Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on women and environmental development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on women and environmental development
There is a growing body of literature that has looked at the ways that the gender division of control, ownership and labour and spatial distribution of resources influence the roles and responsibilities and norms ( (Elmhirst, 2011). More recently the gendered debate and FPE has been extended to look at the construction of identities through environmental struggles and practices. There is emphasis on how gender can be re/negotiated in different socio-political and environmental contexts. This text (Sultana, 2006), like others from F. Sultana (Sultana, Suffering for water, suffering from water: Emotional geographies of resource access, control and conflict, 2011) shows how water (nature) itself and water quality can influence resource struggles and the constructions of gender as much as how struggles are gendered. ‘Gendered subjectivities are socially and discursively constructed but also materially constituted; subjectivities are produced through practices and discourses, and involve production of subject-positions (which are usually unstable and shifting)’. Sultana’s argument is that gendered-water relations are not just an interconnection of social axes but also (physical) location, spatial relations and hydrogeological (ecological) conditions related to water. The case study used looks at the once deemed success story of groundwater tube wells in Bangladesh that are now poisoning millions of people because of naturally occurring arsenic contamination. This has resulted in reduced water security as those tube wells that are safe are usually privately owned by people that can afford to drill that deep. To understand gender in water management it is important to understand who does what and why in the spatial context; it is the w...
... middle of paper ...
...orest: Gender, citizenship and creative conjugality. Geoforum, 42, 173-183.
Nightingale, A. (2003). Nature–society and development: social, cultural and ecological change in Nepal. Geoforum, 34, 525-540.
Rocheleau, D., Thomas- Slayter , B., & Wangari, E. (1996). Feminist Political Ecology, Global Issues and Local Experience . London: Routledge.
Sultana, F. (2006). Gendered waters, poisoned wells: Political ecology of the arsenic crisis in Bangladesh. In E. b. Lahiri-Dutt, In Fluid bonds: Views on gender and water (pp. 362-386). NA: Kolkata: Stree Publishers.
Sultana, F. (2009). Fluid lives: subjectivities, gender and water in rural Bangladesh. Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 16(4), 427-444.
Sultana, F. (2011). Suffering for water, suffering from water: Emotional geographies of resource access, control and conflict. Geoforum, 42(2), 163-172.
Maude Barlow’s “Water Incorporated: The Commodification of the World’s Water” gives a voice to a very real, but vastly unknown, issue: the privatization of water. I refer to it as vastly unknown because it wasn’t until this article that I was even aware such a power struggle existed. Barlow first introduces startling statistics, meant to grab the attention of its readers. Once she has your attention, she introduces the “new generation of trade and investment agreements.” (306)
ABSTRACT: Karen Warren presents and defends the ecofeminist position that people are wrong in dominating nature as a whole or in part (individual animals, species, ecosystems, mountains), for the same reason that subordinating women to the will and purposes of men is wrong. She claims that all feminists must object to both types of domination because both are expressions of the same "logic of domination." Yet, problems arise with her claim of twin dominations. The enlightenment tradition gave rise to influential versions of feminism and provided a framework which explains the wrongness of the domination of women by men as a form of injustice. Yet on this account, the domination of nature cannot be assimilated to the domination of women. Worse, on the enlightenment framework, the claim that the domination of nature is wrong in the same way that the domination of women is wrong makes no sense, since (according to this framework) domination can only be considered to be unjust when the object dominated has a will. While ecofeminism rejects the enlightenment view, it cannot simply write off enlightenment feminism as non-feminist. It must show that enlightenment feminism is either inauthentic or conceptually unstable.
“How can you buy or sell the sky-the warmth of the land? The idea is strange to us. Yet we do not own the freshness of air or the sparkle of the water. How can you buy them from us? We will decide in our time” (Chief Seattle: 1855). In the Documentary “Flow – for the love of water” it visualizes the global crisis we face on Mother’s Earth as it pertains to the diminishing of fresh water. The Documentary portrays along with the help of experts that this global crises is affecting each and every one of us in today’s society including animals. The film shows us that water is constantly being wasted, polluted, and privatized by big co operations. Prime examples of these greedy companies were mentioned in the film such as Nestle, Thames, Suez, Vivendi, Coca Cola and Pepsi.
In the piece The Fall of Water by Carole Condé and Karl Beveridge, the clashing worlds between the activists and corporate organizations is perfectly balanced through a replication of the piece Fall of Rebel Angels. Similar to the concept of angels and devils walking the Earth, each side is trying to either preserve or take water away as a natural resource. This piece addresses the politics of water waste and questions our social values. The artists use appropriation to reveal activists in the piece fighting barbarically against Dasani, Coca Cola, Perrier and other large corporations. Shockingly, the police are also seen in the bottom defending the interests and greed of these corrupt organizations. Hiding among the overload of waste, a victim
This paper will answer the question, is it ethical to use fresh water as a political or military good? As water decreases in availability in the future, fresh water will be used as a political and military good more and more. Water is one of the few fundamental elements needed to sustain human life. As conflicts arise in the water strained areas of the world, it will be very enticing for one group to hold their opponents water hostage. Without access to fresh water the opponents would have no chance of winning a war and would have to give in to the first group’s demands.
Water is not a want but a necessary human right people need in order to survive. However, there are about 660 million people in the world that do not have access to safe water. There are also, an estimate of, 2.4 million people who do not have an accessible toilet. In order to get the water needed, many people have to find hours every day collecting water. Due to this education and commerce become harder and less of a priority, a community cannot thrive when there safe water is lacking. By providing safe water and sanitation for those who do not have it they believe they can achieve global equality and make a better and brighter future for
Current definitions of natural resources generally rely on the argument by Zimmerman (1933), where he stated that “resources are not, they become.” Resources are therefore described as appraisals that are mediated culturally for the physical environment (@@@). These appraisals are shaped by belief systems, political institutions, economic factors, and social attributes. Using this perspective, resource geography aims at explaining how the global economy is differentiated and integrated by these mediations. It also aims at examining the environmental outcomes and the wellbeing
In order to better understand the ethical ramifications of commodification a thorough background of the effects of water commodification is necessary. As defined in the introduction water commodification is the transit...
"We are constantly invited by those dutifully serving the gods of profit and production to turn our attention elsewhere, to downgrade our concerns, and to view the very economic system that has caused the present global degradation of the environment as the solution to the problems it has generated" (Foster 25). We do not have to completely reject the current social order. It simply needs to be infused with a more egalitarian social order. Instead of seeing nature and women as inferior and readily exploitable, their connection should be viewed as a ...
Women and children are especially impacted by unsafe drinking water. In many regions of the world, collecting water is primarily the responsibility of women (WHO, 2015). Because women and young girls can spend up to 6 hours each day collecting water, this affects their ability to attend school (WHO, 2015). Additionally, many women do not have the resources to pay for water purchases, treatment, or new investments.
Shrestha, Nanda R. Nepal and Bangladesh: a World studies Handbook. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO, Inc, 2002
Here, subscribing to ecofeminist ideals would encompass acknowledging the dual subjugation framework and supporting initiatives specifically aimed at assisting women who face environmental problems. These initiatives could include sustainable agriculture and development, land conservation, or other types of environmental justice actions. Additionally, the rhetoric used in organization materials like information pamphlets could be analyzed for ecofeminist language or promotion of women’s role in environmental movements or as unique victims of environmental
Warren, Karen J. "Ecological Feminism." Encyclopedia of Environmental Ethics and Philosophy. Ed. J. Baird Callicott and Robert Frodeman. Vol. 1. Detroit: Macmillan Reference USA, 2009. 228-236. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web. 24 Jan. 2012.
Judith Plant believes that women have long been associated with nature and that historically, women have had no real power in the outside world, no place in decision-making. Other things such as the intellectual life, the work of the mind, have traditionally not been accessible to women for many reasons. Some of these reasons have included society’s mentality. According to Judith, today, ecology speaks for the earth, and feminism speaks for the ‘other’ in female/male relations. As for ecofeminism, she believes that by speaking for the original ‘others’, it seeks to understand the interconnected roots of all domination, and ways to resist the change.
Indisputably, roles and characteristics of opposite genders have been ubiquitous, since historical evidence proves so – dating back to when the practice of oral tradition was favored over written language. This historical evidence is especially apparent in literature from previous time periods. In these works of literature, men and women often have very different social and economic positions within society. Particular duties, or tasks, are practiced depending on the gender of these individuals. However, in the advancing world we are currently living in, these duties are beginning to intertwine in an effort to allow equal rights amongst opposite genders. This effort to break the sexist barrier, which encompasses our world, has already begun rattling the chains of politicians and the like. However, with the progressions made thus far in retaliation to sexism and unequal gender privileges, the United States of America is heading in a positive direction towards gender equality. Nonetheless, the female gender is perceived as a lesser entity in society while the male gender is dominant and controlling. The masculine individuals in literary works usually govern, or direct the feminine individuals. These characteristics are often evident in various literary works – including “Hills Like White Elephants,” and “A&P” written by Ernest Hemingway and John Updike, respectively. The slow and steady transformation from a sexist society to one that allows inferior genders to perform similar tasks, if not the same as their superior counterparts, may disturb the ideological mindset of figures with authority; however, it provides inferior genders with the opportunity to branch out socially, economically, and politically.