Socrates Reflection Paper

742 Words2 Pages

Evil, in the terms of my discussion can be said to be the worst possible outcome, or at least, the not so desired one. And good being vice versa. Some may ask that people do not always desire for the best things, but for my definition, the desired outcome goes farther to include those outside and within the actions immediate effects. For example, 10 people in a room and one shouts, then those people hear and are affected by the shout, but those outside are not, in any direct way, affected. If a child spills milk then he has, to some extent, committed the less desired outcome, but in doing the evil, the child has the chance to learn from his mistakes. While if someone else spills the child 's milk, then what could the child learn that he could not find out by spilling it himself? The child has the opportunity to learn numerous from …show more content…

Socrates argues for the existence of an eternal soul, and that our soul knows, and teachers only reteach what we forgot. I do not agree with his stance on human education, because if the sole is eternal, then why are there more soles in the world today than yesterday? Have those soles always existed or perhaps waited in a line to inhabit a body? Perhaps this is true, but if so then that line would need to be infinite otherwise the world will run out of soles eventually, or if it is infinite where does the knowledge they possess come from? And if neither of these arguments seem logical, then how could a sole have knowledge of sciences and inventions of things that never existed. An argument against this is that the world is eternal, but then the universe is a loop, and this question has already been asked and answered, and my argument becomes pointless. That is why I do not accept Socrates’s statement that the soul already knows everything, and is being

Open Document