Adam Smith vs. Karl Marx
Both Karl Marx and Adam Smith were greatly respected economists during the 18th and 19th centuries. They both viewed society, the economy and politics in different ways. Smith viewed capitalism and the free market as a necessity to society while Marx believed that the bourgeoisie and the proletariat were the two classes that would constantly be fighting between each other. Marx believes that the government needs to intervene to help the working class and that the class system needs to be taken down completely. Some people still argue about which view is correct, but both Smith’s and Marx’s theories can be seen and compared with business and many other aspects of society today.
One of Smith’s main points in his theory is that the government should have a “laissez-faire” approach to the economy. He says this because Smith believes that competition will lead to thriving business and producers and consumers will put their money back into the economy. He supports his claim by citing the “invisible hand” as a sort of guide for the free market. “The invisible hand” is a metaphor for the actions in a free market that benefits the economy. According to Smith, this invisible hand shows its strength and helps society out when people are using their own personal effort to get to the top and to boost their own wealth in the economy. There are many examples of the invisible hand at work. Businesses are constantly competing with each other to attract customers. This results in one business lowering prices enough to attract consumers. This benefits the consumer because now they can purchase the good or service for a cheaper price and also buy a product that wil...
... middle of paper ...
...le would have nobody to blame but themselves if their finances or happiness was not where they wanted them to be. With Marxism the people know exactly where to point their fingers and who to blame if society went down.
Overall, Smith seems to have the more prevalent and trusted belief about economics and society today. Capitalism has been seen to create great things and open up so many opportunities for the working class people. If we lived under a Marxist system throughout history, some argue that we would be way behind where we are now in terms of production and technology. Adam Smith’s theory and his belief in social Darwinism has taken the U.S economy to not so great places. However, there has never been a utopia or a perfect economy but Smith was right in assuming that his view on the economy gave everyone the best shot to be prosperous in a cutthroat society.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- ... A new innovation would result in a short-term profit for the undertaker. The profits emerge from the innovator being the only producer and distributor of the product, for a time they have a monopoly on the market. Soon other businesses take notice of the success of the product; in response they create an imitation of the original product, sometimes an improved version, sometimes a cheaper version. Either way, imitations result in increased competition because several businesses are trying to produce the same good.... [tags: Economics, Capitalism, Adam Smith, Karl Marx]
737 words (2.1 pages)
- As far back as man has been on earth, he has been driven towards building a community among his peers. Whether that is a community of hunters and gatherers who share whatever the day has brought to them within their tribe, or a larger community which within its structure lie the inner dwellings of division of labor and societal classes. Adam Smith (18th Century), John Stuart Mill (19th Century), and Karl Marx (19th Century) are of the same cloth, but in modern terms their community is referenced as a government, and they each have their own distinct opinions on the 'drive' instilled within human nature that shape their personal economic theories.... [tags: Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, Karl Marx]
1775 words (5.1 pages)
- Many historical figures have different views on how a country should be governed. Two in particular are Karl Marx and Adam Smith. Both men are best known for their opinions on how a country’s economy ought to be run. Adam Smith believes in capitalism, while Karl Marx would rather have a socialist economy. They expressed entirely new ideas that nations still follow today. These two men have completely different views on the class system, economy, and government of a nation. Adam Smith was a Scottish economist and is known as the “father of modern economics”.... [tags: Marxism, Socialism, Capitalism, Karl Marx]
1015 words (2.9 pages)
- Business and Society Ryan Malloy Adam Smith vs. Karl Marx Professor Kushner 9/17/15 Both Karl Marx and Adam Smith were greatly respected economists during the 18th and 19th centuries. They both viewed society, the economy and politics in different ways. Smith viewed capitalism and the free market as a necessity to society while Marx believed that the bourgeoisie and the proletariat were the two classes that would constantly be fighting between each other. Marx believes that the government needs to intervene to help the working class and that the class system needs to be taken down completely.... [tags: Marxism, Working class, Karl Marx, Socialism]
1095 words (3.1 pages)
- ... Smith goes on further to explain the importance of education and how it is essential to our society, that in order to improve a certain trade there is a certain level of education required. However, there’s inequality between the common people and the privileged, “It is otherwise with the common people. They have little time to spare for education. Their parents can scarce afford to maintain them even in infancy. As soon as they are able to work they must apply to some trade by which they can earn their subsistence,” (Smith, 276) The common people, being the of the poor and middle class, cannot afford education like those of the upper class.... [tags: Karl Marx, Capitalism, Jean-Jacques Rousseau]
855 words (2.4 pages)
- Karl Marx and Adam Smith Karl Marx and Adam Smith wrote in the same time period – during the industrial revolution, where the bourgeois had risen to power by oppressing and exploiting the proletariat. The term bourgeois refers to the people in the class of modern capitalists, owners of the means of social production and employers of wage labor. The proletarians are the people in the class of modern wage laborers who, having no means of production of their own, are reduced to selling their labor power in order to live.... [tags: Papers]
1390 words (4 pages)
- Comparing Adam Smith and Karl Marx Smith and Marx agree upon the importance of capitalism as unleashing productive powers. Capitalism is born out of the division of labour... that is, it is made possible by dividing jobs up into simple tasks as a way of increasing efficiency. By increasing efficiency, then everyone can produce more than they personally need. The extra produced can go towards the accumulation of capital, (machines, more land, more tools, etc) which will allow for even more increased efficiency and production.... [tags: Politics Political Essays]
562 words (1.6 pages)
- Durkheim: What makes society progressive is the growth of a nation towards the better. What makes a nation powerful and grow is the division of labor. It has been apparent over the centuries of technological growth that within a society the more societal advancements there are, the more division of labor there is within the nation. Durkheim considered the division of labor has a natural law, one that not only was in humans but all organisms. Durkheim felt that although everything should be divided into his or her own labor, it was all for the greater good, the social solidarity.... [tags: society, social solidarity, nation]
659 words (1.9 pages)
- The task of political economy, Marx argued, was to understand all the presumptions within productive and social relations which made social life in a given form possible at a particular time.(Peterson,17). In some nations, as Hobbes states, the lives of the poor are "nasty,brutish and short", by contrast in other nations , the poor do better within same levels of wealth. The aim of political economy is to understand the processes that produce these differences. The two historical figures that analyzed capitalism were A.Smith and K.Marx.... [tags: Economics Political Economy Capitalism]
1265 words (3.6 pages)
- Adam Smith v. Karl Marx Being reared in the typical capitalist community in the United States, it is much easier for me to relate to the thoughts of Adam Smith. This is not to say that I do not agree with some of the precepts of pure Communism, but like the old adage says, "Communism looks good on paper, but in practice, it is completely ineffective." Historically, this form of government does not tend to succeed because of many factors. Some of these include basic economic differences, individualism, and technology and how it advances or serves as a detriment to the state.... [tags: Papers Capitalism Communism Essays]
2228 words (6.4 pages)
- Globalization Of Gangs And The United States
- Improving Health Conditions Of Indonesia
- My Building Principal And An Experienced Teacher Who I Consider A Mentor
- Analysis Of The Article ' Water Policy During The United States ' A Perspective '
- Evaluating A Nursing Care Plan Based On The Information Shared From Previous Interviews
- I Am An Introvert And Self Concept Is The Sum Total Of Beliefs That A Person