banning, 1996.
Rawls creates a hypothetical society, via a thought experiment known as the “Veil of Ignorance,” in which all that you knew of yourself is eliminated from your mind to allow you to come to a rational decision on how you would like your society to be organized. Rawls principle is that under a social contract what is right must be the same for everyone. The essence of Rawls' “veil of ignorance” is that it is designed to be a representation of persons purely in their capacity as free and equal moral persons. Out of this experiment Rawls provides us with two basic p...
Katherine Beckett & Theodore Sasson. (2000). The Politics of Injustice: Crime and Punishment in America.
Abadinsky, Howard. Law and Justice: An Introduction to the American Legal System. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2008. Print.
The social contract theory of John Rawls challenges utilitarianism by pointing out the impracticality of the theory. Mainly, in a society of utilitarians, a citizens rights could be completely ignored if injustice to this one citizen would benefit the rest of society. Rawls believes that a social contract theory, similar those proposed by Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau, would be a more logical solution to the question of fairness in any government. Social contract theory in general and including the views of Rawls, is such that in a situation where a society is established of people who are self interested, rational, and equal, the rules of justice are established by what is mutually acceptable and agreed upon by all the people therein. This scenario of negotiating the laws of that society that will be commonly agreed upon and beneficial to all is what Rawls terms "The Original Position and Justification".
To conclude, Rawls’ strengths lie in his focus on the individual, protection of liberties, and equal opportunity which supports a healthy society. The criticisms of his theory include a question as to what is best for society as a whole, dismissal of beneficial inequalities and the potential for society to develop its own code of ethics as it has in reality. These criticisms, however, do not stand up to careful examination, and it is my opinion that John Rawls’ principles are in good standing.
John Rawls and Robert Nozick both provide compelling and thought provoking theories regarding the values of liberty and equality. Rawls focuses on both liberty and equality while Nozick theorizes exclusively on liberty. The ideas of Rawls and Nozick have multiple strengths as well as weaknesses which allow for debate and comparison between the two theories.
The conception of justice in western philosophy through the work of John Rawls and comparison with Immanuel Kant’s Notion of justice
Political philosopher John Rawls believed that in order for society to function properly, there needs to be a social contract, which defines ‘justice as fairness’. Rawls believed that the social contract be created from an original position in which everyone decides on the rules for society behind a veil of ignorance. In this essay, it will be argued that the veil of ignorance is an important feature of the original position. First, the essay will describe what the veil of ignorance is. Secondly, it will look at what Rawls means by the original position. Thirdly, it will look at why the veil of ignorance is an important feature of the original position. Finally, the essay will present a criticism to the veil of ignorance and the original position and Rawls’ potential response to this.