Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Downfall of tsar nicholas ii
Downfall of tsar nicholas ii
Downfall of tsar nicholas ii
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Downfall of tsar nicholas ii
Nicholas II was the Last Tsar of Russia, remembered for the tragic and thoughtless way in which he and his family were murdered. He is responsible for the events that occurred during his reign, such as Bloody Sunday and the 1905 Revolution, yet there is little recognition of the love and devotion he had for his family. It is not discussed about the medical condition of his only son, the talents of his daughters, and the support of his wife. Is it possible that despite the economic downturn that Nicholas put Russia in that he still had a wide range of supporters? In addition to all the lives that were lost during his reign, it is also most tragic the manner in which this family met their end and what little regard there was to them as human beings. Nicholas II Nicholas II, born in 1868 as Nikolay Alexandrovich Romanov, was the son of Emperor Alexander III and Empress Maria Feodorvna of Russia, who was the former Princess Damar of Denmark, and was the grandson of royalty from Russia and Denmark on his maternal and paternal sides.1 He married to Queen Victoria’s granddaughter, Alexandra of Hesse-Darmstadt. Part of the engagement included a stipulation that Alexandra convert her faith from Lutheranism to Russian Orthodox2, a requirement that made her reluctant to accept his proposal at first. However, after granting her an exception that would allow her to convert to Russian Orthodox without having to renounce her Lutheran faith, she accepted and took the name of Alexandra Fedrovna in an attempt to become more acceptable to the Russian people.3 Becoming Tsar of Russia When Nicholas’s father died at the early age of 49 from liver disease on October 20, 1894, that made him heir to the throne at only 26 years old, a ro... ... middle of paper ... ...: Pomp, Power, and Pageantry in the Reign of Nicholas II," Hoboken, NJ. John Wiley & Sons, 2006) 3) Massie, Robert K. “Nicholas and Alexandra” (Michigan; Ballatine Books, reprinted 2000). 4) Ferro, Mark and Pearce, Brian. “Nicholas II: Last of the Tsars” (Viking, UK; Penguin Book Limited, 1994). 5) Trewin, J.C., “The House of Special Purpose: An Intimate Portrait of the Last Days of the Russian Imperial Family" From the papers and photographs of Charles Sydney Gibbes. (Chicago, IL. Stein and Day, 1975). 6) CNN World. “DNA Proves Bolsheviks killed all of Russian Czar’s Children” (Atlanta, GA. CNN, Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. March 2009). 7) Maugh, Thomas H. III. “DNA Testing Ends Mystery Surrounding Czar Nicholas II Children” (Los Angeles, CA. Los Angeles Times, March 2009) http://articles.latimes.com/2009/mar/11/science/sci-romanov11
Moss, W., 2014. A History of Russia Volume 2: Since 1855. 1st ed. London, England: Anthem Press London, pp.112-113.
Nicholas II ruled Russia from 1894-1917 and was to be its final tsar. He ascended the throne under the impression that he would rule his whole life as it's undisputed leader. Accompanied by his wife, Alexandra, they lived a comfortable life of luxury while the country suffered around them. Nicholas was determined to rule as harshly as his father; however, he was a very weak and incompetent character who did not posses the qualities capable of guiding Russia through its time of turmoil.
I can use this source in my research project to defend why Czar Nicholas II is innocent to the abuse of power of the office of Czar.It reveales to me that even thouch Nicholas struggled with being the new Czar he truly did a lot for Russia to improve in learning abilities.Above all else, Nicholas loved Russia first and then his family; He thought the fate of the two was inseparable. No one knew the fault of the Romanov Dynasty better than him. Czar Nicholas sincerely felt his responsibility for the country, He thought that his destiny was within the country he ruled. I think it was really difficult for him but it was the only way to admit his mistakes and to say "sorry" to his people.
On July 16, 1918, the Russian imperial family, the Romanovs, were executed in the basement of the Ipatiev House by the Bolshevik political party. While The Kitchen Boy, by Robert Alexander, follows the point of view of the family’s young kitchen boy during this event, along with a different possible ending to history, it also follows the boy through the poor treatment of the royal family long before they were killed. During their stay in the House of Special Purpose under control of the Bolsheviks, the Romanov family endured physical, psychological, and spiritual mistreatments.
Rasputin’s loyalty to the czar and his family made him “immune” to the attempts of exile from Russia (DISCovering). Aleksey Nickolayevich was a hemophiliac (Rasputin). On one certain occasion, doctors were called in to check on the young heir. After nothing seemed to help, “Grigory Rasputin, who was reported to have miraculous powers of faith healing, was brought to Alexandra” (Massie 259). Rasputin didn’t cure Aleksey of hemophilia, but his ability to control the symptoms was “indisputable” (Fuhrmann 26). “In December 1916, a group of conservative aristocrats laced Rasputin’s wine with potassium cyanide at a soiree in the Yousoupov Palace” (DISCovering). The poison wasn’t strong enough to kill Rasputin. He was shot once, “lurched” at his attackers and they shot him again (DISCovering).
Sack, Arkady J., “The Birth of the Russian Democracy”. New York city, Russian information bureau. 1918.
Certain aspects of Tsar Nicholas 2's behaviour definitely contributed to bringing about the fall of the Russian Empire, however most of these qualities were not weaknesses in character as such, they were qualities we would associate with poor leadership. When we say 'weakness in character' we mean being easily influenced/controlled by others. Nicholas himself was a firm believer in autocracy; he was virtually unmovable in this belief. And this obstinant belief clearly illustrates he stuck to his beliefs, although in his early years as tsar his uncles had huge influence. That said, the fall of the Russian Empire was not all a result of Nicholas' character and poor leadership qualities, we must also see that the huge socio-economic changes happening as well as the outbreak WW1 hugely influenced the coming about of and the timing of the revolution. These changes would be hard for any government to manage.
Nicholas I and Nicholas II both struggled with similar uncertainties of a possible revolution. Both came to a conclusion with a strong resemblance, and yet at the same time remained drastically different when their rule ended. While the names may suggest that Nicholas I was the father of Nicholas II, Nicholas I was actually Nicholas II’s great granduncle. The summarized history of their terms below will tell of and compare the Nicholas’ reigns of the Russian monarchy.
Alexander who died in 1894 had left Russia with a society no longer controlled by tsarist rule and when Nicholas took the throne after his father's death Russian society was not prepared to turn on it's heels and return to how it use to be . Nicholas II was 26 when his father died and was soon to marry the German princess, Alix of Hess, Granddaughter of Queen Victoria .
Wood, A. (1986). The Russian Revolution. Seminar Studies in History. (2) Longman, p 1-98. ISBSN 0582355591, 9780582355590
A key historiographical debate surrounding Nicholas II’s abdication is whether or not the abdication itself was meant to end the monarchy. Nicholas himself
1) Adams, Arthur E. The Russian Revolution and Bolshevik Victory: Why and How? Boston: D.C. Heath and Company, 1960.
Tsar Nicholas II was the last tsar of Russia. He was born in Pushkin, Saint Petersburg, Russia on May 6, 1868 and would live to reach the age of 50. His actions during his rule could be credited to the rise of communism in Russia, and opposition of him led to his forced abdication in 1917. Because of his significance during his reign, Nicholas is also represented in the novel Animal Farm by a farmer named Mr. Jones, as this character symbolizes Nicholas’s non qualification for ruling, as well as how he plunged his country into devastating poverty and eventually fell out of rule.
Riasanovsky, Nicholas V., and Mark D. Steinberg. A History of Russia. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford, 2005. Print.