Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of the Affordable Care Act on healthcare
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of the Affordable Care Act on healthcare
In the early 1900s having insurance was inconsequential, health care was relatively affordable and when the general population needed to go to the hospital, the hospital had an affordable payment plan. However, as insurance companies were being implemented, the United States was experiencing an increase of expenditure in medical care and the population was experiencing a longer life expectancy due to the medical advancements that was being made. During this time the population over the age of 65 as well as the indigent population was finding it hard to find medical coverage whether it was because insurance companies did not want the high risk of the elderly population or people were unable to afford the premiums. President Theodore Roosevelt …show more content…
According to The Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation (2015), the historical trend of Medicare between the years of 1969 and 2013 grew at an average annual rate of 7.5 percent which was slower than the 9.1 percent growth rate of private insurance spending per enrollee. In addition, The Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation (2015), also states that in the last five years, Medicare spending has decreased compared to the previous decade at an average 4.1 percent between the years of 2010 to 2014 with a rate of 4.1 percent, from 2000 to 2010 the average rate was documented at 9 percent. Moreover, the spending per beneficiary has also decreased from 7 percent in 2000 to 2010 to 1 percent from 2010 to 2014 (The Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation, 2015). The Congressional Budget Office, states that spending per beneficiary equates to approximately 1,200 dollars per person and decreases can be contributed to the ACA being implemented (The Henry J Kaiser Family Foundation, 2015). With the application of the ACA, the health care industry has had the ability to introduce various delivery systems that have had an impact on decreasing expenditure with Medicare …show more content…
The biggest concern is whether Medicare will have the ability to sustain itself. Medicare has recently celebrated 50 years in 2015, and as our society is learning, Medicare has outpaced inflation, growth in the general economy, as well as growth in the federal budget (Moffit, 2016). The fact of the matter is that there were 77 million American born during the years of 1946-1964 which equates to about 10,000 people per day are turning 65 everyday (Moffit, 2016). Many policymakers suggests that Medicare by the year 2040, Medicare will reach a 5.8 percent gross domestic product (GDP), and in 2087 it will reach anywhere between 6.5 percent to 9.8 percent depending on future cost savings, productivity gains and limits on spending (Hensley, 2013). However, there are other policymakers that suggest Medicare is never going bankrupt because the ACA has had the ability to help curve spending for Medicare (Van de Water, 2016). Van de Water (2016), states that Part A will remain solvent with the ability to pay one hundred percent of hospital bills by the contribution of raising revenues and by the slowing the growth of costs to at least 2028. In addition, Van de Water (2016), states Part B will have the ability to remain solvent with the contributions of beneficiary premiums and general revenue. The opposing side argues that there is a decline in workers in the workforce that by 2030 there will be 2.4 workers for every person on
In the 1800’s, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Belgium, among others, began to establish “socialized insurance policies” and medical care, which are still in effect today, while at the same time, the United States began to furthe...
Membership Services (MSD) at Kaiser Permanente used to be a modest department of sixty staff. However, over the past few years the department has doubled in size, creating minor departmental reorganization. In addition the increase of departmental staffing, several challenges became apparent. The changes included primary job function, as well as the introduction of new network system software which slowed down the processes of other departments. These departments included Claims (who pay the bills for service providers outside of the Kaiser Permanente network), and Patient Business Services (who send invoices to members for services received within Kaiser Permanente). Due to the unforeseen challenges created by the system upgrade, it was decided that MSD would process the calls for both of the affected departments. Unfortunately, this created a catastrophic event of MSD receiving numerous phone calls from upset members—who had received bills a year after the service had been provided. The average Monday call volume had risen from 1,800 to 2,600 calls per day. The average handling time for each phone call had risen as well—from an acceptable standard of 5.6 minutes to an unfavorable 7.2 minutes. The department continued to be kept inundated with these types of calls for the two years that these changes have been effect.
Many pivotal events over the last century have brought our healthcare system to where it is today. Some were indirect, such as World War II (and how it led to direct events such as medical advances that shifted focus from critical care and managing contagion to preventive medicine and health insurance as an employee benefit) and the internet (which has provided a wealth of tools and resources that were once only available to healthcare providers and has served to foster technological advancements such as Electronic Health Records and telemedicine). Others were targeted interventions, such as the Hill-Burton Act, which was enacted in 1946 and provided infrastructure dollars to healthcare facilities that agreed to provide a significant volume of free or reduced cost services to those with limited ability to pay (HRSA, 2014). Perhaps the most influential targeted event was the passage of Medicare and Medicaid programs, which was the point at which the government became the administrator for insurance programs for the poor, creating a system that would continuously grow and impact service delivery through regulatory control.
For decades, one of the many externalities that the government is trying to solve is the rising costs of healthcare. "Rising healthcare costs have hurt American competitiveness, forced too many families into bankruptcy to get their families the care they need, and driven up our nation's long-term deficit" ("Deficit-Reducing Healthcare Reform," 2014). The United States national government plays a major role in organizing, overseeing, financing, and more so than ever delivering health care (Jaffe, 2009). Though the government does not provide healthcare directly, it serves as a financing agent for publicly funded healthcare programs through the taxation of citizens. The total share of the national publicly funded health spending by various governments amounts to 4 percent of the nation's gross domestic product, GDP (Jaffe, 2009). By 2019, government spending on Medicare and Medicaid is expected to rise to 6 percent and 12 percent by 2050 (Jaffe, 2009). The percentages, documented from the Health Policy Brief (2009) by Jaffe, are from Medicare and Medicaid alone. The rapid rates are not due to increase of enrollment but growth in per capita costs for providing healthcare, especially via Medicare.
In order to make ones’ health care coverage more affordable, the nation needs to address the continually increasing medical care costs. Approximately more than one-sixth of the United States economy is devoted to health care spending, such as: soaring prices for medical services, costly prescription drugs, newly advanced medical technology, and even unhealthy lifestyles. Our system is spending approximately $2.7 trillion annually on health care. According to experts, it is estimated that approximately 20%-30% of that spending (approx. $800 billion a year) appears to go towards wasteful, redundant, or even inefficient care.
American people look at their insurance bills, co-pays and drug costs, and can't understand why they continue to increase. The insured should consider all of these reasons before getting upset. In 2004, employee health care premiums increased over 11 percent, four times more than the rate of inflation. In 2003, premiums rose 10.1 percent and in 2002 they rose 15 percent. Employee spending for coverage increased 126 percent between 2000 and 2004. Those increases were lower than expected. (National Coalition on Health Care, 2005, Facts on health care costs). Premiums have risen five times faster than workers wages, on average. If medical spending continues to rise by just two percent more than personal income, by 2040 Medicare and Medicaid would hit 18.5 percent of the gross domestic product, leading the federal deficit to be 20.7 of the gross domestic product. (Melcer, R., 2004, St Louis Post-Dispatch, Rising Costs of healthcare pose huge challenges).
...gery Medical Group. The history of health insurance in the united states. (2007). Retrieved from: http://www.neurosurgical.com/medical_ history_and_ethics/history/history_of_health_insurance.htm
In the article titled, "Health: Medicare and the Economy," by: Dean Foust, found in Business Week and published in 2004, it is stated that, cuts in Medicare would be bad for hospitals and other managed-care providers. Although the United States is considered the strongest country in the world, there are numerous political, social, and economic issues that require reform to improve our way of life. Reform is needed for the health care system in order for Americans to live a life that is both safe and prosperous. Health care and prescription drug costs, whose escalating prices have caused many Americans to go without adequate medical care. Health care is one of the most controversial issues in the news right now. The co...
The two major components of Medicare, the Hospital Insurance Program (Part A of Medicare) and the supplementary Medical Insurance program (Part B) may be exhausted by the year 2025, another sad fact of the Medicare situation at hand (“Medicare’s Future”). The burden brought about by the unfair dealings of HMO’s is having an adverse affect on the Medicare system. With the incredibly large burden brought about by the large amount of patients that Medicare is handed, it is becoming increasingly difficult to fund the system in the way that is necessary for it to function effectively. Most elderly people over the age of 65 are eligible for Medicare, but for a quite disturbing reason they are not able to reap the benefits of the taxes they have paid. Medicare is a national health plan covering 40 mi...
“Medicare and the New Health Care Law — What it Means for You.” (2010). Medicare Publications, http://www.medicare.gov/Publications/Pubs/pdf/11467.pdf
One in six Americans and mostly all of the population 65 years and older, are covered by Medicare. In 2012, Medicare provided for 50.7 million people, 42.1 million aged and 8.5 million disabled, with a total cost of $574 billion. This is about 21% of national health spending and 3.6% of Gross Domestic Product (Davis, 2013). Medicare, being a social insurance program, is required to pay for covered services provided to enrollees so long as the specific criteria is met. On av...
Since the 60s, government budgets have been influenced by the need to finance healthcare especially the cost of Medicare and Medicaid benefits. According to CMS’ National Health Expenditure Projections , total health care expenditures have grown by an average of 2.5 percentage points faster per year than the nation‘s Gross Domestic Product. For about 60 percent of workers who receive some form of health care coverage from their employers, the cost of their health insurance premiums and out-of-pocket expenses have increased significantly faster than their own wages; and between 1999 and 2008, both average health insurance premiums and out-of-pocket costs for deductibles, co-payments for medications, and co-insura...
The US health system has both considerable strengths and notable weaknesses. With a large and well-trained health workforce, access to a wide range of high-quality medical specialists as well as secondary and tertiary institutions, patient outcomes are among the best in the world. But the US also suffers from incomplete coverage of its population, and health expenditure levels per person far exceed all other countries. Poor measures on many objective and subjective indicators of quality and outcomes plague the US health care system. In addition, an unequal distribution of resources across the country and among different population groups results in poor access to care for many citizens. Efforts to provide comprehensive, national health insurance in the United States go back to the Great Depression, and nearly every president since Harry S. Truman has proposed some form of national health insurance.
Theodore Roosevelt, ran as the Progressive Party candidate, he ran on a platform in 1912 that stated: "We pledge ourselves to work unceasingly in State and Nation for . . . the protection of home life against the hazards of sickness, irregular employment and old age through the adoption of a system of social insurance adapted to American use.” Franklin Roosevelt went into further depth and stated that health care was a human right. In Roosevelt’s January 1944 message to Congress, he stated that “freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence,” and demanded for “a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all.” Included in these rights was “the right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health” and “the right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness,...
...care in 2050. While it has been suggested that Medicare funding will run out by 2030, if projected reductions in spending hold true and continue, this system may remain solvent in 2050 (Peralta, 2014).